share_log

Brilliance Technology's (SZSE:300542) Sluggish Earnings Might Be Just The Beginning Of Its Problems

Brilliance Technology's (SZSE:300542) Sluggish Earnings Might Be Just The Beginning Of Its Problems

華晨科技(SZSE:300542)收益低迷可能只是其問題的開始
Simply Wall St ·  2022/05/05 19:42

Brilliance Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300542) stock showed strength after its weak earnings report. While shareholders may be willing to overlook soft profit numbers, we believe that they should also be taking into account some other factors which may be cause for concern.

華晨科技股份有限公司(SZSE:300542)在疲弱的收益報告後,股票表現強勁。雖然股東可能願意忽視疲軟的利潤數字,但我們認為,他們也應該考慮到其他一些可能令人擔憂的因素。

Check out our latest analysis for Brilliance Technology

查看我們對華晨科技的最新分析

SZSE:300542 Earnings and Revenue History May 5th 2022
深交所:300542財報及營收歷史2022年5月5日

A Closer Look At Brilliance Technology's Earnings

仔細看看華晨科技的收益

One key financial ratio used to measure how well a company converts its profit to free cash flow (FCF) is the accrual ratio. To get the accrual ratio we first subtract FCF from profit for a period, and then divide that number by the average operating assets for the period. You could think of the accrual ratio from cashflow as the 'non-FCF profit ratio'.

衡量一家公司將利潤轉換為自由現金流(FCF)的程度的一個關鍵財務比率是應計比率。為了得到應計比率,我們首先從一個時期的利潤中減去FCF,然後用這個數字除以該時期的平均運營資產。你可以把來自現金流的應計比率看作是‘非FCF利潤率’。

As a result, a negative accrual ratio is a positive for the company, and a positive accrual ratio is a negative. That is not intended to imply we should worry about a positive accrual ratio, but it's worth noting where the accrual ratio is rather high. Notably, there is some academic evidence that suggests that a high accrual ratio is a bad sign for near-term profits, generally speaking.

因此,負的應計比率對公司是積極的,而正的應計比率是負的。這並不意味着我們應該擔心應計比率為正,但值得注意的是,在應計比率相當高的地方。值得注意的是,有一些學術證據表明,一般來説,高應計比率對短期利潤來説不是一個好兆頭。

For the year to March 2022, Brilliance Technology had an accrual ratio of 0.26. Unfortunately, that means its free cash flow fell significantly short of its reported profits. Even though it reported a profit of CN¥65.4m, a look at free cash flow indicates it actually burnt through CN¥75m in the last year. It's worth noting that Brilliance Technology generated positive FCF of CN¥169m a year ago, so at least they've done it in the past. The good news for shareholders is that Brilliance Technology's accrual ratio was much better last year, so this year's poor reading might simply be a case of a short term mismatch between profit and FCF. Shareholders should look for improved cashflow relative to profit in the current year, if that is indeed the case.

在截至2022年3月的一年中,華晨科技的應計比率為0.26。不幸的是,這意味着其自由現金流遠遠低於其公佈的利潤。儘管該公司報告利潤為6540萬加元,但看看自由現金流就會發現,該公司去年實際上燒掉了7500萬加元。值得注意的是,華晨科技一年前產生了1.69億元的正FCF,所以至少他們過去做到了。對股東來説,好消息是,華晨科技去年的應計比率要好得多,因此今年的糟糕讀數可能只是利潤和FCF短期錯配的一個例子。如果情況確實如此,股東應該期待本年度相對於利潤的現金流有所改善。

Note: we always recommend investors check balance sheet strength. Click here to be taken to our balance sheet analysis of Brilliance Technology.

注:我們總是建議投資者檢查資產負債表的實力。點擊此處查看我們對華晨科技的資產負債表分析。

Our Take On Brilliance Technology's Profit Performance

我們對華晨科技盈利表現的看法

Brilliance Technology's accrual ratio for the last twelve months signifies cash conversion is less than ideal, which is a negative when it comes to our view of its earnings. Therefore, it seems possible to us that Brilliance Technology's true underlying earnings power is actually less than its statutory profit. But at least holders can take some solace from the 64% per annum growth in EPS for the last three. The goal of this article has been to assess how well we can rely on the statutory earnings to reflect the company's potential, but there is plenty more to consider. If you want to do dive deeper into Brilliance Technology, you'd also look into what risks it is currently facing. Our analysis shows 3 warning signs for Brilliance Technology (1 doesn't sit too well with us!) and we strongly recommend you look at them before investing.

華晨科技過去12個月的應計比率意味着現金轉換不太理想,這對我們對其收益的看法是負面的。因此,在我們看來,華晨科技的真實潛在盈利能力實際上低於其法定利潤是可能的。但至少持有者可以從過去三年每股收益64%的年增長率中得到一些安慰。本文的目的是評估我們可以在多大程度上依賴法定收益來反映公司的潛力,但還有很多東西需要考慮。如果你真的想更深入地研究華晨科技,你還應該調查一下它目前面臨的風險。我們的分析顯示了華晨科技的3個警告信號(1個不太受我們歡迎!)我們強烈建議你在投資之前先看看它們。

This note has only looked at a single factor that sheds light on the nature of Brilliance Technology's profit. But there are plenty of other ways to inform your opinion of a company. For example, many people consider a high return on equity as an indication of favorable business economics, while others like to 'follow the money' and search out stocks that insiders are buying. While it might take a little research on your behalf, you may find this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks that insiders are buying to be useful.

這份報告只關注了一個因素,它揭示了華晨科技的利潤本質。但還有很多其他方式可以讓你瞭解一家公司的看法。例如,許多人認為高股本回報率是有利的商業經濟指標,而另一些人則喜歡“跟着錢走”,尋找內部人士正在買入的股票。雖然這可能需要為您做一些研究,但您可能會發現免費擁有高股本回報率的公司的集合,或者是內部人士購買的有用的股票清單。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫。或者,也可以給編輯組發電子郵件,地址是implywallst.com。
這篇由《華爾街日報》撰寫的文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並不打算作為財務建議。它不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況。我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內。簡單地説,華爾街在提到的任何股票中都沒有頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論