share_log

Weak Statutory Earnings May Not Tell The Whole Story For Zhejiang Lante Optics (SHSE:688127)

Weak Statutory Earnings May Not Tell The Whole Story For Zhejiang Lante Optics (SHSE:688127)

疲弱的法定收益可能不能説明浙江朗特光學的全部故事(上交所:688127)
Simply Wall St ·  2022/04/28 19:37

A lackluster earnings announcement from Zhejiang Lante Optics Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688127) last week didn't sink the stock price. We think that investors are worried about some weaknesses underlying the earnings.

一份平淡無奇的財報浙江朗特光學有限公司。(上海證券交易所:688127)上週的股價並沒有下跌。我們認為,投資者擔心的是盈利背後的一些弱點。

See our latest analysis for Zhejiang Lante Optics

查看我們對浙江藍特光學的最新分析

SHSE:688127 Earnings and Revenue History April 28th 2022
上海證交所:688127收益和收入歷史2022年4月28日

Zooming In On Zhejiang Lante Optics' Earnings

放大浙江蘭特光學公司的收益

In high finance, the key ratio used to measure how well a company converts reported profits into free cash flow (FCF) is the accrual ratio (from cashflow). To get the accrual ratio we first subtract FCF from profit for a period, and then divide that number by the average operating assets for the period. This ratio tells us how much of a company's profit is not backed by free cashflow.

在高端金融領域,衡量一家公司將報告利潤轉換為自由現金流(FCF)的程度的關鍵比率是應計比率(來自現金流)。為了得到應計比率,我們首先從一個時期的利潤中減去FCF,然後用這個數字除以該時期的平均運營資產。這個比率告訴我們,一家公司的利潤中有多少不是由自由現金流支持的。

As a result, a negative accrual ratio is a positive for the company, and a positive accrual ratio is a negative. While having an accrual ratio above zero is of little concern, we do think it's worth noting when a company has a relatively high accrual ratio. To quote a 2014 paper by Lewellen and Resutek, "firms with higher accruals tend to be less profitable in the future".

因此,負的應計比率對公司是積極的,而正的應計比率是負的。雖然應計比率高於零並不令人擔憂,但我們確實認為,當一家公司的應計比率相對較高時,這一點值得注意。引用勒維倫和雷蘇泰克2014年的一篇論文,“應計利潤較高的公司未來的利潤往往較低”。

For the year to March 2022, Zhejiang Lante Optics had an accrual ratio of 0.22. Unfortunately, that means its free cash flow fell significantly short of its reported profits. Even though it reported a profit of CN¥123.2m, a look at free cash flow indicates it actually burnt through CN¥16m in the last year. We saw that FCF was CN¥164m a year ago though, so Zhejiang Lante Optics has at least been able to generate positive FCF in the past. However, that's not all there is to consider. We can see that unusual items have impacted its statutory profit, and therefore the accrual ratio.

在截至2022年3月的一年中,浙江藍特光學的應計比率為0.22。不幸的是,這意味着其自由現金流遠遠低於其公佈的利潤。儘管它報告了1.232億加元的利潤,但看看自由現金流就會發現,它在去年實際上燒掉了1600萬加元。我們看到一年前的FCF是1.64億元人民幣,所以浙江朗特光學至少在過去能夠產生正的FCF。然而,這並不是需要考慮的全部問題。我們可以看到,不尋常的項目影響了其法定利潤,從而影響了應計比率。

That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates.

這可能會讓你想知道,分析師對未來盈利能力的預測是什麼。幸運的是,您可以單擊此處查看基於他們估計的未來盈利能力的互動圖表。

How Do Unusual Items Influence Profit?

不尋常的項目如何影響利潤?

The fact that the company had unusual items boosting profit by CN¥15m, in the last year, probably goes some way to explain why its accrual ratio was so weak. While we like to see profit increases, we tend to be a little more cautious when unusual items have made a big contribution. When we analysed the vast majority of listed companies worldwide, we found that significant unusual items are often not repeated. And that's as you'd expect, given these boosts are described as 'unusual'. Assuming those unusual items don't show up again in the current year, we'd thus expect profit to be weaker next year (in the absence of business growth, that is).

該公司去年有一些不尋常的項目使利潤增加了1500萬加元,這一事實可能在某種程度上解釋了為什麼它的應計比率如此之低。雖然我們喜歡看到利潤增加,但當不尋常的項目做出了很大貢獻時,我們往往會更加謹慎。當我們分析全球絕大多數上市公司時,我們發現重大的不尋常項目往往不會重複。考慮到這些提振被描述為“不尋常的”,這正如你所預期的那樣。假設這些不同尋常的項目在本年度不會再次出現,我們因此預計明年的利潤會更弱(也就是説,在沒有業務增長的情況下)。

Our Take On Zhejiang Lante Optics' Profit Performance

我們對浙江朗特光學公司盈利表現的看法

Summing up, Zhejiang Lante Optics received a nice boost to profit from unusual items, but could not match its paper profit with free cash flow. Considering all this we'd argue Zhejiang Lante Optics' profits probably give an overly generous impression of its sustainable level of profitability. With this in mind, we wouldn't consider investing in a stock unless we had a thorough understanding of the risks. When we did our research, we found 3 warning signs for Zhejiang Lante Optics (1 is a bit unpleasant!) that we believe deserve your full attention.

綜上所述,浙江藍特光學從異常項目中獲利獲得不錯的提振,但無法將賬面利潤與自由現金流相匹配。考慮到這一切,我們認為浙江藍特光學的利潤可能給人一種過於慷慨的印象,表明其可持續的盈利水平。考慮到這一點,除非我們對風險有透徹的瞭解,否則我們不會考慮投資股票。當我們做研究時,我們發現了浙江藍天光學的3個警告標誌(1個有點不舒服!)我們認為這值得你的全力關注。

In this article we've looked at a number of factors that can impair the utility of profit numbers, and we've come away cautious. But there are plenty of other ways to inform your opinion of a company. For example, many people consider a high return on equity as an indication of favorable business economics, while others like to 'follow the money' and search out stocks that insiders are buying. While it might take a little research on your behalf, you may find this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks that insiders are buying to be useful.

在這篇文章中,我們研究了一些可能削弱利潤數字效用的因素,我們對此持謹慎態度。但還有很多其他方式可以讓你瞭解一家公司的看法。例如,許多人認為高股本回報率是有利的商業經濟指標,而另一些人則喜歡“跟着錢走”,尋找內部人士正在買入的股票。雖然這可能需要為您做一些研究,但您可能會發現免費擁有高股本回報率的公司的集合,或者是內部人士購買的有用的股票清單。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫。或者,也可以給編輯組發電子郵件,地址是implywallst.com。
這篇由《華爾街日報》撰寫的文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並不打算作為財務建議。它不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況。我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內。簡單地説,華爾街在提到的任何股票中都沒有頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論