share_log

Institutional Investors in Longboard Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ:LBPH) See US$68m Decrease in Market Cap Last Week, Although Long-term Gains Have Benefitted Them.

Institutional Investors in Longboard Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ:LBPH) See US$68m Decrease in Market Cap Last Week, Although Long-term Gains Have Benefitted Them.

Longboard Pharmicals, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:LBPH)的機構投資者上週的市值減少了6800萬美元,儘管長期收益使他們受益。
Simply Wall St ·  04/20 09:08

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Longboard Pharmaceuticals implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 8 shareholders
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 機構對Longboard Pharmicals的大量持股意味着它們對該公司的股價具有重大影響
  • 50% 的業務由前 8 名股東持有
  • 分析師的預測以及所有權數據可以使人們對企業前景有深刻的了解

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Longboard Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ:LBPH), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 47% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要了解誰真正控制了Longboard Pharmicals, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:LBPH),了解該業務的所有權結構非常重要。持有該公司股份最多的集團是機構,準確地說約爲47%。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

Institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's market cap fell by US$68m last week. However, the 141% one-year return to shareholders may have helped lessen their pain. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.

上週該公司的市值下降了6800萬美元后,機構投資者遭受了最大的損失。但是,141%的股東一年回報率可能有助於減輕他們的痛苦。但是,他們應該注意將來的進一步損失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Longboard Pharmaceuticals.

在下圖中,我們放大了Longboard Pharmicals的不同所有權群體。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGM:LBPH Ownership Breakdown April 20th 2024
納斯達克通用汽車公司:LBPH 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 20 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Longboard Pharmaceuticals?

關於長板製藥,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

We can see that Longboard Pharmaceuticals does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Longboard Pharmaceuticals' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到,Longboard Pharmicals確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司很大一部分股票。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看Longboard Pharmicals的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGM:LBPH Earnings and Revenue Growth April 20th 2024
納斯達克通用汽車公司:LBPH 收益和收入增長 2024 年 4 月 20 日

Our data indicates that hedge funds own 15% of Longboard Pharmaceuticals. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. Our data shows that FMR LLC is the largest shareholder with 16% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.8% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 7.9% by the third-largest shareholder. Furthermore, CEO Kevin Lind is the owner of 0.9% of the company's shares.

我們的數據顯示,對沖基金擁有朗博德製藥15%的股份。這很有趣,因爲對沖基金可以非常活躍和活躍。許多人正在尋找推動股價上漲的中期催化劑。我們的數據顯示,FMR LLC是最大的股東,已發行股份的16%。就背景而言,第二大股東持有約8.8%的已發行股份,其次是第三大股東持有7.9%的所有權。此外,首席執行官凱文·林德是該公司0.9%股份的所有者。

We did some more digging and found that 8 of the top shareholders account for roughly 50% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們進一步挖掘發現,前大股東中有8人約佔登記冊的50%,這意味着除了較大的股東外,還有一些較小的股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of Longboard Pharmaceuticals

朗博德製藥的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our information suggests that Longboard Pharmaceuticals, Inc. insiders own under 1% of the company. It has a market capitalization of just US$678m, and the board has only US$6.1m worth of shares in their own names. Many tend to prefer to see a board with bigger shareholdings. A good next step might be to take a look at this free summary of insider buying and selling.

我們的信息表明,Longboard Pharmicals, Inc.內部人士擁有該公司不到1%的股份。它的市值僅爲6.78億美元,董事會以自己的名義持有價值610萬美元的股票。許多人傾向於看到一個擁有更多股權的董事會。一個不錯的下一步可能是看看這份免費的內幕買入和賣出摘要。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 29% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司29%的股份,因此不容忽視。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

Private equity firms hold a 7.9% stake in Longboard Pharmaceuticals. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

私募股權公司持有朗博德製藥7.9%的股份。這表明他們可以在關鍵政策決策中發揮影響力。有些人可能會喜歡這樣,因爲私募股權有時是追究管理層責任的激進分子。但是其他時候,私募股權在公司上市後正在售罄。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Longboard Pharmaceuticals better, we need to consider many other factors. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 4 warning signs for Longboard Pharmaceuticals (of which 3 are potentially serious!) you should know about.

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解Longboard Pharmicals,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。比如風險。每家公司都有警告,我們已經發現了Longboard Pharmicals的4個警告信號(其中3個可能很嚴重!)你應該知道。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論