share_log

What You Need To Know About Zall Smart Commerce Group Ltd.'s (HKG:2098) Investor Composition

What You Need To Know About Zall Smart Commerce Group Ltd.'s (HKG:2098) Investor Composition

您需要了解卓爾智能商務集團有限公司(HKG:2098)的投資者構成
Simply Wall St ·  2022/05/23 21:15

A look at the shareholders of Zall Smart Commerce Group Ltd. (HKG:2098) can tell us which group is most powerful. Large companies usually have institutions as shareholders, and we usually see insiders owning shares in smaller companies. I generally like to see some degree of insider ownership, even if only a little. As Nassim Nicholas Taleb said, 'Don't tell me what you think, tell me what you have in your portfolio.

看看卓爾智能商務集團有限公司(HKG:2098)的股東就能知道哪個集團最強大。大公司通常有機構作為股東,我們通常會看到內部人士持有小公司的股份。我通常喜歡看到一定程度的內部人持股,即使只是一小部分。正如納西姆·尼古拉斯·塔勒布所説,不要告訴我你的想法,告訴我你的投資組合中有什麼。

Zall Smart Commerce Group is not a large company by global standards. It has a market capitalization of HK$6.2b, which means it wouldn't have the attention of many institutional investors. Our analysis of the ownership of the company, below, shows that institutions don't own shares in the company. We can zoom in on the different ownership groups, to learn more about Zall Smart Commerce Group.

按照全球標準,卓爾智能商務集團並不是一家大公司。它的市值為62億港元,這意味着它不會受到許多機構投資者的關注。我們對該公司所有權的分析顯示,機構並不持有該公司的股份。我們可以放大不同的所有權組,瞭解有關卓爾智能商務集團的更多信息。

View our latest analysis for Zall Smart Commerce Group

查看我們對卓爾智能商務集團的最新分析

SEHK:2098 Ownership Breakdown May 24th 2022
聯交所:2098年所有權分類2022年5月24日

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Zall Smart Commerce Group?

關於卓爾智能商務集團,缺乏機構所有權告訴了我們什麼?

Small companies that are not very actively traded often lack institutional investors, but it's less common to see large companies without them.

交易不太活躍的小公司往往缺乏機構投資者,但大公司沒有機構投資者的情況較少。

There could be various reasons why no institutions own shares in a company. Typically, small, newly listed companies don't attract much attention from fund managers, because it would not be possible for large fund managers to build a meaningful position in the company. It is also possible that fund managers don't own the stock because they aren't convinced it will perform well. Institutional investors may not find the historic growth of the business impressive, or there might be other factors at play. You can see the past revenue performance of Zall Smart Commerce Group, for yourself, below.

為什麼沒有機構持有一家公司的股票,可能有各種原因。通常情況下,新上市的小型公司不會引起基金經理太多關注,因為大型基金管理公司不可能在該公司建立有意義的頭寸。基金經理也有可能不持有這隻股票,因為他們不相信它會表現良好。機構投資者可能不會覺得這項業務的歷史性增長令人印象深刻,或者可能有其他因素在起作用。您可以在下面看到卓爾智能商務集團過去的收入表現。

SEHK:2098 Earnings and Revenue Growth May 24th 2022
聯交所:2098年盈利及收入增長2022年5月24日

Zall Smart Commerce Group is not owned by hedge funds. With a 65% stake, CEO Zhi Yan is the largest shareholder. With such a huge stake, we infer that they have significant control of the future of the company. It's usually considered a good sign when insiders own a significant number of shares in the company, and in this case, we're glad to see a company insider with such skin in the game. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 0.9% and 0.08% of the stock. Interestingly, the second and third-largest shareholders also happen to be the Top Key Executive and Member of the Board of Directors, respectively. This once again signifies considerable insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.

卓爾智能商務集團並不為對衝基金所有。CEO智彥持有65%的股份,是最大股東。擁有如此龐大的股份,我們推斷他們對公司的未來有很大的控制權。當內部人持有公司大量股份時,這通常被認為是一個好兆頭,在這種情況下,我們很高興看到公司內部人士有這樣的皮膚。相比之下,第二大股東和第三大股東分別持有約0.9%和0.08%的股份。有趣的是,第二大股東和第三大股東恰好也分別是最高管理層和董事會成員。這再次表明該公司的大股東擁有相當大的內部人所有權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.

雖然研究一家公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以瞭解風向也是有意義的。我們的信息顯示,分析師沒有對該股進行任何報道,因此它可能鮮為人知。

Insider Ownership Of Zall Smart Commerce Group

卓爾智能商務集團的內部人士所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

儘管對內部人的準確定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認為董事會成員是內部人。公司管理層對董事會負責,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時最高層管理人員本身也是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

內部人持股是積極的,當它標誌着領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時。然而,高內部人持股也可以給公司內部的一個小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

It seems that insiders own more than half the Zall Smart Commerce Group Ltd. stock. This gives them a lot of power. Given it has a market cap of HK$6.2b, that means they have HK$4.1b worth of shares. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish todiscover (for free) if they have been buying or selling.

看來,內部人士持有卓爾智能商務集團有限公司一半以上的股票。這給了他們很大的權力。鑑於該公司的市值為62億港元,這意味着他們擁有價值41億港元的股票。大多數人會高興地看到董事會與他們一起投資。您可能希望發現(免費)如果他們一直在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 34% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散户投資者在內的普通公眾持有該公司34%的股份,因此不能輕易忽視。這種規模的所有權雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

接下來的步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Zall Smart Commerce Group has 3 warning signs (and 2 which make us uncomfortable) we think you should know about.

雖然考慮擁有一家公司的不同集團是很值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。以風險為例-卓爾智能商務集團3個警示標誌(和2個讓我們不舒服的)我們認為你應該知道。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.

當然了這可能不是最值得購買的股票。。因此,您可能希望看到我們的免費一組有趣的潛在客户,擁有有利的財務狀況。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數字是使用過去12個月的數據計算的,指的是截至財務報表日期的最後一個月的12個月期間。這可能與全年的年度報告數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎? 保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫。或者,也可以給編輯組發電子郵件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰寫,具有概括性。我們僅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並不打算作為財務建議。它不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況。我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內。Simply Wall St.對上述任何一隻股票都沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論