share_log

What Is The Ownership Structure Like For Jinneng Science&Techology Co.,Ltd (SHSE:603113)?

What Is The Ownership Structure Like For Jinneng Science&Techology Co.,Ltd (SHSE:603113)?

金能科技股份有限公司(上海證券交易所股票代碼:603113)的股權結構如何?
Simply Wall St ·  2022/06/21 19:13

If you want to know who really controls Jinneng Science&Techology Co.,Ltd (SHSE:603113), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. Insiders often own a large chunk of younger, smaller, companies while huge companies tend to have institutions as shareholders. I generally like to see some degree of insider ownership, even if only a little. As Nassim Nicholas Taleb said, 'Don't tell me what you think, tell me what you have in your portfolio.

如果你想知道誰真正控制了金能科技股份有限公司(上交所代碼:603113),那麼你就得看看它的股票登記簿的構成。內部人士通常持有大量較年輕、規模較小的公司,而大公司往往有機構作為股東。我通常喜歡看到一定程度的內部人持股,即使只是一小部分。正如納西姆·尼古拉斯·塔勒布所説,不要告訴我你的想法,告訴我你的投資組合中有什麼。

With a market capitalization of CN¥9.0b, Jinneng Science&TechologyLtd is a decent size, so it is probably on the radar of institutional investors. In the chart below, we can see that institutional investors have bought into the company. We can zoom in on the different ownership groups, to learn more about Jinneng Science&TechologyLtd.

市值90億元的晉能科技股份有限公司是一個相當大的規模,因此它可能會受到機構投資者的關注。在下面的圖表中,我們可以看到機構投資者買入了該公司的股票。我們可以放大不同的所有制集團,瞭解更多關於金能科技全息有限公司的信息。

View our latest analysis for Jinneng Science&TechologyLtd

查看我們對金能科技全息有限公司的最新分析

SHSE:603113 Ownership Breakdown June 21st 2022
上海證交所:603113所有權明細2022年6月21日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Jinneng Science&TechologyLtd?

關於金能科技股份有限公司,機構持股告訴了我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與經常跟蹤的指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常確實會考慮收購被納入相關基準指數的較大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Jinneng Science&TechologyLtd. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Jinneng Science&TechologyLtd, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

正如你所看到的,機構投資者在金能科技全息有限公司持有相當數量的股份。這可以表明該公司在投資界具有一定的公信力。然而,最好警惕依賴機構投資者帶來的所謂驗證。他們也一樣,有時也會犯錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售一隻股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看一下金能科技全息有限公司過去的盈利軌跡(見下圖)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

SHSE:603113 Earnings and Revenue Growth June 21st 2022
上海證交所:603113的收益和收入增長2022年6月21日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Jinneng Science&TechologyLtd. The company's largest shareholder is Qing Ping Qin, with ownership of 50%. This essentially means that they have extensive influence, if not outright control, over the future of the corporation. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 2.1% and 2.0%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

我們注意到,對衝基金沒有對晉能科技全息有限公司進行有意義的投資。該公司第一大股東為青平勤,持股50%。這本質上意味着他們對公司的未來有廣泛的影響,如果不是完全控制的話。與此同時,第二大和第三大股東分別持有2.1%和2.0%的流通股。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

雖然研究一家公司的機構持股可以增加你的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地瞭解一隻股票的預期表現也是一個很好的做法。雖然有一些分析師的報道,但該公司可能沒有得到廣泛的報道。因此,它可以獲得更多的關注,在賽道上。

Insider Ownership Of Jinneng Science&TechologyLtd

金能科技股份有限公司的內部人所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人的定義可能是主觀的,而且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個別內部人士,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。管理層最終要向董事會負責。然而,經理人擔任執行董事會成員並不少見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官的話。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

內部人持股是積極的,當它標誌着領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時。然而,高內部人持股也可以給公司內部的一個小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of Jinneng Science&Techology Co.,Ltd. This gives them effective control of the company. That means insiders have a very meaningful CN¥4.8b stake in this CN¥9.0b business. Most would argue this is a positive, showing strong alignment with shareholders. You can click here to see if they have been selling down their stake.

我們的信息顯示,內部人擁有津能科技有限公司一半以上的股份,這使他們能夠有效地控制公司。這意味着內部人士在這筆90億元的業務中擁有48億元的股份,這是非常有意義的。大多數人會辯稱,這是積極的,表明了與股東的強烈一致。你可以點擊這裏,看看他們是否一直在減持股份。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 33% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散户投資者在內的普通公眾持有該公司33%的股份,因此不能輕易忽視。這種規模的所有權雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

接下來的步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should be aware of the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Jinneng Science&TechologyLtd .

我發現看看到底是誰擁有一家公司是非常有趣的。但為了真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。為此,您應該意識到2個警告標誌我們已經發現了金能科技全息有限公司。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終這就是未來,而不是過去,這將決定這家企業的所有者將做得多好。因此,我們認為,看看這份免費報告是明智的,它顯示了分析師是否預測到了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數字是使用過去12個月的數據計算的,指的是截至財務報表日期的最後一個月的12個月期間。這可能與全年的年度報告數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎? 保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫。或者,也可以給編輯組發電子郵件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰寫,具有概括性。我們僅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並不打算作為財務建議。它不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況。我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內。Simply Wall St.對上述任何一隻股票都沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論