share_log

As Chengdu Leejun Industrial (SZSE:002651) lifts 6.9% this past week, investors may now be noticing the company's five-year earnings growth

As Chengdu Leejun Industrial (SZSE:002651) lifts 6.9% this past week, investors may now be noticing the company's five-year earnings growth

隨着成都樂駿實業(SZSE:002651)在過去一週上漲6.9%,投資者現在可能會注意到該公司五年來的收益增長
Simply Wall St ·  2022/05/13 21:08

For many, the main point of investing is to generate higher returns than the overall market. But every investor is virtually certain to have both over-performing and under-performing stocks. So we wouldn't blame long term Chengdu Leejun Industrial Co., Ltd. (SZSE:002651) shareholders for doubting their decision to hold, with the stock down 35% over a half decade. And it's not just long term holders hurting, because the stock is down 28% in the last year. Furthermore, it's down 33% in about a quarter. That's not much fun for holders. But this could be related to the weak market, which is down 14% in the same period.

對許多人來説,投資的主要目的是創造比整體市場更高的回報。但幾乎可以肯定的是,每個投資者都會同時擁有表現優異和表現不佳的股票。所以我們不會責怪長期成都樂駿實業有限公司(SZSE:002651)股東對他們持有股票的決定表示懷疑,該股在過去五年中下跌了35%。受害的不只是長期持有者,因為該股去年下跌了28%。此外,它在大約一個季度內下跌了33%。對於持有者來説,這並不是什麼樂趣。但這可能與疲軟的市場有關,同期市場下跌了14%。

While the last five years has been tough for Chengdu Leejun Industrial shareholders, this past week has shown signs of promise. So let's look at the longer term fundamentals and see if they've been the driver of the negative returns.

儘管過去五年對成都樂駿實業的股東來説是艱難的,但過去一週顯示出了希望的跡象。因此,讓我們看看較長期的基本面,看看它們是否是負回報的驅動因素。

Check out our latest analysis for Chengdu Leejun Industrial

查看我們對成都樂駿實業的最新分析

There is no denying that markets are sometimes efficient, but prices do not always reflect underlying business performance. One imperfect but simple way to consider how the market perception of a company has shifted is to compare the change in the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price movement.

不可否認,市場有時是有效的,但價格並不總是反映潛在的商業表現。一種不完美但簡單的方法來考慮市場對一家公司的看法是如何改變的,那就是將每股收益(EPS)的變化與股價走勢進行比較。

During the unfortunate half decade during which the share price slipped, Chengdu Leejun Industrial actually saw its earnings per share (EPS) improve by 10% per year. So it doesn't seem like EPS is a great guide to understanding how the market is valuing the stock. Alternatively, growth expectations may have been unreasonable in the past.

不幸的是,在股價下滑的五年裏,成都樂駿實業的每股收益(EPS)實際上以每年10%的速度增長。因此,每股收益似乎並不能很好地指導人們理解市場對股票的估值。或者,增長預期在過去可能是不合理的。

Due to the lack of correlation between the EPS growth and the falling share price, it's worth taking a look at other metrics to try to understand the share price movement.

由於每股收益增長和股價下跌之間缺乏相關性,因此有必要看看其他指標,試圖瞭解股價走勢。

In contrast to the share price, revenue has actually increased by 17% a year in the five year period. So it seems one might have to take closer look at the fundamentals to understand why the share price languishes. After all, there may be an opportunity.

與股價形成對比的是,在這五年期間,營收實際上以每年17%的速度增長。因此,人們似乎必須更仔細地觀察基本面,才能理解股價低迷的原因。畢竟,可能會有機會。

You can see below how earnings and revenue have changed over time (discover the exact values by clicking on the image).

你可以在下面看到收入和收入是如何隨着時間的推移而變化的(點擊圖片可以發現確切的價值)。

SZSE:002651 Earnings and Revenue Growth May 14th 2022
深交所:2022年5月14日收益和收入增長002651

If you are thinking of buying or selling Chengdu Leejun Industrial stock, you should check out this FREE detailed report on its balance sheet.

如果你正在考慮買賣成都樂駿實業的股票,你應該看看這個。免費關於其資產負債表的詳細報告。

What About Dividends?

那股息呢?

It is important to consider the total shareholder return, as well as the share price return, for any given stock. Whereas the share price return only reflects the change in the share price, the TSR includes the value of dividends (assuming they were reinvested) and the benefit of any discounted capital raising or spin-off. It's fair to say that the TSR gives a more complete picture for stocks that pay a dividend. We note that for Chengdu Leejun Industrial the TSR over the last 5 years was -31%, which is better than the share price return mentioned above. The dividends paid by the company have thusly boosted the total shareholder return.

重要的是要考慮任何給定股票的總股東回報以及股價回報。雖然股價回報只反映股價的變動,但TSR包括股息的價值(假設股息再投資),以及任何折價集資或分拆所帶來的利益。公平地説,TSR為支付股息的股票提供了更完整的圖景。我們注意到,成都樂駿實業過去5年的TSR為-31%,好於上述股價回報率。該公司支付的股息因此提振了總計股東回報。

A Different Perspective

不同的視角

We regret to report that Chengdu Leejun Industrial shareholders are down 26% for the year (even including dividends). Unfortunately, that's worse than the broader market decline of 13%. However, it could simply be that the share price has been impacted by broader market jitters. It might be worth keeping an eye on the fundamentals, in case there's a good opportunity. Regrettably, last year's performance caps off a bad run, with the shareholders facing a total loss of 6% per year over five years. Generally speaking long term share price weakness can be a bad sign, though contrarian investors might want to research the stock in hope of a turnaround. It's always interesting to track share price performance over the longer term. But to understand Chengdu Leejun Industrial better, we need to consider many other factors. Even so, be aware that Chengdu Leejun Industrial is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those makes us a bit uncomfortable...

我們遺憾地報告,成都樂駿實業股東全年下跌26%(即使包括股息)。不幸的是,這比大盤13%的跌幅還要糟糕。然而,這可能只是因為股價受到了更廣泛的市場緊張情緒的影響。也許有必要關注基本面,以防出現良機。遺憾的是,去年的業績為糟糕的表現畫上了句號,股東們在五年內面臨着每年6%的總虧損。一般來説,股價長期疲軟可能是一個壞信號,儘管反向投資者可能會希望研究這隻股票,希望它能好轉。跟蹤股價的長期表現總是很有趣的。但要更好地瞭解成都樂駿實業,我們還需要考慮許多其他因素。即便如此,請注意成都利駿實業正在展示我們的投資分析中的2個警告信號,其中一條讓我們有點不舒服...

We will like Chengdu Leejun Industrial better if we see some big insider buys. While we wait, check out this free list of growing companies with considerable, recent, insider buying.

如果我們看到一些大的內部收購,我們會更喜歡成都樂駿實業。在我們等待的時候,看看這個免費最近有大量內幕收購的成長型公司名單。

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on CN exchanges.

請注意,本文引用的市場回報反映了目前在CN交易所交易的股票的市場加權平均回報。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎? 保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫。或者,也可以給編輯組發電子郵件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰寫,具有概括性。我們僅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並不打算作為財務建議。它不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況。我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內。Simply Wall St.對上述任何一隻股票都沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論