share_log

What Kind Of Shareholders Own City Developments Limited (SGX:C09)?

What Kind Of Shareholders Own City Developments Limited (SGX:C09)?

哪種股東擁有城市發展有限公司(SGX:C09)?
Simply Wall St ·  2022/05/23 20:50

The big shareholder groups in City Developments Limited (SGX:C09) have power over the company. Institutions often own shares in more established companies, while it's not unusual to see insiders own a fair bit of smaller companies. We also tend to see lower insider ownership in companies that were previously publicly owned.

城市發展有限公司(SGX:C09)的大股東集團對該公司擁有控制權。機構通常持有較成熟公司的股票,而內部人士擁有相當一部分較小公司的情況並不少見。我們還傾向於看到,以前為公眾所有的公司的內部人持股比例較低。

With a market capitalization of S$7.3b, City Developments is rather large. We'd expect to see institutional investors on the register. Companies of this size are usually well known to retail investors, too. In the chart below, we can see that institutional investors have bought into the company. We can zoom in on the different ownership groups, to learn more about City Developments.

City Developments的市值為73億新元,規模相當大。我們預計會在登記簿上看到機構投資者。這種規模的公司通常也為散户投資者所熟知。在下面的圖表中,我們可以看到機構投資者買入了該公司的股票。我們可以放大不同的所有權羣體,瞭解更多關於城市發展的信息。

View our latest analysis for City Developments

查看我們對城市發展的最新分析

SGX:C09 Ownership Breakdown May 24th 2022
新交所:C09所有權明細2022年5月24日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About City Developments?

關於城市發展,機構所有制告訴了我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構以一個接近當地市場的指數來衡量它們的表現。因此,他們通常更關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in City Developments. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at City Developments' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

正如你所看到的,機構投資者在City Developments擁有相當多的股份。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因為機構有時會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人一樣。如果多家機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得關注的是City Developments以下的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

SGX:C09 Earnings and Revenue Growth May 24th 2022
新交所:C09收益和收入增長2022年5月24日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in City Developments. The company's largest shareholder is Hong Leong Investment Holdings Pte. Ltd., with ownership of 50%. This essentially means that they have extensive influence, if not outright control, over the future of the corporation. The second and third largest shareholders are BlackRock, Inc. and Euroform (S) Pte. Limited, with an equal amount of shares to their name at 2.2%.

我們注意到,對衝基金在City Developments沒有有意義的投資。該公司的最大股東是宏亮投資控股有限公司。有限公司,持股50%。這本質上意味着他們對公司的未來有廣泛的影響,如果不是完全控制的話。第二和第三大股東是貝萊德公司和Euroform(S)Pte。有限,持股比例相同,持股比例為2.2%。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然研究一家公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以瞭解風向也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師追蹤該股,因此瞭解他們對未來的總體看法可能是有用的。

Insider Ownership Of City Developments

城市發展的內部人所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同國家對內部人的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是算數的。公司管理層對董事會負責,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時最高層管理人員本身也是董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認為內部人持股是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這會讓其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of City Developments Limited. But they may have an indirect interest through a corporate structure that we haven't picked up on. It is a pretty big company, so it would be possible for board members to own a meaningful interest in the company, without owning much of a proportional interest. In this case, they own around S$3.5m worth of shares (at current prices). Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的最新數據顯示,內部人士持有City Development Limited不到1%的股份。但他們可能通過一種我們沒有注意到的公司結構擁有間接利益。它是一家相當大的公司,因此董事會成員有可能在該公司擁有有意義的權益,而不是擁有太多按比例分配的權益。在這種情況下,他們擁有價值約350萬新元的股票(按當前價格計算)。可以説,最近的買入和賣出同樣重要。你可以點擊這裏,看看內部人士是在買入還是賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 34% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over City Developments. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

擁有34%業權的公眾,主要由個人投資者組成,對城市發展項目有一定程度的影響力。這種規模的所有權雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私營公司所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 54%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我們的數據顯示,私營公司持有該公司54%的股份。僅從這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得調查一下誰擁有這些私營公司。有時,內部人士或其他關聯方通過一家獨立的私人公司擁有上市公司的股份。

Next Steps:

接下來的步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for City Developments (1 is concerning) that you should be aware of.

我發現看看到底是誰擁有一家公司是非常有趣的。但為了真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們已經確定城市發展的2個警示標誌(1是關於的)你應該知道的。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終這就是未來,而不是過去,這將決定這家企業的所有者將做得多好。因此,我們認為,看看這份免費報告是明智的,它顯示了分析師是否預測到了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數字是使用過去12個月的數據計算的,指的是截至財務報表日期的最後一個月的12個月期間。這可能與全年的年度報告數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎? 保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫。或者,也可以給編輯組發電子郵件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰寫,具有概括性。我們僅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並不打算作為財務建議。它不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況。我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內。Simply Wall St.對上述任何一隻股票都沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論