share_log

Why China Ludao Technology's (HKG:2023) Soft Earnings Are Just The Beginning Of Its Problems

Why China Ludao Technology's (HKG:2023) Soft Earnings Are Just The Beginning Of Its Problems

為什麼中國綠道科技(HKG:2023)的疲軟收益只是其問題的開始
Simply Wall St ·  2022/05/09 18:42

China Ludao Technology Company Limited (HKG:2023) recently posted soft earnings but shareholders didn't react strongly. Our analysis suggests that they may be missing some concerning details underlying the profit numbers.

中國綠道科技股份有限公司(HKG:2023)最近公佈了疲軟的收益,但股東的反應並不強烈。我們的分析表明,他們可能遺漏了一些與利潤數字相關的細節。

Check out our latest analysis for China Ludao Technology

查看我們對中國綠道科技的最新分析

SEHK:2023 Earnings and Revenue History May 9th 2022
聯交所:2023年盈利及收入歷史2022年5月9日

A Closer Look At China Ludao Technology's Earnings

仔細看看中國陸道科技的收益

In high finance, the key ratio used to measure how well a company converts reported profits into free cash flow (FCF) is the accrual ratio (from cashflow). The accrual ratio subtracts the FCF from the profit for a given period, and divides the result by the average operating assets of the company over that time. This ratio tells us how much of a company's profit is not backed by free cashflow.

在高端金融領域,衡量一家公司將報告利潤轉換為自由現金流(FCF)的程度的關鍵比率是應計比率(來自現金流)。應計制比率從給定期間的利潤中減去FCF,然後將結果除以該時間段內公司的平均運營資產。這個比率告訴我們,一家公司的利潤中有多少不是由自由現金流支持的。

That means a negative accrual ratio is a good thing, because it shows that the company is bringing in more free cash flow than its profit would suggest. While having an accrual ratio above zero is of little concern, we do think it's worth noting when a company has a relatively high accrual ratio. To quote a 2014 paper by Lewellen and Resutek, "firms with higher accruals tend to be less profitable in the future".

這意味着負的應計比率是一件好事,因為它表明該公司帶來的自由現金流比其利潤所暗示的要多。雖然應計比率高於零並不令人擔憂,但我們確實認為,當一家公司的應計比率相對較高時,這一點值得注意。引用勒維倫和雷蘇泰克2014年的一篇論文,“應計利潤較高的公司未來的利潤往往較低”。

China Ludao Technology has an accrual ratio of 0.27 for the year to December 2021. Unfortunately, that means its free cash flow fell significantly short of its reported profits. Even though it reported a profit of CN¥35.5m, a look at free cash flow indicates it actually burnt through CN¥132m in the last year. We also note that China Ludao Technology's free cash flow was actually negative last year as well, so we could understand if shareholders were bothered by its outflow of CN¥132m. Having said that, there is more to the story. The accrual ratio is reflecting the impact of unusual items on statutory profit, at least in part.

在截至2021年12月的一年中,中國綠道科技的應計比率為0.27。不幸的是,這意味着其自由現金流遠遠低於其公佈的利潤。儘管該公司報告利潤為3550萬加元,但看看自由現金流就會發現,該公司去年實際上燒掉了1.32億加元。我們還注意到,中國綠道科技去年的自由現金流實際上也是負的,因此我們可以理解股東是否對其流出的1.32億元人民幣感到困擾。話雖如此,故事中還有更多的東西。應計比率反映了不尋常項目對法定利潤的影響,至少在一定程度上是這樣。

Note: we always recommend investors check balance sheet strength. Click here to be taken to our balance sheet analysis of China Ludao Technology.

注:我們總是建議投資者檢查資產負債表的實力。點擊此處查看我們對中國綠道科技的資產負債表分析。

The Impact Of Unusual Items On Profit

異常項目對利潤的影響

The fact that the company had unusual items boosting profit by CN¥29m, in the last year, probably goes some way to explain why its accrual ratio was so weak. While we like to see profit increases, we tend to be a little more cautious when unusual items have made a big contribution. When we crunched the numbers on thousands of publicly listed companies, we found that a boost from unusual items in a given year is often not repeated the next year. And, after all, that's exactly what the accounting terminology implies. China Ludao Technology had a rather significant contribution from unusual items relative to its profit to December 2021. As a result, we can surmise that the unusual items are making its statutory profit significantly stronger than it would otherwise be.

該公司去年有一些不尋常的項目使利潤增加了2900萬加元,這一事實可能在某種程度上解釋了為什麼它的應計比率如此之低。雖然我們喜歡看到利潤增加,但當不尋常的項目做出了很大貢獻時,我們往往會更加謹慎。當我們分析了數千家上市公司的數據時,我們發現,在給定的一年中,不尋常的項目往往會帶來提振第二年又重複了一遍。畢竟,這正是會計術語所暗示的。與截至2021年12月的利潤相比,中國魯道科技的異常項目做出了相當大的貢獻。因此,我們可以推測,這些不尋常的項目使其法定利潤比其他情況下要強勁得多。

Our Take On China Ludao Technology's Profit Performance

我們對中國綠道科技盈利表現的看法

China Ludao Technology had a weak accrual ratio, but its profit did receive a boost from unusual items. Considering all this we'd argue China Ludao Technology's profits probably give an overly generous impression of its sustainable level of profitability. With this in mind, we wouldn't consider investing in a stock unless we had a thorough understanding of the risks. When we did our research, we found 3 warning signs for China Ludao Technology (2 are concerning!) that we believe deserve your full attention.

中國綠道科技的應計比率較低,但它的利潤確實得到了不尋常項目的提振。考慮到這一切,我們認為中國綠道科技的利潤可能給人一種過於慷慨的印象,表明其可持續的盈利水平。考慮到這一點,除非我們對風險有透徹的瞭解,否則我們不會考慮投資股票。當我們做研究時,我們發現中國綠道科技的3個警示信號(2個是關於!)我們認為這值得你的全力關注。

Our examination of China Ludao Technology has focussed on certain factors that can make its earnings look better than they are. And, on that basis, we are somewhat skeptical. But there are plenty of other ways to inform your opinion of a company. Some people consider a high return on equity to be a good sign of a quality business. While it might take a little research on your behalf, you may find this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks that insiders are buying to be useful.

我們對中國綠道科技的審查集中在某些因素上,這些因素可以讓它的收益看起來比實際情況更好。在此基礎上,我們對此持懷疑態度。但還有很多其他方式可以讓你瞭解一家公司的看法。一些人認為,高股本回報率是高質量企業的良好標誌。雖然這可能需要為您做一些研究,但您可能會發現免費擁有高股本回報率的公司的集合,或者是內部人士購買的有用的股票清單。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎? 保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫。或者,也可以給編輯組發電子郵件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰寫,具有概括性。我們僅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並不打算作為財務建議。它不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況。我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內。Simply Wall St.對上述任何一隻股票都沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論