share_log

Recent Uptick Might Appease Nutanix, Inc. (NASDAQ:NTNX) Institutional Owners After Losing 7.7% Over the Past Year

Recent Uptick Might Appease Nutanix, Inc. (NASDAQ:NTNX) Institutional Owners After Losing 7.7% Over the Past Year

最近的上升可能會使 Nutanix 公司(NASDAQ:NTNX)機構所有者在過去一年中損失 7.7% 後可能會安撫機構所有者
Simply Wall St ·  2023/01/13 09:10

If you want to know who really controls Nutanix, Inc. (NASDAQ:NTNX), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 77% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想知道誰真正控制了Nutanix公司(納斯達克代碼:NTNX),那麼你就得看看它的股票登記簿的構成。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司77%的所有權,擁有最大份額。也就是説,如果股價上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果股價下跌,該集團將損失最大)。

After a year of 7.7% losses, last week's 4.9% gain would be welcomed by institutional investors as a likely sign that returns might start trending higher.

在經歷了7.7%的虧損後,上週4.9%的漲幅將受到機構投資者的歡迎,因為這可能是回報率可能開始走高的跡象。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Nutanix.

在下面的圖表中,我們放大了Nutanix的不同所有權組。

Check out our latest analysis for Nutanix

查看我們對Nutanix的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:NTNX Ownership Breakdown January 13th 2023
NasdaqGS:NTNX所有權明細2023年1月13日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Nutanix?

關於Nutanix,機構所有權告訴了我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構以一個接近當地市場的指數來衡量它們的表現。因此,他們通常更關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Nutanix. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Nutanix's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

正如你所看到的,機構投資者在Nutanix擁有相當多的股份。這可以表明該公司在投資界具有一定的公信力。然而,最好警惕依賴機構投資者帶來的所謂驗證。他們也一樣,有時也會犯錯。如果多家機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,下面我們有必要看看Nutanix的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:NTNX Earnings and Revenue Growth January 13th 2023
納斯達克:NTNX收益和收入增長2023年1月13日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Nutanix. The company's largest shareholder is FMR LLC, with ownership of 15%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 11% and 9.2%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

由於機構投資者擁有一半以上的已發行股票,董事會可能不得不關注他們的偏好。對衝基金在Nutanix持有的股份並不多。該公司的最大股東是FMR LLC,持有15%的股份。與此同時,第二大和第三大股東分別持有11%和9.2%的流通股。

We did some more digging and found that 9 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們做了更多的挖掘,發現9個大股東約佔登記的51%,這意味着除了大股東外,還有一些小股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究機構持股是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以達到同樣的效果。相當多的分析師追蹤這隻股票,所以你可以很容易地研究預測增長。

Insider Ownership Of Nutanix

Nutanix的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

不同國家對內部人的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是算數的。公司管理層管理企業,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認為內部人持股是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這會讓其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Nutanix, Inc. in their own names. It is a pretty big company, so it would be possible for board members to own a meaningful interest in the company, without owning much of a proportional interest. In this case, they own around US$40m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們的數據顯示,內部人士以自己的名義持有Nutanix,Inc.不到1%的股份。它是一家相當大的公司,因此董事會成員有可能在該公司擁有有意義的權益,而不是擁有太多按比例分配的權益。在這種情況下,他們擁有價值約4000萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。看到董事會成員持有股票是件好事,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 22% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

包括散户投資者在內的普通公眾持有該公司22%的股份,因此不能輕易忽視。儘管這種規模的所有權可能不足以影響有利於他們的政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

接下來的步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 4 warning signs with Nutanix (at least 1 which makes us a bit uncomfortable) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

我發現看看到底是誰擁有一家公司是非常有趣的。但為了真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,考慮一下無處不在的投資風險幽靈。我們已經確定了4個警告信號對於Nutanix(至少1個,這讓我們有點不舒服),理解它們應該是你投資過程的一部分。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終未來是最重要的。您可以訪問此免費分析師對該公司的預測報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數字是使用過去12個月的數據計算的,指的是截至財務報表日期的最後一個月的12個月期間。這可能與全年的年度報告數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎? 保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫。或者,也可以給編輯組發電子郵件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰寫,具有概括性。我們僅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並不打算作為財務建議。它不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況。我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內。Simply Wall St.對上述任何一隻股票都沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論