share_log

Following a 77% Decline Over Last Year, Recent Gains May Please Skillsoft Corp. (NYSE:SKIL) Institutional Owners

Following a 77% Decline Over Last Year, Recent Gains May Please Skillsoft Corp. (NYSE:SKIL) Institutional Owners

在去年同期下降了 77% 之後,最近的收益可能會取悅 Skillsoft 公司(紐約證交所代碼:SKIL)機構所有者
Simply Wall St ·  2023/01/12 06:20

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Skillsoft Corp. (NYSE:SKIL), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 37% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要想弄清楚誰真正控制了斯基爾軟公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:SKIL),瞭解該公司的所有權結構是很重要的。持有該公司股份最多的集團,準確地説約為37%,是機構。換句話説,該集團將從他們對公司的投資中獲得最大(或損失最大)。

Last week's US$58m market cap gain would probably be appreciated by institutional investors, especially after a year of 77% losses.

上週5800萬美元的市值增長可能會受到機構投資者的讚賞,特別是在經歷了77%的虧損之後。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Skillsoft.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們什麼關於斯基爾軟。

See our latest analysis for Skillsoft

查看我們對Skill soft的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:SKIL Ownership Breakdown January 12th 2023
紐約證券交易所:Skil所有權明細2023年1月12日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Skillsoft?

機構所有權告訴了我們關於斯基爾軟的什麼信息?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與經常跟蹤的指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常確實會考慮收購被納入相關基準指數的較大公司。

We can see that Skillsoft does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Skillsoft, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到,斯基爾軟確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司很大一部分股票。這可以表明該公司在投資界具有一定的公信力。然而,最好警惕依賴機構投資者帶來的所謂驗證。他們也一樣,有時也會犯錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售一隻股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,我們有必要看看斯基爾軟過去的盈利軌跡(見下圖)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:SKIL Earnings and Revenue Growth January 12th 2023
紐約證券交易所:Skil收益和收入增長2023年1月12日

Skillsoft is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that Naspers Limited is the largest shareholder with 37% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 5.4% and 4.7% of the stock.

斯基爾軟並非由對衝基金所有。我們的數據顯示,Naspers Limited是最大股東,持有37%的流通股。相比之下,第二大和第三大股東分別持有約5.4%和4.7%的股份。

Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 51% of the company is controlled by the top 4 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business.

我們的研究還揭示了這樣一個事實,即公司約51%的股份由前4名股東控制,這表明這些所有者對業務具有重大影響。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究一家公司的機構持股可以增加你的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地瞭解一隻股票的預期表現也是一個很好的做法。相當多的分析師追蹤這隻股票,所以你可以很容易地研究預測增長。

Insider Ownership Of Skillsoft

斯基爾軟的內部人所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

儘管對內部人的準確定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認為董事會成員是內部人。管理層最終要向董事會負責。然而,經理人擔任執行董事會成員並不少見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官的話。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

內部人持股是積極的,當它標誌着領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時。然而,高內部人持股也可以給公司內部的一個小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Skillsoft Corp.. In their own names, insiders own US$22m worth of stock in the US$288m company. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

股東們可能會有興趣瞭解到,內部人士持有斯基爾軟公司的股票。內部人士以自己的名義持有這家市值2.88億美元的公司價值2200萬美元的股票。看到內部人士進行一些投資是好事,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 15% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散户投資者在內的普通公眾持有該公司15%的股份,因此不能輕易忽視。這種規模的所有權雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

Public companies currently own 37% of Skillsoft stock. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.

上市公司目前持有Skill soft 37%的股份。這可能是一種戰略利益,兩家公司可能有相關的商業利益。這可能是因為它們已經解體。這一持股可能值得進一步調查。

Next Steps:

接下來的步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that Skillsoft is showing 3 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about...

雖然考慮擁有一家公司的不同集團是很值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。請注意,Skill Soft正在展示我們的投資分析中的3個警告信號,你應該知道關於……

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終這就是未來,而不是過去,這將決定這家企業的所有者將做得多好。因此,我們認為,看看這份免費報告是明智的,它顯示了分析師是否預測到了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數字是使用過去12個月的數據計算的,指的是截至財務報表日期的最後一個月的12個月期間。這可能與全年的年度報告數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎? 保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫。或者,也可以給編輯組發電子郵件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰寫,具有概括性。我們僅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並不打算作為財務建議。它不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況。我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內。Simply Wall St.對上述任何一隻股票都沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論