share_log

Institutional Owners May Take Dramatic Actions as Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc.'s (NYSE:RGR) Recent 8.0% Drop Adds to One-year Losses

Institutional Owners May Take Dramatic Actions as Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc.'s (NYSE:RGR) Recent 8.0% Drop Adds to One-year Losses

機構所有者可能會像Sturm、Ruger & Company, Inc.那樣採取重大行動。”s(紐約證券交易所代碼:RGR)最近8.0%的跌幅增加了一年的虧損
Simply Wall St ·  05/09 08:31

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Sturm Ruger implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • The top 11 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 機構持有Sturm Ruger的大量股權意味着它們對公司的股價具有重大影響
  • 前11名股東擁有公司50%的股份
  • 使用公司過去業績的數據以及所有權研究,可以更好地評估公司的未來表現

Every investor in Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. (NYSE:RGR) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 61% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc.(紐約證券交易所代碼:RGR)的每位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東群體。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲61%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。

And institutional investors saw their holdings value drop by 8.0% last week. Needless to say, the recent loss which further adds to the one-year loss to shareholders of 18% might not go down well especially with this category of shareholders. Often called "market movers", institutions wield significant power in influencing the price dynamics of any stock. As a result, if the decline continues, institutional investors may be pressured to sell Sturm Ruger which might hurt individual investors.

上週,機構投資者的持股價值下降了8.0%。毋庸置疑,最近的虧損進一步增加了18%的股東一年虧損,但下降幅度可能不大,尤其是對於這類股東而言。機構通常被稱爲 “市場推動者”,在影響任何股票的價格動態方面擁有強大的力量。因此,如果繼續下跌,機構投資者可能會被迫出售Sturm Ruger,這可能會傷害個人投資者。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Sturm Ruger.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於Sturm Ruger的什麼。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:RGR Ownership Breakdown May 9th 2024
紐約證券交易所:RGR 所有權明細 2024 年 5 月 9 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Sturm Ruger?

關於斯特姆·魯格,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Sturm Ruger. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Sturm Ruger's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如你所見,機構投資者在Sturm Ruger中擁有相當數量的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也是,有時候會弄錯。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到Sturm Ruger的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:RGR Earnings and Revenue Growth May 9th 2024
紐約證券交易所:RGR 收益和收入增長 2024 年 5 月 9 日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. It would appear that 5.5% of Sturm Ruger shares are controlled by hedge funds. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. The company's largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc., with ownership of 18%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 12% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.5% by the third-largest shareholder. Additionally, the company's CEO Christopher Killoy directly holds 0.7% of the total shares outstanding.

機構投資者擁有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能會對董事會的決策產生重大影響。看來Sturm Ruger有5.5%的股票是由對沖基金控制的。這值得注意,因爲對沖基金通常是非常活躍的投資者,他們可能會試圖影響管理層。許多人希望在短期或中期內看到價值創造(以及更高的股價)。該公司的最大股東是貝萊德公司,所有權爲18%。就背景而言,第二大股東持有約12%的已發行股份,其次是第三大股東持有5.5%的所有權。此外,該公司首席執行官克里斯托弗·基洛伊直接持有已發行股份總額的0.7%。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 11 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

仔細觀察我們的所有權數據就會發現,前11名股東的合併所有權爲50%,這意味着沒有一個股東擁有多數股東。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。分析師對該股的報道很少,但報道不多。因此,它還有獲得更多報道的餘地。

Insider Ownership Of Sturm Ruger

Sturm Ruger 的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。管理層最終向董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行董事會成員的情況並不少見,特別是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc.. In their own names, insiders own US$20m worth of stock in the US$750m company. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們可以報告說,內部人士確實擁有Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc.的股份。內部人士以自己的名義擁有這家價值7.5億美元的公司價值2000萬美元的股票。很高興看到內部人士進行一些投資,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 31% stake in Sturm Ruger. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有Sturm Ruger31%的股份。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with Sturm Ruger , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,投資風險的幽靈無處不在。我們已經向Sturm Ruger確定了兩個警告信號,了解它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

歸根結底,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問這份關於公司分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論