-
市場
-
產品
-
資訊
-
Moo社區
-
課堂
-
查看更多
-
功能介紹
-
費用費用透明,無最低余額限制
投資選擇、功能介紹、費用相關信息由Moomoo Financial Inc.提供
- English
- 中文繁體
- 中文简体
- 深色
- 淺色
Exscientia Plc's (NASDAQ:EXAI) Market Cap Touched US$613m Last Week, Benefiting Both Individual Investors Who Own 57% as Well as Institutions
Exscientia Plc's (NASDAQ:EXAI) Market Cap Touched US$613m Last Week, Benefiting Both Individual Investors Who Own 57% as Well as Institutions
A look at the shareholders of Exscientia plc (NASDAQ:EXAI) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that individual investors own the lion's share in the company with 57% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
While individual investors were the group that reaped the most benefits after last week's 14% price gain, institutions also received a 28% cut.
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Exscientia, beginning with the chart below.
See our latest analysis for Exscientia
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Exscientia?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
Exscientia already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Exscientia, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Exscientia. With a 15% stake, CEO Andrew Hopkins is the largest shareholder. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 5.2% and 4.6%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
Insider Ownership Of Exscientia
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Exscientia plc. Insiders own US$95m worth of shares in the US$613m company. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.
General Public Ownership
The general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, collectively holds 57% of Exscientia shares. This level of ownership gives investors from the wider public some power to sway key policy decisions such as board composition, executive compensation, and the dividend payout ratio.
Next Steps:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Exscientia better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 4 warning signs for Exscientia you should be aware of, and 1 of them is a bit unpleasant.
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
A look at the shareholders of Exscientia plc (NASDAQ:EXAI) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that individual investors own the lion's share in the company with 57% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
看一眼埃克森美孚(納斯達克:EXAI)的股東,就能知道哪個集團最有權勢。我們可以看到,個人投資者以57%的股權擁有公司的最大份額。換句話説,該集團將從他們對公司的投資中獲得最大(或損失最大)。
While individual investors were the group that reaped the most benefits after last week's 14% price gain, institutions also received a 28% cut.
雖然個人投資者是在上週股價上漲14%後獲益最多的羣體,但機構投資者的股價也下跌了28%。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Exscientia, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們從下面的圖表開始,更深入地研究ExScience a的每種類型的所有者。
See our latest analysis for Exscientia
查看我們對ExScience a的最新分析
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Exscientia?
機構所有制告訴了我們關於ExScience a的什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與經常跟蹤的指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常確實會考慮收購被納入相關基準指數的較大公司。
Exscientia already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Exscientia, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
ExScience a已經在股票登記處登記了機構。事實上,他們在該公司擁有可觀的股份。這可以表明該公司在投資界具有一定的公信力。然而,最好警惕依賴機構投資者帶來的所謂驗證。他們也一樣,有時也會犯錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售一隻股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,我們有必要看看ExScience a過去的盈利軌跡(見下圖)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Exscientia. With a 15% stake, CEO Andrew Hopkins is the largest shareholder. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 5.2% and 4.6%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
對衝基金在ExScience a的股份並不多。首席執行官安德魯·霍普金斯持有15%的股份,是最大的股東。與此同時,第二大和第三大股東分別持有5.2%和4.6%的流通股。
A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.
更深入地研究我們的所有權數據就會發現,前25名股東總共持有的股份不到登記冊的一半,這表明有一大羣小股東,沒有單一股東佔多數。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
研究機構持股是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以達到同樣的效果。相當多的分析師追蹤這隻股票,所以你可以很容易地研究預測增長。
Insider Ownership Of Exscientia
ExScience a的內部人所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司內部人的定義可能是主觀的,而且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個別內部人士,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理層管理企業,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認為內部人持股是積極的,因為它可以表明董事會與其他股東很好地結盟。然而,在某些情況下,太多的權力集中在這個羣體中。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Exscientia plc. Insiders own US$95m worth of shares in the US$613m company. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.
內部人士似乎持有ExScience a plc很大比例的股份。內部人士持有這家市值6.13億美元的公司價值9500萬美元的股票。這可能表明,創始人仍持有大量股份。您可以單擊此處查看他們是在買入還是在賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, collectively holds 57% of Exscientia shares. This level of ownership gives investors from the wider public some power to sway key policy decisions such as board composition, executive compensation, and the dividend payout ratio.
公眾,主要由個人投資者組成,總共持有ExScience a公司57%的股份。這種所有權水平使更廣泛的公眾投資者有一定的權力影響關鍵政策決策,如董事會組成、高管薪酬和股息支付率。
Next Steps:
接下來的步驟:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Exscientia better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 4 warning signs for Exscientia you should be aware of, and 1 of them is a bit unpleasant.
擁有一家公司股票的不同集團總是值得考慮的。但為了更好地理解ExScience,我們還需要考慮許多其他因素。一個恰當的例子:我們發現了埃克斯卡納的4個警示信號你應該知道,其中一個是有點令人不快的。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果你更願意瞭解分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這一預期免費關於分析師預測的報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數字是使用過去12個月的數據計算的,指的是截至財務報表日期的最後一個月的12個月期間。這可能與全年的年度報告數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎? 保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫。或者,也可以給編輯組發電子郵件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰寫,具有概括性。我們僅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並不打算作為財務建議。它不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況。我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內。Simply Wall St.對上述任何一隻股票都沒有持倉。
moomoo是Moomoo Technologies Inc.公司提供的金融資訊和交易應用程式。
在美國,moomoo上的投資產品和服務由Moomoo Financial Inc.提供,一家受美國證券交易委員會(SEC)監管的持牌主體。 Moomoo Financial Inc.是金融業監管局(FINRA)和證券投資者保護公司(SIPC)的成員。
在新加坡,moomoo上的投資產品和服務是通過Moomoo Financial Singapore Pte. Ltd.提供,該公司受新加坡金融管理局(MAS)監管(牌照號碼︰CMS101000) ,持有資本市場服務牌照 (CMS) ,持有財務顧問豁免(Exempt Financial Adviser)資質。本內容未經新加坡金融管理局的審查。
在澳大利亞,moomoo上的金融產品和服務是通過Futu Securities (Australia) Ltd提供,該公司是受澳大利亞證券和投資委員會(ASIC)監管的澳大利亞金融服務許可機構(AFSL No. 224663)。請閱讀並理解我們的《金融服務指南》、《條款與條件》、《隱私政策》和其他披露文件,這些文件可在我們的網站 https://www.moomoo.com/au中獲取。
在加拿大,透過moomoo應用程式提供的僅限訂單執行的券商服務由Moomoo Financial Canada Inc.提供,並受加拿大投資監管機構(CIRO)監管。
在馬來西亞,moomoo上的投資產品和服務是透過Moomoo Securities Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. 提供,該公司受馬來西亞證券監督委員會(SC)監管(牌照號碼︰eCMSL/A0397/2024) ,持有資本市場服務牌照 (CMSL) 。本內容未經馬來西亞證券監督委員會的審查。
Moomoo Technologies Inc., Moomoo Financial Inc., Moomoo Financial Singapore Pte. Ltd.,Futu Securities (Australia) Ltd, Moomoo Financial Canada Inc和Moomoo Securities Malaysia Sdn. Bhd., 是關聯公司。
風險及免責聲明
moomoo是Moomoo Technologies Inc.公司提供的金融資訊和交易應用程式。
在美國,moomoo上的投資產品和服務由Moomoo Financial Inc.提供,一家受美國證券交易委員會(SEC)監管的持牌主體。 Moomoo Financial Inc.是金融業監管局(FINRA)和證券投資者保護公司(SIPC)的成員。
在新加坡,moomoo上的投資產品和服務是通過Moomoo Financial Singapore Pte. Ltd.提供,該公司受新加坡金融管理局(MAS)監管(牌照號碼︰CMS101000) ,持有資本市場服務牌照 (CMS) ,持有財務顧問豁免(Exempt Financial Adviser)資質。本內容未經新加坡金融管理局的審查。
在澳大利亞,moomoo上的金融產品和服務是通過Futu Securities (Australia) Ltd提供,該公司是受澳大利亞證券和投資委員會(ASIC)監管的澳大利亞金融服務許可機構(AFSL No. 224663)。請閱讀並理解我們的《金融服務指南》、《條款與條件》、《隱私政策》和其他披露文件,這些文件可在我們的網站 https://www.moomoo.com/au中獲取。
在加拿大,透過moomoo應用程式提供的僅限訂單執行的券商服務由Moomoo Financial Canada Inc.提供,並受加拿大投資監管機構(CIRO)監管。
在馬來西亞,moomoo上的投資產品和服務是透過Moomoo Securities Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. 提供,該公司受馬來西亞證券監督委員會(SC)監管(牌照號碼︰eCMSL/A0397/2024) ,持有資本市場服務牌照 (CMSL) 。本內容未經馬來西亞證券監督委員會的審查。
Moomoo Technologies Inc., Moomoo Financial Inc., Moomoo Financial Singapore Pte. Ltd.,Futu Securities (Australia) Ltd, Moomoo Financial Canada Inc和Moomoo Securities Malaysia Sdn. Bhd., 是關聯公司。
- 分享到weixin
- 分享到qq
- 分享到facebook
- 分享到twitter
- 分享到微博
- 粘贴板
使用瀏覽器的分享功能,分享給你的好友吧