share_log

What Kind Of Investors Own Most Of IGG Inc (HKG:799)?

What Kind Of Investors Own Most Of IGG Inc (HKG:799)?

哪類投資者持有IGG Inc.(HKG:799)最多的股份?
Simply Wall St ·  2022/05/10 20:26

Every investor in IGG Inc (HKG:799) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. Institutions will often hold stock in bigger companies, and we expect to see insiders owning a noticeable percentage of the smaller ones. Warren Buffett said that he likes "a business with enduring competitive advantages that is run by able and owner-oriented people." So it's nice to see some insider ownership, because it may suggest that management is owner-oriented.

IGG Inc.(HKG:799)的每一位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東羣體。機構通常會持有較大公司的股票,我們預計內部人士將持有較小公司相當比例的股份。沃倫·巴菲特説,他喜歡“一家由有能力、以所有者為導向的人經營的、具有持久競爭優勢的企業”。因此,看到一些內部人持股是件好事,因為這可能表明管理層是以所有者為導向的。

IGG is a smaller company with a market capitalization of HK$3.5b, so it may still be flying under the radar of many institutional investors. Our analysis of the ownership of the company, below, shows that institutional investors have bought into the company. Let's delve deeper into each type of owner, to discover more about IGG.

Ig是一家規模較小的公司,市值為35億港元,因此它可能仍在許多機構投資者的雷達下飛行。我們對該公司所有權的分析顯示,機構投資者買入了該公司的股票。讓我們更深入地研究每種類型的所有者,以發現更多關於IGG的信息。

See our latest analysis for IGG

查看我們對IGG的最新分析

SEHK:799 Ownership Breakdown May 10th 2022
聯交所:799所有權明細2022年5月10日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About IGG?

關於IGG,機構所有權告訴了我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時,以基準來衡量自己,因此一旦一隻股票被納入主要指數,它們往往會對這隻股票變得更加熱情。我們預計,大多數公司都會有一些機構登記在冊,特別是在它們正在增長的情況下。

We can see that IGG does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of IGG, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到,IGG確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司很大一部分股票。這可以表明該公司在投資界具有一定的公信力。然而,最好警惕依賴機構投資者帶來的所謂驗證。他們也一樣,有時也會犯錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售一隻股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看IGG過去的盈利軌跡(見下圖)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

SEHK:799 Earnings and Revenue Growth May 10th 2022
聯交所:799盈利及收入增長2022年5月10日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in IGG. With a 18% stake, CEO Zongjian Cai is the largest shareholder. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 13% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.2% by the third-largest shareholder.

我們注意到,對衝基金沒有對IGG進行有意義的投資。首席執行官蔡宗建持有18%的股份,是最大股東。作為參考,第二大股東持有約13%的流通股,第三大股東持有5.2%的股份。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 17 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

仔細觀察我們的持股數據就會發現,前17名股東總共擁有50%的股份,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有多數股權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究機構持股是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以達到同樣的效果。相當多的分析師追蹤這隻股票,所以你可以很容易地研究預測增長。

Insider Ownership Of IGG

IGG的內部人所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人的定義可能是主觀的,而且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個別內部人士,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理層管理企業,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認為內部人持股是積極的,因為它可以表明董事會與其他股東很好地結盟。然而,在某些情況下,太多的權力集中在這個羣體中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of IGG Inc. It has a market capitalization of just HK$3.5b, and insiders have HK$1.3b worth of shares in their own names. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們的最新數據顯示,內部人士持有IGG公司相當比例的股份。IGG Inc.的市值僅為35億港元,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值13億港元的股票。看到內部人士如此投資於這項業務,真是太好了。或許值得一查的是,這些內部人士最近是否一直在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 46% stake in IGG. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

公眾通常是個人投資者,他們持有IGG 46%的股份。這種規模的所有權雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

接下來的步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for IGG that you should be aware of.

雖然考慮擁有一家公司的不同集團是很值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如,我們已經確定IGG的2個警告標誌這一點你應該知道。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能會想一想這家公司是會增長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份顯示分析師對其未來預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數字是使用過去12個月的數據計算的,指的是截至財務報表日期的最後一個月的12個月期間。這可能與全年的年度報告數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎? 保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫。或者,也可以給編輯組發電子郵件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰寫,具有概括性。我們僅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並不打算作為財務建議。它不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況。我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內。Simply Wall St.對上述任何一隻股票都沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論