share_log

Public Companies Among Ping An Healthcare and Technology Company Limited's (HKG:1833) Largest Stockholders and Were Hit After Last Week's 15% Price Drop

Public Companies Among Ping An Healthcare and Technology Company Limited's (HKG:1833) Largest Stockholders and Were Hit After Last Week's 15% Price Drop

上市公司是平安醫療科技股份有限公司(HKG: 1833)的最大股東,在上週股價下跌15%後受到打擊
Simply Wall St ·  04/17 19:30

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significant control over Ping An Healthcare and Technology by public companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • A total of 3 investors have a majority stake in the company with 53% ownership
  • Institutional ownership in Ping An Healthcare and Technology is 15%
  • 上市公司對平安醫療科技的嚴格控制意味着公衆擁有更大的影響管理和治理相關決策的權力
  • 共有3名投資者擁有該公司的多數股權,擁有53%的所有權
  • 平安醫療科技的機構所有權爲15%

Every investor in Ping An Healthcare and Technology Company Limited (HKG:1833) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are public companies with 48% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

平安醫療科技股份有限公司(HKG: 1833)的每位投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。而持有最大份額的集團是擁有48%所有權的上市公司。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。

And last week, public companies endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 15%.

上週,上市公司遭受了最大的損失,股價下跌了15%。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Ping An Healthcare and Technology.

在下圖中,我們放大了平安醫療科技的不同所有權群體。

ownership-breakdown
SEHK:1833 Ownership Breakdown April 17th 2024
SEHK: 1833 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 17 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Ping An Healthcare and Technology?

關於平安醫療和科技,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

Ping An Healthcare and Technology already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Ping An Healthcare and Technology's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

平安醫療科技已經在股份登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也是,有時候會弄錯。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看平安醫療科技的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SEHK:1833 Earnings and Revenue Growth April 17th 2024
SEHK: 1833 2024年4月17日收益及收入增長

Ping An Healthcare and Technology is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that Ping An Insurance (Group) Company of China, Ltd. is the largest shareholder with 39% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 8.7% and 5.0%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

平安醫療科技不歸對沖基金所有。我們的數據顯示,中國平安保險(集團)股份有限公司是最大股東,已發行股份的39%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的8.7%和5.0%。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 3 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.

在進一步挖掘之後,我們發現前三名股東共同控制了公司一半以上的股份,這意味着他們擁有影響公司決策的巨大權力。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Ping An Healthcare and Technology

平安醫療與科技的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層對董事會的回答,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Ping An Healthcare and Technology Company Limited. We do note, however, it is possible insiders have an indirect interest through a private company or other corporate structure. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own HK$4.9m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們最新的數據顯示,內部人士擁有平安醫療科技有限公司不到1%的股份。但是,我們確實注意到,內部人士有可能通過私營公司或其他公司結構獲得間接利益。請記住,這是一家大公司,內部人士擁有價值490萬港元的股票。絕對值可能比比例份額更重要。看到董事會成員擁有股票是件好事,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 32% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Ping An Healthcare and Technology. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

平安擁有32%的所有權,主要由個人投資者組成的公衆對平安醫療科技有一定程度的影響力。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 5.0%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我們的數據表明,私營公司持有公司5.0%的股份。私人公司可能是關聯方。有時,內部人士通過控股私營公司而不是以個人身份對上市公司感興趣。雖然很難得出任何廣泛的中風結論,但值得注意的是,這是一個需要進一步研究的領域。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

It appears to us that public companies own 48% of Ping An Healthcare and Technology. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.

在我們看來,上市公司擁有平安醫療科技48%的股份。這可能是戰略利益,兩家公司可能有相關的商業利益。可能是他們已經消失了。這一裁定可能值得進一步調查。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.

我覺得看看究竟是誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們也需要考慮其他信息。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我喜歡更深入地了解一家公司過去的表現。您可以在這張詳細圖表中找到歷史收入和收入。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,千萬不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論