share_log

Recent Uptick Might Appease UFP Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ:UFPI) Institutional Owners After Losing 0.9% Over the Past Year

Recent Uptick Might Appease UFP Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ:UFPI) Institutional Owners After Losing 0.9% Over the Past Year

最近的上漲可能會安撫 UFP 工業公司(NASDAQ:UFPI)機構所有者在過去一年中失去 0.9% 後
Simply Wall St ·  2023/01/14 08:50

A look at the shareholders of UFP Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ:UFPI) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 84% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看看UFP工業公司(納斯達克:UFP)的股東就能知道哪個集團最有權勢。而持有這塊蛋糕最大份額的是擁有84%股權的機構。換句話説,該集團面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Institutional investors would appreciate the 5.3% increase in share prices last week, given their one-year returns have been disappointing at 0.9%.

機構投資者會欣賞上週5.3%的股價漲幅,因為他們的一年回報率一直令人失望,僅為0.9%。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about UFP Industries.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們什麼關於UFP Industries。

View our latest analysis for UFP Industries

查看我們對UFP行業的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:UFPI Ownership Breakdown January 14th 2023
NasdaqGS:UFPI所有權明細2023年1月14日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About UFP Industries?

關於UFP產業,機構所有制告訴了我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構以一個接近當地市場的指數來衡量它們的表現。因此,他們通常更關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in UFP Industries. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at UFP Industries' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

如你所見,機構投資者在UFP Industries擁有相當數量的股份。這可以表明該公司在投資界具有一定的公信力。然而,最好警惕依賴機構投資者帶來的所謂驗證。他們也一樣,有時也會犯錯。如果多家機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得看看下面UFP Industries的收益歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:UFPI Earnings and Revenue Growth January 13th 2023
NasdaqGS:UFPI收益和收入增長2023年1月13日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in UFP Industries. Our data shows that BlackRock, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 17% of shares outstanding. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 12% of common stock, and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. holds about 4.4% of the company stock. Furthermore, CEO Matthew Missad is the owner of 0.5% of the company's shares.

由於機構投資者擁有一半以上的已發行股票,董事會可能不得不關注他們的偏好。我們注意到,對衝基金沒有對UFP Industries進行有意義的投資。我們的數據顯示,貝萊德股份有限公司是第一大股東,持有17%的流通股。先鋒集團是第二大股東,持有12%的普通股,T.Rowe Price Group,Inc.持有約4.4%的公司股票。此外,首席執行官馬修·米薩德持有該公司0.5%的股份。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 10 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

進一步考察,我們發現,該公司超過一半的股份由前十大股東持有,這表明大股東的利益在一定程度上被小股東平衡了。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究機構持股是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以達到同樣的效果。有很多分析師在追蹤這隻股票,所以他們的預測可能也是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of UFP Industries

UFP產業的內部人所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

儘管對內部人的準確定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認為董事會成員是內部人。公司管理層對董事會負責,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時最高層管理人員本身也是董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認為內部人持股是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這會讓其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in UFP Industries, Inc.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$129m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們最新的數據顯示,內部人士持有UFP Industries,Inc.的一些股份。這是一家相當大的公司,因此看到一些潛在的有意義的結盟通常是積極的。在這種情況下,他們擁有價值約1.29億美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。看到內部人士的投資達到這樣的水平是件好事。你可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否一直在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 14% stake in UFP Industries. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公眾通常是個人投資者,他們持有UFP Industries 14%的股份。雖然這羣人不一定能發號施令,但它肯定能對公司的運營方式產生真正的影響。

Next Steps:

接下來的步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for UFP Industries you should know about.

雖然考慮擁有一家公司的不同集團是很值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如,考慮一下風險。每家公司都有它們,我們已經發現一個UFP行業的警告標誌你應該知道。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你更願意瞭解分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這一預期免費關於分析師預測的報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數字是使用過去12個月的數據計算的,指的是截至財務報表日期的最後一個月的12個月期間。這可能與全年的年度報告數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎? 保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫。或者,也可以給編輯組發電子郵件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰寫,具有概括性。我們僅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並不打算作為財務建議。它不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況。我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內。Simply Wall St.對上述任何一隻股票都沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論