share_log

Could The Mongolian Mining Corporation (HKG:975) Ownership Structure Tell Us Something Useful?

Could The Mongolian Mining Corporation (HKG:975) Ownership Structure Tell Us Something Useful?

蒙古礦業公司(HKG:975)的所有權結構能告訴我們一些有用的東西嗎?
Simply Wall St ·  2022/06/16 21:28

A look at the shareholders of Mongolian Mining Corporation (HKG:975) can tell us which group is most powerful. Large companies usually have institutions as shareholders, and we usually see insiders owning shares in smaller companies. Warren Buffett said that he likes "a business with enduring competitive advantages that is run by able and owner-oriented people." So it's nice to see some insider ownership, because it may suggest that management is owner-oriented.

看看蒙古礦業公司(HKG:975)的股東就知道哪個集團最有權勢。大公司通常有機構作為股東,我們通常會看到內部人士持有小公司的股份。沃倫·巴菲特説,他喜歡“一家由有能力、以所有者為導向的人經營的、具有持久競爭優勢的企業”。因此,看到一些內部人持股是件好事,因為這可能表明管理層是以所有者為導向的。

Mongolian Mining is not a large company by global standards. It has a market capitalization of HK$2.5b, which means it wouldn't have the attention of many institutional investors. Our analysis of the ownership of the company, below, shows that institutional investors have not yet purchased much of the company. Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Mongolian Mining.

以全球標準來看,蒙古礦業並不是一家大公司。它的市值為25億港元,這意味着它不會受到許多機構投資者的關注。我們對該公司所有權的分析顯示,機構投資者尚未購買該公司的大量股份。讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於蒙古礦業的什麼。

View our latest analysis for Mongolian Mining

查看我們對蒙古礦業的最新分析

SEHK:975 Ownership Breakdown June 16th 2022
聯交所:975所有權明細2022年6月16日

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Mongolian Mining?

關於蒙古礦業,機構所有權的缺失告訴了我們什麼?

Institutional investors often avoid companies that are too small, too illiquid or too risky for their tastes. But it's unusual to see larger companies without any institutional investors.

機構投資者往往會避開那些規模太小、流動性太差或風險太高的公司,這些公司對他們的口味來説太小了。但在沒有任何機構投資者的情況下,看到較大的公司並不常見。

There could be various reasons why no institutions own shares in a company. Typically, small, newly listed companies don't attract much attention from fund managers, because it would not be possible for large fund managers to build a meaningful position in the company. Alternatively, there might be something about the company that has kept institutional investors away. Mongolian Mining might not have the sort of past performance institutions are looking for, or perhaps they simply have not studied the business closely.

為什麼沒有機構持有一家公司的股票,可能有各種原因。通常情況下,新上市的小型公司不會引起基金經理太多關注,因為大型基金管理公司不可能在該公司建立有意義的頭寸。或者,該公司可能有某些方面讓機構投資者望而卻步。蒙古礦業可能沒有機構想要的那種過去的業績,或者他們只是沒有仔細研究過這項業務。

SEHK:975 Earnings and Revenue Growth June 16th 2022
聯交所:975盈利及收入增長2022年6月16日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Mongolian Mining. Our data shows that MCS Holding LLC is the largest shareholder with 31% of shares outstanding. With 7.2% and 4.5% of the shares outstanding respectively, Kerry Mining (Mongolia) Limited and Kerry Group Limited are the second and third largest shareholders.

我們注意到,對衝基金並沒有對蒙古礦業進行有意義的投資。我們的數據顯示,MCS Holding LLC是最大股東,持有31%的流通股。嘉裏礦業(蒙古)有限公司和嘉裏集團有限公司分別持有7.2%和4.5%的流通股,是第二和第三大股東。

We also observed that the top 6 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我們還觀察到,前6名股東佔到了股東名冊的一半以上,少數小股東在一定程度上平衡了大股東的利益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.

雖然研究一家公司的機構持股可以增加你的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地瞭解一隻股票的預期表現也是一個很好的做法。我們的信息顯示,分析師沒有對該股進行任何報道,因此它可能鮮為人知。

Insider Ownership Of Mongolian Mining

蒙古礦業的內部人持股

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

不同國家對內部人的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是算數的。公司管理層管理企業,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

內部人持股是積極的,當它標誌着領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時。然而,高內部人持股也可以給公司內部的一個小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

We can see that insiders own shares in Mongolian Mining Corporation. In their own names, insiders own HK$175m worth of stock in the HK$2.5b company. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們可以看到,內部人士持有蒙古礦業公司的股份。內部人士以個人名義持有這家市值25億港元的公司價值1.75億港元的股票。看到內部人士進行一些投資是好事,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 49% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

包括散户投資者在內的普通公眾持有該公司49%的股份,因此不能輕易忽視。雖然這羣人不一定能發號施令,但它肯定能對公司的運營方式產生真正的影響。

Private Company Ownership

私營公司所有權

It seems that Private Companies own 43%, of the Mongolian Mining stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

看起來,私營公司持有蒙古礦業43%的股份。私營公司可能是關聯方。有時,內部人士通過持有一傢俬人公司來對上市公司感興趣,而不是以個人身份。雖然很難得出任何大致的中風結論,但值得注意的是,這是一個值得進一步研究的領域。

Next Steps:

接下來的步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Be aware that Mongolian Mining is showing 4 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 2 of those are potentially serious...

我發現看看到底是誰擁有一家公司是非常有趣的。但為了真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。請注意,蒙古礦業正在展示我們的投資分析中的4個警告信號,其中兩個可能是嚴重的.

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.

當然了這可能不是最值得購買的股票。。所以讓我們來看看這個免費 免費有趣的公司名單。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數字是使用過去12個月的數據計算的,指的是截至財務報表日期的最後一個月的12個月期間。這可能與全年的年度報告數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎? 保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫。或者,也可以給編輯組發電子郵件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰寫,具有概括性。我們僅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並不打算作為財務建議。它不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況。我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內。Simply Wall St.對上述任何一隻股票都沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論