share_log

What Is The Ownership Structure Like For Huijing Holdings Company Limited (HKG:9968)?

What Is The Ownership Structure Like For Huijing Holdings Company Limited (HKG:9968)?

滙景控股有限公司(HKG:9968)的股權結構如何?
Simply Wall St ·  2022/06/14 20:32

If you want to know who really controls Huijing Holdings Company Limited (HKG:9968), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. Insiders often own a large chunk of younger, smaller, companies while huge companies tend to have institutions as shareholders. Warren Buffett said that he likes "a business with enduring competitive advantages that is run by able and owner-oriented people." So it's nice to see some insider ownership, because it may suggest that management is owner-oriented.

如果你想知道誰真正控制了滙景控股有限公司(HKG:9968),那麼你就得看看它的股票登記簿的構成。內部人士通常持有大量較年輕、規模較小的公司,而大公司往往有機構作為股東。沃倫·巴菲特説,他喜歡“一家由有能力、以所有者為導向的人經營的、具有持久競爭優勢的企業”。因此,看到一些內部人持股是件好事,因為這可能表明管理層是以所有者為導向的。

Huijing Holdings has a market capitalization of HK$9.2b, so we would expect some institutional investors to have noticed the stock. Our analysis of the ownership of the company, below, shows that institutions don't own shares in the company. Let's delve deeper into each type of owner, to discover more about Huijing Holdings.

滙景控股的市值為92億港元,因此我們預計一些機構投資者已經注意到了這隻股票。我們對該公司所有權的分析顯示,機構並不持有該公司的股份。讓我們更深入地研究每種類型的所有者,以瞭解更多關於滙景控股的信息。

View our latest analysis for Huijing Holdings

查看我們對滙景控股的最新分析

SEHK:9968 Ownership Breakdown June 14th 2022
聯交所:9968所有權分類2022年6月14日

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Huijing Holdings?

機構所有權的缺失告訴了我們滙景控股的什麼信息?

Small companies that are not very actively traded often lack institutional investors, but it's less common to see large companies without them.

交易不太活躍的小公司往往缺乏機構投資者,但大公司沒有機構投資者的情況較少。

There are many reasons why a company might not have any institutions on the share registry. It may be hard for institutions to buy large amounts of shares, if liquidity (the amount of shares traded each day) is low. If the company has not needed to raise capital, institutions might lack the opportunity to build a position. Alternatively, there might be something about the company that has kept institutional investors away. Huijing Holdings' earnings and revenue track record (below) may not be compelling to institutional investors -- or they simply might not have looked at the business closely.

一家公司可能沒有在股票登記處登記任何機構的原因有很多。如果流動性(每天交易的股票數量)很低,機構可能很難購買大量股票。如果該公司不需要籌集資金,機構可能缺乏建立頭寸的機會。或者,該公司可能有某些方面讓機構投資者望而卻步。滙景控股的盈利和營收記錄(見下文)對機構投資者來説可能並不令人信服,或者他們可能只是沒有密切關注這項業務。

SEHK:9968 Earnings and Revenue Growth June 14th 2022
聯交所:9968盈利及收入增長2022年6月14日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Huijing Holdings. The company's largest shareholder is Ruixiang Lun, with ownership of 85%. With such a huge stake in the ownership, we infer that they have significant control of the future of the company. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 0.08% and 0.07% of the stock.

我們注意到,對衝基金在滙景控股沒有有意義的投資。公司第一大股東為瑞翔倫,持股85%。由於擁有如此巨大的股權,我們推斷他們對公司的未來擁有重大控制權。相比之下,第二大和第三大股東分別持有約0.08%和0.07%的股份。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.

雖然研究一家公司的機構持股可以增加你的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地瞭解一隻股票的預期表現也是一個很好的做法。我們的信息顯示,分析師沒有對該股進行任何報道,因此它可能鮮為人知。

Insider Ownership Of Huijing Holdings

滙景控股的內部人所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人的定義可能是主觀的,而且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個別內部人士,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理層管理企業,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認為內部人持股是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這會讓其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own the majority of Huijing Holdings Company Limited. This means they can collectively make decisions for the company. Given it has a market cap of HK$9.2b, that means insiders have a whopping HK$7.8b worth of shares in their own names. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been selling any of their shares.

我們最新的數據顯示,內部人士持有滙景控股有限公司的大部分股份。這意味着他們可以集體為公司做出決定。鑑於該公司的市值為92億港元,這意味着內部人士以自己的名義持有價值78億港元的鉅額股票。很高興看到這樣的投資水平。你可以在這裏查看這些內部人士是否一直在出售他們的股票。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 15% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Huijing Holdings. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

持有15%股權的普通公眾,主要由個人投資者組成,對滙景控股有一定程度的影響力。這種規模的所有權雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

接下來的步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should learn about the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Huijing Holdings (including 1 which shouldn't be ignored) .

雖然考慮擁有一家公司的不同集團是很值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。為此,您應該瞭解2個警告標誌我們已經發現了滙景控股(包括1家不應被忽視的公司)。

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.

如果你更願意看看另一家公司--一家財務狀況可能更好的公司--那麼不要錯過這一點免費令人感興趣的公司名單,有強勁的財務數據支持。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數字是使用過去12個月的數據計算的,指的是截至財務報表日期的最後一個月的12個月期間。這可能與全年的年度報告數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎? 保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫。或者,也可以給編輯組發電子郵件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰寫,具有概括性。我們僅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並不打算作為財務建議。它不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況。我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內。Simply Wall St.對上述任何一隻股票都沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論