share_log

What Kind Of Shareholders Hold The Majority In EEKA Fashion Holdings Limited's (HKG:3709) Shares?

What Kind Of Shareholders Hold The Majority In EEKA Fashion Holdings Limited's (HKG:3709) Shares?

什麼類型的股東持有EEKA Fashion Holdings Limited(HKG:3709)的多數股權?
Simply Wall St ·  2022/05/01 20:31

Every investor in EEKA Fashion Holdings Limited (HKG:3709) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. Institutions often own shares in more established companies, while it's not unusual to see insiders own a fair bit of smaller companies. Warren Buffett said that he likes "a business with enduring competitive advantages that is run by able and owner-oriented people." So it's nice to see some insider ownership, because it may suggest that management is owner-oriented.

EEKA Fashion Holdings Limited(HKG:3709)的每一位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東羣體。機構通常持有較成熟公司的股票,而內部人士擁有相當一部分較小公司的情況並不少見。沃倫·巴菲特説,他喜歡“一家由有能力、以所有者為導向的人經營的、具有持久競爭優勢的企業”。因此,看到一些內部人持股是件好事,因為這可能表明管理層是以所有者為導向的。

With a market capitalization of HK$8.7b, EEKA Fashion Holdings is a decent size, so it is probably on the radar of institutional investors. Taking a look at our data on the ownership groups (below), it seems that institutions are not really that prevalent on the share registry. We can zoom in on the different ownership groups, to learn more about EEKA Fashion Holdings.

市值87億港元的EEKA Fashion Holdings是一個相當大的規模,因此很可能在機構投資者的雷達上。看看我們關於所有權組的數據(如下),似乎機構在股票登記處並不是真的那麼普遍。我們可以放大不同的所有權集團,瞭解更多關於EEKA時尚控股公司的信息。

Check out our latest analysis for EEKA Fashion Holdings

查看我們對EEKA時尚控股公司的最新分析

SEHK:3709 Ownership Breakdown May 2nd 2022
聯交所:3709所有權分類2022年5月2日

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About EEKA Fashion Holdings?

缺乏機構所有權告訴了我們關於EEKA時尚控股公司的什麼?

Institutional investors often avoid companies that are too small, too illiquid or too risky for their tastes. But it's unusual to see larger companies without any institutional investors.

機構投資者往往會避開那些規模太小、流動性太差或風險太高的公司,這些公司對他們的口味來説太小了。但在沒有任何機構投資者的情況下,看到較大的公司並不常見。

There could be various reasons why no institutions own shares in a company. Typically, small, newly listed companies don't attract much attention from fund managers, because it would not be possible for large fund managers to build a meaningful position in the company. Alternatively, there might be something about the company that has kept institutional investors away. EEKA Fashion Holdings might not have the sort of past performance institutions are looking for, or perhaps they simply have not studied the business closely.

為什麼沒有機構持有一家公司的股票,可能有各種原因。通常情況下,新上市的小型公司不會引起基金經理太多關注,因為大型基金管理公司不可能在該公司建立有意義的頭寸。或者,該公司可能有某些方面讓機構投資者望而卻步。Eeeka Fashion Holdings可能沒有機構想要的那種過去的表現,或者他們只是沒有仔細研究過這項業務。

SEHK:3709 Earnings and Revenue Growth May 2nd 2022
聯交所:3709盈利及收入增長2022年5月2日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in EEKA Fashion Holdings. The company's CEO Ming Jin is the largest shareholder with 40% of shares outstanding. Rui Jin is the second largest shareholder owning 29% of common stock, and Hongmei He holds about 0.2% of the company stock. Interestingly, the second and third-largest shareholders also happen to be the Senior Key Executive and Member of the Board of Directors, respectively. This once again signifies considerable insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.

我們注意到,對衝基金沒有對EEKA Fashion Holdings進行有意義的投資。該公司首席執行官金明是最大股東,持有40%的流通股。瑞金是第二大股東,持有29%的普通股,紅梅和持有約0.2%的公司股份。有趣的是,第二大股東和第三大股東恰好也分別是高級關鍵高管和董事會成員。這再次表明該公司的大股東擁有相當大的內部人所有權。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 2 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.

在進一步挖掘後,我們發現,前兩名股東共同控制着公司一半以上的股份,這意味着他們擁有相當大的權力來影響公司的決策。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.

研究機構持股是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以達到同樣的效果。有一些分析師對該股的報道,但隨着時間的推移,它仍可能變得更加廣為人知。

Insider Ownership Of EEKA Fashion Holdings

EEKA時尚控股的內部人所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

儘管對內部人的準確定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認為董事會成員是內部人。公司管理層管理企業,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

內部人持股是積極的,當它標誌着領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時。然而,高內部人持股也可以給公司內部的一個小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own the majority of EEKA Fashion Holdings Limited. This means they can collectively make decisions for the company. Given it has a market cap of HK$8.7b, that means insiders have a whopping HK$6.0b worth of shares in their own names. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been selling any of their shares.

我們最新的數據顯示,內部人士擁有EEKA時尚控股有限公司的大部分股份。這意味着他們可以集體為公司做出決定。鑑於其市值為87億港元,這意味着內部人士以自己的名義持有價值高達60億港元的股票。很高興看到這樣的投資水平。你可以在這裏查看這些內部人士是否一直在出售他們的股票。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 31% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

包括散户投資者在內的普通公眾持有該公司31%的股份,因此不能輕易忽視。雖然這羣人不一定能發號施令,但它肯定能對公司的運營方式產生真正的影響。

Next Steps:

接下來的步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand EEKA Fashion Holdings better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 2 warning signs we've spotted with EEKA Fashion Holdings .

擁有一家公司股票的不同集團總是值得考慮的。但為了更好地理解EEKA Fashion Holdings,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。為此,你應該注意到我們在EEKA時尚控股公司發現的兩個警告信號。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終這就是未來,而不是過去,這將決定這家企業的所有者將做得多好。因此,我們認為,看看這份免費報告是明智的,它顯示了分析師是否預測到了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數字是使用過去12個月的數據計算的,指的是截至財務報表日期的最後一個月的12個月期間。這可能與全年的年度報告數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫。或者,也可以給編輯組發電子郵件,地址是implywallst.com。
這篇由《華爾街日報》撰寫的文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並不打算作為財務建議。它不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況。我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內。簡單地説,華爾街在提到的任何股票中都沒有頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論