share_log

Could The Ocumension Therapeutics (HKG:1477) Ownership Structure Tell Us Something Useful?

Could The Ocumension Therapeutics (HKG:1477) Ownership Structure Tell Us Something Useful?

Ocumension Treeutics(HKG:1477)的所有權結構能告訴我們一些有用的東西嗎?
Simply Wall St ·  2022/04/27 19:21

Every investor in Ocumension Therapeutics (HKG:1477) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. Insiders often own a large chunk of younger, smaller, companies while huge companies tend to have institutions as shareholders. Warren Buffett said that he likes "a business with enduring competitive advantages that is run by able and owner-oriented people." So it's nice to see some insider ownership, because it may suggest that management is owner-oriented.

Ocumension Treateutics(HKG:1477)的每一位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東羣體。內部人士通常持有大量較年輕、規模較小的公司,而大公司往往有機構作為股東。沃倫·巴菲特説,他喜歡“一家由有能力、以所有者為導向的人經營的、具有持久競爭優勢的企業”。因此,看到一些內部人持股是件好事,因為這可能表明管理層是以所有者為導向的。

Ocumension Therapeutics has a market capitalization of HK$6.5b, so we would expect some institutional investors to have noticed the stock. In the chart below, we can see that institutional investors have bought into the company. We can zoom in on the different ownership groups, to learn more about Ocumension Therapeutics.

Ocumension Treeutics的市值為65億港元,因此我們預計一些機構投資者已經注意到了這隻股票。在下面的圖表中,我們可以看到機構投資者買入了該公司的股票。我們可以放大不同的所有權集團,以瞭解更多關於Ocumension Treeutics的信息。

See our latest analysis for Ocumension Therapeutics

查看我們對Ocumension Treeutics的最新分析

SEHK:1477 Ownership Breakdown April 27th 2022
聯交所:1477所有權分類2022年4月27日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Ocumension Therapeutics?

機構所有權告訴了我們什麼關於佔領治療的信息?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與經常跟蹤的指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常確實會考慮收購被納入相關基準指數的較大公司。

We can see that Ocumension Therapeutics does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Ocumension Therapeutics, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到,Ocumension Treeutics確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司很大一部分股票。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因為機構有時會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人一樣。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售一隻股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看Ocumension Treateutics過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

SEHK:1477 Earnings and Revenue Growth April 27th 2022
聯交所:1477盈利及收入增長2022年4月27日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Ocumension Therapeutics. Our data shows that 6 Dimensions Capital, L.P. is the largest shareholder with 25% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 13% and 12% of the stock. In addition, we found that Ye Liu, the CEO has 2.1% of the shares allocated to their name.

對衝基金在Ocumension Treateutics的股份並不多。我們的數據顯示,6Dimensions Capital,L.P.是最大的股東,持有25%的流通股。相比之下,第二大和第三大股東分別持有約13%和12%的股份。此外,我們發現,葉劉的CEO有2.1%的股份分配給了他們的名字。

Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 59% of the company is controlled by the top 4 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business.

我們的研究還揭示了這樣一個事實,即公司約59%的股份由前4名股東控制,這表明這些所有者對業務具有重大影響。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

雖然研究一家公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以瞭解風向也是有意義的。有很多分析師在追蹤這隻股票,所以他們的預測可能也是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of Ocumension Therapeutics

Ocumension治療公司的內部人所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人的定義可能是主觀的,而且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個別內部人士,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。管理層最終要向董事會負責。然而,經理人擔任執行董事會成員並不少見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官的話。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認為內部人持股是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這會讓其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Ocumension Therapeutics. Insiders have a HK$1.0b stake in this HK$6.5b business. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們的最新數據表明,內部人士擁有Ocumension Treateutics的合理比例。在這筆65億港元的交易中,內部人士持有10億港元的股份。看到內部人士如此投資於這項業務,真是太好了。或許值得一查的是,這些內部人士最近是否一直在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 26% stake in Ocumension Therapeutics. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通公眾通常是個人投資者,他們持有Ocumension Treeutics 26%的股份。儘管這種規模的所有權可能不足以影響有利於他們的政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

With a stake of 45%, private equity firms could influence the Ocumension Therapeutics board. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

私募股權公司持有45%的股份,可能會影響Ocumension治療公司的董事會。一些人可能會喜歡這樣,因為私人股本有時是讓管理層承擔責任的積極分子。但在其他時候,私募股權公司讓公司上市後,它們的股票都賣光了。

Next Steps:

接下來的步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Ocumension Therapeutics better, we need to consider many other factors. Be aware that Ocumension Therapeutics is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about...

擁有一家公司股票的不同集團總是值得考慮的。但為了更好地理解Ocumension治療,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。請注意,我們的投資分析中顯示了兩個警告信號,您應該知道...

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終這就是未來,而不是過去,這將決定這家企業的所有者將做得多好。因此,我們認為,看看這份免費報告是明智的,它顯示了分析師是否預測到了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數字是使用過去12個月的數據計算的,指的是截至財務報表日期的最後一個月的12個月期間。這可能與全年的年度報告數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫。或者,也可以給編輯組發電子郵件,地址是implywallst.com。
這篇由《華爾街日報》撰寫的文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並不打算作為財務建議。它不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況。我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內。簡單地説,華爾街在提到的任何股票中都沒有頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論