share_log

What Type Of Shareholders Own The Most Number of Alphamab Oncology (HKG:9966) Shares?

What Type Of Shareholders Own The Most Number of Alphamab Oncology (HKG:9966) Shares?

哪類股東持有Alphamab Oncology(HKG:9966)股份最多?
Simply Wall St ·  2022/05/27 19:21

Every investor in Alphamab Oncology (HKG:9966) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. Generally speaking, as a company grows, institutions will increase their ownership. Conversely, insiders often decrease their ownership over time. Warren Buffett said that he likes "a business with enduring competitive advantages that is run by able and owner-oriented people." So it's nice to see some insider ownership, because it may suggest that management is owner-oriented.

Alphamab Oncology(HKG:9966)的每一位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東羣體。一般來説,隨着公司的成長,機構會增加他們的持股。相反,隨着時間的推移,內部人士往往會減少他們的持股。沃倫·巴菲特説,他喜歡“一家由有能力、以所有者為導向的人經營的、具有持久競爭優勢的企業”。因此,看到一些內部人持股是件好事,因為這可能表明管理層是以所有者為導向的。

Alphamab Oncology is a smaller company with a market capitalization of HK$6.2b, so it may still be flying under the radar of many institutional investors. Our analysis of the ownership of the company, below, shows that institutional investors have bought into the company. Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Alphamab Oncology.

Alphamab Oncology是一家規模較小的公司,市值為62億港元,因此它可能仍在許多機構投資者的雷達下飛行。我們對該公司所有權的分析顯示,機構投資者買入了該公司的股票。讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們關於Alphamab Oncology的什麼。

View our latest analysis for Alphamab Oncology

查看我們對Alphamab腫瘤學的最新分析

SEHK:9966 Ownership Breakdown May 27th 2022
聯交所:9966所有權分類2022年5月27日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Alphamab Oncology?

關於Alphamab腫瘤學,機構所有權告訴了我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與經常跟蹤的指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常確實會考慮收購被納入相關基準指數的較大公司。

We can see that Alphamab Oncology does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Alphamab Oncology, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到,Alphamab Oncology確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司很大一部分股票。這可以表明該公司在投資界具有一定的公信力。然而,最好警惕依賴機構投資者帶來的所謂驗證。他們也一樣,有時也會犯錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售一隻股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看Alphamab Oncology過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

SEHK:9966 Earnings and Revenue Growth May 27th 2022
聯交所:9966盈利及收入增長2022年5月27日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Alphamab Oncology. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Ting Xu with 34% of shares outstanding. The second and third largest shareholders are Xitian Zhang and Chuanxiao Xue, with an equal amount of shares to their name at 9.1%.

對衝基金在Alphamab Oncology的股份並不多。看看我們的數據,我們可以看到,第一大股東是擁有34%流通股的CEO徐霆。第二大股東和第三大股東分別是張喜田和川小雪,持股比例相同,持股比例為9.1%。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 3 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

為了讓我們的研究更有趣,我們發現,前三名股東擁有公司的多數股權,這意味着他們足夠強大,可以影響公司的決策。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然研究一家公司的機構持股可以增加你的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地瞭解一隻股票的預期表現也是一個很好的做法。有相當數量的分析師追蹤該股,因此瞭解他們對未來的總體看法可能是有用的。

Insider Ownership Of Alphamab Oncology

Alphamab腫瘤學的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

儘管對內部人的準確定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認為董事會成員是內部人。公司管理層對董事會負責,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時最高層管理人員本身也是董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認為內部人持股是積極的,因為它可以表明董事會與其他股東很好地結盟。然而,在某些情況下,太多的權力集中在這個羣體中。

Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of Alphamab Oncology. This gives them effective control of the company. So they have a HK$3.3b stake in this HK$6.2b business. Most would argue this is a positive, showing strong alignment with shareholders. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的信息表明,內部人士擁有Alphamab Oncology一半以上的股份。這讓他們有效地控制了公司。因此,他們在這項62億港元的業務中持有33億港元的股份。大多數人會辯稱,這是積極的,表明了與股東的強烈一致。你可以點擊這裏,看看這些內部人士是一直在買入還是賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 35% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散户投資者在內的普通公眾持有該公司35%的股份,因此不能輕易忽視。這種規模的所有權雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私營公司所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 5.3%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我們的數據顯示,私營公司持有該公司5.3%的股份。僅從這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得調查一下誰擁有這些私營公司。有時,內部人士或其他關聯方通過一家獨立的私人公司擁有上市公司的股份。

Next Steps:

接下來的步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that Alphamab Oncology is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about...

雖然考慮擁有一家公司的不同集團是很值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。注意Alphamab腫瘤學正在顯示我們的投資分析中的2個警告信號,你應該知道關於……

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終這就是未來,而不是過去,這將決定這家企業的所有者將做得多好。因此,我們認為,看看這份免費報告是明智的,它顯示了分析師是否預測到了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數字是使用過去12個月的數據計算的,指的是截至財務報表日期的最後一個月的12個月期間。這可能與全年的年度報告數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎? 保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫。或者,也可以給編輯組發電子郵件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰寫,具有概括性。我們僅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並不打算作為財務建議。它不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況。我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內。Simply Wall St.對上述任何一隻股票都沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論