share_log

Do Institutions Own Xin Point Holdings Limited (HKG:1571) Shares?

Do Institutions Own Xin Point Holdings Limited (HKG:1571) Shares?

機構是否擁有新點控股有限公司(HKG:1571)的股份?
Simply Wall St ·  2022/06/24 20:45

The big shareholder groups in Xin Point Holdings Limited (HKG:1571) have power over the company. Institutions often own shares in more established companies, while it's not unusual to see insiders own a fair bit of smaller companies. Warren Buffett said that he likes "a business with enduring competitive advantages that is run by able and owner-oriented people." So it's nice to see some insider ownership, because it may suggest that management is owner-oriented.

信點控股有限公司(HKG:1571)的大股東集團擁有對公司的控制權。機構通常持有較成熟公司的股票,而內部人士擁有相當一部分較小公司的情況並不少見。沃倫·巴菲特説,他喜歡“一家由有能力、以所有者為導向的人經營的、具有持久競爭優勢的企業”。因此,看到一些內部人持股是件好事,因為這可能表明管理層是以所有者為導向的。

Xin Point Holdings is not a large company by global standards. It has a market capitalization of HK$2.4b, which means it wouldn't have the attention of many institutional investors. Our analysis of the ownership of the company, below, shows that institutional investors have not yet purchased much of the company. We can zoom in on the different ownership groups, to learn more about Xin Point Holdings.

以全球標準來看,新點控股並不是一家大公司。它的市值為24億港元,這意味着它不會受到許多機構投資者的關注。我們對該公司所有權的分析顯示,機構投資者尚未購買該公司的大量股份。我們可以放大不同的所有權組,瞭解更多關於信點控股的信息。

Check out our latest analysis for Xin Point Holdings

查看我們對新點控股的最新分析

SEHK:1571 Ownership Breakdown June 24th 2022
聯交所:1571所有權分類2022年6月24日

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Xin Point Holdings?

機構所有權的缺失告訴了我們關於新點控股的什麼信息?

Institutional investors often avoid companies that are too small, too illiquid or too risky for their tastes. But it's unusual to see larger companies without any institutional investors.

機構投資者往往會避開那些規模太小、流動性太差或風險太高的公司,這些公司對他們的口味來説太小了。但在沒有任何機構投資者的情況下,看到較大的公司並不常見。

There are many reasons why a company might not have any institutions on the share registry. It may be hard for institutions to buy large amounts of shares, if liquidity (the amount of shares traded each day) is low. If the company has not needed to raise capital, institutions might lack the opportunity to build a position. It is also possible that fund managers don't own the stock because they aren't convinced it will perform well. Institutional investors may not find the historic growth of the business impressive, or there might be other factors at play. You can see the past revenue performance of Xin Point Holdings, for yourself, below.

一家公司可能沒有在股票登記處登記任何機構的原因有很多。如果流動性(每天交易的股票數量)很低,機構可能很難購買大量股票。如果該公司不需要籌集資金,機構可能缺乏建立頭寸的機會。基金經理也有可能不持有這隻股票,因為他們不相信它會表現良好。機構投資者可能不會覺得這項業務的歷史性增長令人印象深刻,或者可能有其他因素在起作用。你可以在下面看到信點控股過去的收入表現。

SEHK:1571 Earnings and Revenue Growth June 24th 2022
聯交所:2022年6月24日盈利及收入增長1571

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Xin Point Holdings. The company's CEO Xiaoming Ma is the largest shareholder with 74% of shares outstanding. With such a huge stake, we infer that they have significant control of the future of the company. It's usually considered a good sign when insiders own a significant number of shares in the company, and in this case, we're glad to see a company insider with such skin in the game. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 6.3% and 0.6% of the stock.

對衝基金持有的新點控股股份並不多。該公司首席執行官馬曉明是最大股東,持有74%的流通股。擁有如此龐大的股份,我們推斷他們對公司的未來有很大的控制權。當內部人持有公司大量股份時,這通常被認為是一個好兆頭,在這種情況下,我們很高興看到公司內部人士有這樣的皮膚。相比之下,第二大股東和第三大股東分別持有約6.3%和0.6%的股份。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.

雖然研究一家公司的機構持股可以增加你的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地瞭解一隻股票的預期表現也是一個很好的做法。分析師對該股的報道不多,但也不多。因此,它有獲得更多報道的空間。

Insider Ownership Of Xin Point Holdings

信點控股的內部人所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人的定義可能是主觀的,而且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個別內部人士,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理層對董事會負責,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時最高層管理人員本身也是董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認為內部人持股是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這會讓其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。

It seems that insiders own more than half the Xin Point Holdings Limited stock. This gives them a lot of power. That means they own HK$1.8b worth of shares in the HK$2.4b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish todiscover (for free) if they have been buying or selling.

看來,內部人士持有新點控股有限公司一半以上的股票。這給了他們很大的權力。這意味着他們持有這家市值24億港元的公司價值18億港元的股票。這是很有意義的。大多數人會高興地看到董事會與他們一起投資。您可能希望發現(免費)如果他們一直在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 19% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散户投資者在內的普通公眾持有該公司19%的股份,因此不能輕易忽視。這種規模的所有權雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

With a stake of 6.3%, private equity firms could influence the Xin Point Holdings board. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

私募股權公司持有6.3%的股份,可能會影響Xin Point Holdings董事會。一些人可能會喜歡這樣,因為私人股本有時是讓管理層承擔責任的積極分子。但在其他時候,私募股權公司讓公司上市後,它們的股票都賣光了。

Next Steps:

接下來的步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 4 warning signs for Xin Point Holdings (1 is a bit unpleasant!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

雖然考慮擁有一家公司的不同集團是很值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如,我們發現新點控股的4個警告標誌(1有點令人不快!)在這裏投資之前你應該意識到這一點。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終未來是最重要的。您可以訪問此免費分析師對該公司的預測報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數字是使用過去12個月的數據計算的,指的是截至財務報表日期的最後一個月的12個月期間。這可能與全年的年度報告數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎? 保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫。或者,也可以給編輯組發電子郵件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰寫,具有概括性。我們僅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並不打算作為財務建議。它不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況。我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內。Simply Wall St.對上述任何一隻股票都沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論