share_log

What Type Of Shareholders Own The Most Number of China All Nation International Holdings Group Limited (HKG:8170) Shares?

What Type Of Shareholders Own The Most Number of China All Nation International Holdings Group Limited (HKG:8170) Shares?

哪種類型的股東持有中國全國國際控股集團有限公司(HKG:8170)的股份最多?
Simply Wall St ·  2022/06/29 19:45

A look at the shareholders of China All Nation International Holdings Group Limited (HKG:8170) can tell us which group is most powerful. Insiders often own a large chunk of younger, smaller, companies while huge companies tend to have institutions as shareholders. I quite like to see at least a little bit of insider ownership. As Charlie Munger said 'Show me the incentive and I will show you the outcome.

看看中國萬國國際控股集團有限公司(HKG:8170)的股東,我們就知道哪個集團最有權勢。內部人士通常持有大量較年輕、規模較小的公司,而大公司往往有機構作為股東。我非常希望看到至少有一點內部人持股。正如查理·芒格所説,給我看激勵措施,我就會告訴你結果。

With a market capitalization of HK$1.3b, China All Nation International Holdings Group is a small cap stock, so it might not be well known by many institutional investors. In the chart below, we can see that institutions are not on the share registry. Let's delve deeper into each type of owner, to discover more about China All Nation International Holdings Group.

中國萬國國際控股集團市值13億港元,是一隻小盤股,因此可能不為許多機構投資者所熟知。在下面的圖表中,我們可以看到,機構不在股票登記處。讓我們更深入地研究每種類型的所有者,以更多地瞭解中國全民國際控股集團。

Check out our latest analysis for China All Nation International Holdings Group

查看我們對中國萬國國際控股集團的最新分析

SEHK:8170 Ownership Breakdown June 29th 2022
聯交所:8170所有權明細2022年6月29日

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About China All Nation International Holdings Group?

機構所有權的缺失告訴了我們關於中國萬國國際控股集團的什麼信息?

Small companies that are not very actively traded often lack institutional investors, but it's less common to see large companies without them.

交易不太活躍的小公司往往缺乏機構投資者,但大公司沒有機構投資者的情況較少。

There are multiple explanations for why institutions don't own a stock. The most common is that the company is too small relative to funds under management, so the institution does not bother to look closely at the company. On the other hand, it's always possible that professional investors are avoiding a company because they don't think it's the best place for their money. Institutional investors may not find the historic growth of the business impressive, or there might be other factors at play. You can see the past revenue performance of China All Nation International Holdings Group, for yourself, below.

對於機構為何不持有股票,有多種解釋。最常見的是,相對於管理下的資金,該公司規模太小,因此該機構不會費心密切關注該公司。另一方面,專業投資者總是可能會避開一家公司,因為他們認為這不是他們投資的最佳地方。機構投資者可能不會覺得這項業務的歷史性增長令人印象深刻,或者可能有其他因素在起作用。你可以在下面看到中國全邦國際控股集團過去的收入表現。

SEHK:8170 Earnings and Revenue Growth June 29th 2022
聯交所:8170盈利及收入增長2022年6月29日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in China All Nation International Holdings Group. Because actions speak louder than words, we consider it a good sign when insiders own a significant stake in a company. In China All Nation International Holdings Group's case, its Top Key Executive, Ye Lin, is the largest shareholder, holding 28% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 15% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 13% by the third-largest shareholder.

對衝基金在中國萬國國際控股集團的股份並不多。由於行動勝於雄辯,我們認為,當內部人士持有一家公司的大量股份時,這是一個好跡象。在中國萬國國際控股集團的案例中,其最高管理層葉林是最大股東,持有28%的流通股。作為參考,第二大股東持有約15%的流通股,第三大股東持有13%的股份。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 3 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.

經過進一步挖掘,我們發現,前3名股東合計控制了公司一半以上的股份,這意味着他們擁有相當大的權力來影響公司的決策。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.

雖然研究一家公司的機構持股可以增加你的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地瞭解一隻股票的預期表現也是一個很好的做法。我們的信息顯示,分析師沒有對該股進行任何報道,因此它可能鮮為人知。

Insider Ownership Of China All Nation International Holdings Group

中國全國國際控股集團的內部人所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人的定義可能是主觀的,而且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個別內部人士,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理層對董事會負責,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時最高層管理人員本身也是董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認為內部人持股是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這會讓其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。

It seems that insiders own more than half the China All Nation International Holdings Group Limited stock. This gives them a lot of power. So they have a HK$1.1b stake in this HK$1.3b business. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish todiscover (for free) if they have been buying or selling.

看來,內部人士持有中國全邦國際控股集團有限公司一半以上的股份。這給了他們很大的權力。因此,他們在這項13億港元的業務中持有11億港元的股份。大多數人會高興地看到董事會與他們一起投資。您可能希望發現(免費)如果他們一直在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 20% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over China All Nation International Holdings Group. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

持有20%股權的普通公眾,主要由個人投資者組成,對中國萬國國際控股集團有一定程度的影響力。雖然這羣人不一定能發號施令,但它肯定能對公司的運營方式產生真正的影響。

Next Steps:

接下來的步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand China All Nation International Holdings Group better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should learn about the 2 warning signs we've spotted with China All Nation International Holdings Group (including 1 which doesn't sit too well with us) .

擁有一家公司股票的不同集團總是值得考慮的。但要更好地瞭解中國全邦國際控股集團,我們還需要考慮許多其他因素。為此,您應該瞭解2個警告標誌我們已經發現了中國萬國國際控股集團(包括1家不太受我們歡迎的公司)。

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.

如果你更願意看看另一家公司--一家財務狀況可能更好的公司--那麼不要錯過這一點免費令人感興趣的公司名單,有強勁的財務數據支持。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數字是使用過去12個月的數據計算的,指的是截至財務報表日期的最後一個月的12個月期間。這可能與全年的年度報告數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎? 保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫。或者,也可以給編輯組發電子郵件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰寫,具有概括性。我們僅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並不打算作為財務建議。它不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況。我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內。Simply Wall St.對上述任何一隻股票都沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論