share_log

Is New World Development Company Limited (HKG:17) Popular Amongst Institutions?

Is New World Development Company Limited (HKG:17) Popular Amongst Institutions?

新世界發展股份有限公司(HKG:17)在機構中受歡迎嗎?
Simply Wall St ·  2022/06/21 03:04

Every investor in New World Development Company Limited (HKG:17) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. Institutions often own shares in more established companies, while it's not unusual to see insiders own a fair bit of smaller companies. Companies that used to be publicly owned tend to have lower insider ownership.

新世界發展股份有限公司(HKG:17)的每一位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東羣體。機構通常持有較成熟公司的股票,而內部人士擁有相當一部分較小公司的情況並不少見。過去屬於公眾所有的公司往往擁有較低的內部人持股比例。

New World Development has a market capitalization of HK$70b, so it's too big to fly under the radar. We'd expect to see both institutions and retail investors owning a portion of the company. Our analysis of the ownership of the company, below, shows that institutional investors have bought into the company. We can zoom in on the different ownership groups, to learn more about New World Development.

新世界發展的市值為700億港元,太大了,不能低調行事。我們預計,機構投資者和散户投資者都將擁有該公司的部分股權。我們對該公司所有權的分析顯示,機構投資者買入了該公司的股票。我們可以放大不同的所有權集團,瞭解更多關於新世界發展的信息。

View our latest analysis for New World Development

查看我們對新世界發展的最新分析

SEHK:17 Ownership Breakdown June 21st 2022
聯交所:17所有權分類2022年6月21日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About New World Development?

關於新世界發展,機構所有制告訴了我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時,以基準來衡量自己,因此一旦一隻股票被納入主要指數,它們往往會對這隻股票變得更加熱情。我們預計,大多數公司都會有一些機構登記在冊,特別是在它們正在增長的情況下。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in New World Development. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see New World Development's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如你所見,機構投資者對新世界發展持有相當多的股份。這意味着為這些機構工作的分析師已經看過了這隻股票,他們喜歡它。但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能錯了。當多家機構持有一隻股票時,它們總是面臨“擁擠交易”的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速拋售股票。在一家沒有增長曆史的公司,這一風險更高。你可以在下面看到新世界發展的歷史收入和收入,但請記住,故事中總是有更多的東西。

SEHK:17 Earnings and Revenue Growth June 21st 2022
聯交所:17盈利及收入增長2022年6月21日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in New World Development. Chow Tai Fook Capital Limited is currently the company's largest shareholder with 45% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 5.3% and 2.1%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

對衝基金對新世界發展的持股並不多。周大福資本有限公司目前是該公司的最大股東,持有45%的流通股。與此同時,第二大和第三大股東分別持有5.3%和2.1%的流通股。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

為了讓我們的研究更有趣,我們發現,前兩名股東擁有公司的多數股權,這意味着他們足夠強大,可以影響公司的決策。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

雖然研究一家公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以瞭解風向也是有意義的。有很多分析師在追蹤這隻股票,所以他們的預測可能也是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of New World Development

新世界發展的內部人所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同國家對內部人的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是算數的。公司管理層對董事會負責,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時最高層管理人員本身也是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

內部人持股是積極的,當它標誌着領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時。然而,高內部人持股也可以給公司內部的一個小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of New World Development Company Limited. We do note, however, it is possible insiders have an indirect interest through a private company or other corporate structure. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own HK$313m worth of shares (at current prices). Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們最新的數據顯示,內部人士持有新世界發展股份有限公司的股份不到1%。然而,我們確實注意到,內部人士可能通過私人公司或其他公司結構擁有間接利益。這是一家非常大的公司,因此如果內部人士擁有該公司很大比例的股份,那將是令人驚訝的。雖然他們的持股量不到1%,但我們可以看到,董事會成員總共擁有價值3.13億港元的股份(按當前價格計算)。可以説,最近的買入和賣出也同樣重要。你可以點擊這裏,看看內部人士是在買入還是賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 40% stake in New World Development. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

通常為個人投資者的普通公眾持有新世界發展40%的股份。儘管這種規模的所有權可能不足以影響有利於他們的政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Company Ownership

私營公司所有權

It seems that Private Companies own 45%, of the New World Development stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

看來,民營企業持有新世界發展45%的股份。私營公司可能是關聯方。有時,內部人士通過持有一傢俬人公司來對上市公司感興趣,而不是以個人身份。雖然很難得出任何大致的中風結論,但值得注意的是,這是一個值得進一步研究的領域。

Next Steps:

接下來的步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for New World Development (2 are significant) that you should be aware of.

雖然考慮擁有一家公司的不同集團是很值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如,我們已經確定新世界發展的3個警示標誌(2個是重要的),這是你應該知道的。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你更願意瞭解分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這一預期免費關於分析師預測的報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數字是使用過去12個月的數據計算的,指的是截至財務報表日期的最後一個月的12個月期間。這可能與全年的年度報告數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎? 保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫。或者,也可以給編輯組發電子郵件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰寫,具有概括性。我們僅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並不打算作為財務建議。它不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況。我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內。Simply Wall St.對上述任何一隻股票都沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論