share_log

How Many SATS Ltd. (SGX:S58) Shares Do Institutions Own?

How Many SATS Ltd. (SGX:S58) Shares Do Institutions Own?

機構持有多少股SATS Ltd.(SGX:S58)股票?
Simply Wall St ·  2022/06/29 20:30

Every investor in SATS Ltd. (SGX:S58) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. Large companies usually have institutions as shareholders, and we usually see insiders owning shares in smaller companies. Companies that used to be publicly owned tend to have lower insider ownership.

SATS有限公司(SGX:S58)的每一位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東羣體。大公司通常有機構作為股東,我們通常會看到內部人士持有小公司的股份。過去屬於公眾所有的公司往往擁有較低的內部人持股比例。

SATS has a market capitalization of S$4.4b, so it's too big to fly under the radar. We'd expect to see both institutions and retail investors owning a portion of the company. Taking a look at our data on the ownership groups (below), it seems that institutional investors have bought into the company. Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about SATS.

Sts的市值為44億新元,因此它太大了,不能低調運行。我們預計,機構投資者和散户投資者都將擁有該公司的部分股權。看看我們關於所有權集團的數據(如下所示),似乎是機構投資者買入了該公司的股票。讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們什麼關於SATS的信息。

See our latest analysis for SATS

查看我們對SATS的最新分析

SGX:S58 Ownership Breakdown June 30th 2022
新交所:S58所有權明細2022年6月30日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About SATS?

關於SATS,機構所有權告訴了我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時,以基準來衡量自己,因此一旦一隻股票被納入主要指數,它們往往會對這隻股票變得更加熱情。我們預計,大多數公司都會有一些機構登記在冊,特別是在它們正在增長的情況下。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in SATS. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see SATS' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如你所看到的,機構投資者在SATS中擁有相當多的股份。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因為機構有時會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人一樣。當多家機構持有一隻股票時,它們總是面臨“擁擠交易”的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速拋售股票。在一家沒有增長曆史的公司,這一風險更高。你可以在下面看到SATS的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事中總是有更多的東西。

SGX:S58 Earnings and Revenue Growth June 30th 2022
新交所:S58收益和收入增長2022年6月30日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in SATS. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Temasek Holdings (Private) Limited with 40% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 3.7% and 1.9% of the stock.

對衝基金在SATS中持有的股份並不多。從我們的數據可以看到,最大的股東是淡馬錫控股(私人)有限公司,持有40%的流通股。相比之下,第二大和第三大股東分別持有約3.7%和1.9%的股份。

We did some more digging and found that 8 of the top shareholders account for roughly 50% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們做了更多的挖掘,發現大股東中有8個約佔登記的50%,這意味着除了大股東外,還有一些小股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構持股是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以達到同樣的效果。有相當數量的分析師追蹤該股,因此瞭解他們對未來的總體看法可能是有用的。

Insider Ownership Of SATS

SATS的內部人所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

儘管對內部人的準確定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認為董事會成員是內部人。公司管理層對董事會負責,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時最高層管理人員本身也是董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認為內部人持股是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這會讓其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of SATS Ltd. in their own names. It's a big company, so even a small proportional interest can create alignment between the board and shareholders. In this case insiders own S$41m worth of shares. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們的數據顯示,內部人士以自己的名義持有SATS有限公司不到1%的股份。它是一家大公司,所以即使是很小的比例權益也可以在董事會和股東之間建立聯盟。在這種情況下,內部人士持有價值4100萬新元的股票。看到董事會成員持有股票是件好事,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 43% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散户投資者在內的普通公眾持有該公司43%的股份,因此不能輕易忽視。這種規模的所有權雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

With an ownership of 40%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

擁有40%股權的私募股權公司有能力在塑造專注於價值創造的公司戰略方面發揮作用。有時我們會看到私募股權投資長期存在,但總的來説,它們的投資期限較短,而且--顧名思義--不會對上市公司進行太多投資。一段時間後,他們可能會考慮出售並將資本重新配置到其他地方。

Next Steps:

接下來的步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for SATS that you should be aware of before investing here.

雖然考慮擁有一家公司的不同集團是很值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如,我們發現1個SATS警告標誌在這裏投資之前你應該意識到這一點。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終未來是最重要的。您可以訪問此免費分析師對該公司的預測報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數字是使用過去12個月的數據計算的,指的是截至財務報表日期的最後一個月的12個月期間。這可能與全年的年度報告數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎? 保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫。或者,也可以給編輯組發電子郵件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰寫,具有概括性。我們僅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並不打算作為財務建議。它不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況。我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內。Simply Wall St.對上述任何一隻股票都沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論