share_log

Painful Week for Individual Investors Invested in Sharecare, Inc. (NASDAQ:SHCR) After 9.8% Drop, Institutions Also Suffered Losses

Painful Week for Individual Investors Invested in Sharecare, Inc. (NASDAQ:SHCR) After 9.8% Drop, Institutions Also Suffered Losses

投資於沙雷卡公司(NASDAQ:SHCR)的個人投資者痛苦的一周在 9.8% 下跌後,機構也遭受了損失
Simply Wall St ·  2022/12/29 05:45

A look at the shareholders of Sharecare, Inc. (NASDAQ:SHCR) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that individual investors own the lion's share in the company with 46% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看看Sharecare,Inc.(納斯達克:SHCR)的股東就能知道哪個集團最有權勢。我們可以看到,個人投資者擁有46%的股份,擁有公司的最大份額。換句話説,該集團面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

While institutions, who own 35% shares weren't spared from last week's US$60m market cap drop, individual investors as a group suffered the maximum losses

儘管持有35%股份的機構未能倖免於上週6000萬美元的市值下跌,但個人投資者作為一個整體遭受了最大的損失

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Sharecare.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於Sharecare的什麼。

See our latest analysis for Sharecare

查看我們對Sharecare的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:SHCR Ownership Breakdown December 29th 2022
NasdaqGS:SHCR所有權明細2022年12月29日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Sharecare?

關於Sharecare,機構所有制告訴了我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時,以基準來衡量自己,因此一旦一隻股票被納入主要指數,它們往往會對這隻股票變得更加熱情。我們預計,大多數公司都會有一些機構登記在冊,特別是在它們正在增長的情況下。

Sharecare already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Sharecare, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

Sharecare已經在股票登記處有機構。事實上,他們在該公司擁有可觀的股份。這意味着為這些機構工作的分析師已經看過了這隻股票,他們喜歡它。但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能錯了。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售一隻股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,看看Sharecare過去的盈利軌跡是值得的(見下圖)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:SHCR Earnings and Revenue Growth December 29th 2022
NasdaqGS:SHCR收益和收入增長2022年12月29日

Sharecare is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that Claritas Capital is the largest shareholder with 10% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 5.5% and 4.8% of the stock. In addition, we found that Jeffrey Arnold, the CEO has 2.4% of the shares allocated to their name.

Sharecare並不為對衝基金所有。我們的數據顯示,Claritas Capital是最大的股東,持有10%的流通股。相比之下,第二大和第三大股東分別持有約5.5%和4.8%的股份。此外,我們發現,首席執行官傑弗裏·阿諾德有2.4%的股份分配給了他們的名字。

On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.

在研究我們的所有權數據時,我們發現,25名大股東總共擁有不到50%的股份登記,這意味着沒有一個人擁有多數股權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

雖然研究一家公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以瞭解風向也是有意義的。有很多分析師在追蹤這隻股票,所以他們的預測可能也是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of Sharecare

Sharecare的內部人所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同國家對內部人的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是算數的。公司管理層對董事會負責,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時最高層管理人員本身也是董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認為內部人持股是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這會讓其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。

We can see that insiders own shares in Sharecare, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$555m, and insiders have US$21m worth of shares, in their own names. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們可以看到,內部人士持有Sharecare,Inc.的股份。它的市值僅為5.55億美元,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值2100萬美元的股票。看到內部人士進行一些投資是好事,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 46% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散户投資者在內的普通公眾持有該公司46%的股份,因此不能輕易忽視。這種規模的所有權雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

Private equity firms hold a 10% stake in Sharecare. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

私募股權公司持有Sharecare 10%的股份。這表明,他們可以在關鍵的政策決策中發揮影響力。一些人可能會喜歡這樣,因為私人股本有時是讓管理層承擔責任的積極分子。但在其他時候,私募股權公司讓公司上市後,它們的股票都賣光了。

Private Company Ownership

私營公司所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 4.8%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我們可以看到,私營公司擁有4.8%的已發行股份。或許有必要對此進行更深入的研究。如果關聯方,如內部人士,對這些私營公司中的一家有利害關係,則應在年報中披露。私營公司也可能對該公司擁有戰略利益。

Next Steps:

接下來的步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with Sharecare , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

雖然考慮擁有一家公司的不同集團是很值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如,考慮一下無處不在的投資風險幽靈。我們已經確定了兩個警告信號與Sharecare合作,瞭解他們應該是你投資過程的一部分。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終這就是未來,而不是過去,這將決定這家企業的所有者將做得多好。因此,我們認為,看看這份免費報告是明智的,它顯示了分析師是否預測到了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數字是使用過去12個月的數據計算的,指的是截至財務報表日期的最後一個月的12個月期間。這可能與全年的年度報告數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎? 保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫。或者,也可以給編輯組發電子郵件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰寫,具有概括性。我們僅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並不打算作為財務建議。它不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況。我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內。Simply Wall St.對上述任何一隻股票都沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論