share_log

Rego Interactive Co., Ltd's (HKG:2422) CEO Huan Tian Is the Most Upbeat Insider, and Their Holdings Increased by 19% Last Week

Rego Interactive Co., Ltd's (HKG:2422) CEO Huan Tian Is the Most Upbeat Insider, and Their Holdings Increased by 19% Last Week

Rego Interactive Co., Ltd.(HKG: 2422)首席執行官田歡是最樂觀的內部人士,上週他們的持股量增加了19%
Simply Wall St ·  2023/01/16 21:10

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Rego Interactive Co., Ltd (HKG:2422), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 75% to be precise, is individual insiders. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

要了解誰真正控制了Rego Interactive Co., Ltd(HKG: 2422),瞭解企業的所有權結構非常重要。持有公司股份最多的集團,確切地說約爲75%,是內部人士。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

As a result, insiders scored the highest last week as the company hit HK$2.5b market cap following a 19% gain in the stock.

結果,內部人士上週創下最高水平,該公司在股價上漲19%後達到了25億港元的市值。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Rego Interactive.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於Rego Interactive的哪些信息。

Check out our latest analysis for Rego Interactive

查看我們對 Rego Interactive 的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
SEHK:2422 Ownership Breakdown January 17th 2023
SEHK: 2422 所有權明細 2023 年 1 月 17 日

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Rego Interactive?

關於Rego Interactive,缺乏機構所有權告訴我們甚麼?

Institutional investors often avoid companies that are too small, too illiquid or too risky for their tastes. But it's unusual to see larger companies without any institutional investors.

機構投資者通常會避開規模太小、流動性太差或風險太大的公司,不符合他們的口味。但是,看到沒有任何機構投資者的大型公司是不尋常的。

There could be various reasons why no institutions own shares in a company. Typically, small, newly listed companies don't attract much attention from fund managers, because it would not be possible for large fund managers to build a meaningful position in the company. It is also possible that fund managers don't own the stock because they aren't convinced it will perform well. Rego Interactive's earnings and revenue track record (below) may not be compelling to institutional investors -- or they simply might not have looked at the business closely.

沒有機構擁有公司股份的原因可能有很多。通常,新上市的小型公司不會引起基金經理的太多關注,因爲大型基金經理不可能在公司中建立有意義的地位。基金經理也有可能不擁有這隻股票,因爲他們不相信股票會表現良好。Rego Interactive的收益和收入記錄(見下文)可能並不吸引機構投資者,或者他們可能根本沒有仔細研究該業務。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SEHK:2422 Earnings and Revenue Growth January 17th 2023
SEHK: 2422 2023 年 1 月 17 日收益和收入增長

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Rego Interactive. With a 45% stake, CEO Huan Tian is the largest shareholder. Ping Chen is the second largest shareholder owning 19% of common stock, and Yongli Zhang holds about 11% of the company stock. Interestingly, the second and third-largest shareholders also happen to be the Top Key Executive and Member of the Board of Directors, respectively. This once again signifies considerable insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.

我們注意到,對沖基金對Rego Interactive的投資沒有實際意義。首席執行官田歡持有45%的股份,是最大的股東。陳平是第二大股東,擁有19%的普通股,張永利持有公司約11%的股份。有趣的是,第二和第三大股東也恰好分別是最高執行官和董事會成員。這再次表明該公司的最大股東擁有大量的內部所有權。

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 64% stake.

對股東登記處的更詳細研究表明,其中兩位最大股東通過其64%的股份擁有公司的大量所有權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以瞭解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。據我們所知,沒有分析師對該公司進行報道,因此它可能處於雷達之下。

Insider Ownership Of Rego Interactive

雷戈互動的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終算在內。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該羣體中。

It seems that insiders own more than half the Rego Interactive Co., Ltd stock. This gives them a lot of power. Given it has a market cap of HK$2.5b, that means they have HK$1.8b worth of shares. Most would argue this is a positive, showing strong alignment with shareholders. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

看來內部人士擁有Rego Interactive Co., Ltd的一半以上的股票。這給了他們很大的力量。鑑於它的市值爲25億港元,這意味着他們擁有價值18億港元的股票。大多數人會認爲這是積極的,表明了與股東的強烈共識。你可以點擊這裏查看那些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 25% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司25%的股份,因此不容忽視。雖然這個團體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運營方式產生真正的影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Rego Interactive better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with Rego Interactive (at least 2 which can't be ignored) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

總值得考慮擁有公司股份的不同羣體。但是要更好地理解 Rego Interactive,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,無處不在的投資風險幽靈爲例。 我們已經確定了 3 個警告信號 使用 Rego Interactive(至少 2 個不容忽視),瞭解它們應該是你投資過程的一部分。

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.

如果你想去另一家公司看看 —— 一家財務狀況可能優異的公司 —— 那千萬不要錯過這個 免費的 有趣的公司名單,以強勁的財務數據爲後盾。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂? 取得聯繫 直接和我們聯繫。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是一般性的。 我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章無意提供財務建議。 它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未將最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料考慮在內。簡而言之,華爾街對上述任何股票都沒有頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論