share_log

Investing in Post Holdings (NYSE:POST) a Year Ago Would Have Delivered You a 19% Gain

Investing in Post Holdings (NYSE:POST) a Year Ago Would Have Delivered You a 19% Gain

一年前投資郵政控股公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:POST)將爲您帶來19%的收益
Simply Wall St ·  03/24 10:55

On average, over time, stock markets tend to rise higher. This makes investing attractive. But not every stock you buy will perform as well as the overall market. Unfortunately for shareholders, while the Post Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:POST) share price is up 19% in the last year, that falls short of the market return. Unfortunately the longer term returns are not so good, with the stock falling 1.7% in the last three years.

平均而言,隨着時間的推移,股市往往會上漲。這使得投資具有吸引力。但是,並非您購買的每隻股票都會像整個市場一樣表現良好。對於股東來說,不幸的是,儘管郵政控股公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:POST)的股價在去年上漲了19%,但仍未達到市場回報率。不幸的是,長期回報並不那麼好,該股在過去三年中下跌了1.7%。

Let's take a look at the underlying fundamentals over the longer term, and see if they've been consistent with shareholders returns.

讓我們來看看長期的基本面,看看它們是否與股東的回報一致。

In his essay The Superinvestors of Graham-and-Doddsville Warren Buffett described how share prices do not always rationally reflect the value of a business. By comparing earnings per share (EPS) and share price changes over time, we can get a feel for how investor attitudes to a company have morphed over time.

在他的文章中 格雷厄姆和多茲維爾的超級投資者 禾倫·巴菲特描述了股價如何並不總是合理地反映企業的價值。通過比較每股收益(EPS)和一段時間內的股價變化,我們可以了解投資者對公司的態度是如何隨着時間的推移而變化的。

During the last year, Post Holdings actually saw its earnings per share drop 66%.

去年,郵政控股的每股收益實際上下降了66%。

Given the share price gain, we doubt the market is measuring progress with EPS. Therefore, it seems likely that investors are putting more weight on metrics other than EPS, at the moment.

鑑於股價上漲,我們懷疑市場是否在衡量每股收益的進展。因此,目前投資者似乎更看重每股收益以外的指標。

However the year on year revenue growth of 22% would help. Many businesses do go through a phase where they have to forgo some profits to drive business development, and sometimes its for the best.

但是,22%的收入同比增長將有所幫助。許多企業確實經歷了一個必須放棄一些利潤來推動業務發展的階段,有時這是最好的選擇。

You can see below how earnings and revenue have changed over time (discover the exact values by clicking on the image).

您可以在下面看到收入和收入如何隨着時間的推移而變化(點擊圖片了解確切的值)。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:POST Earnings and Revenue Growth March 24th 2024
紐約證券交易所:POST 收益和收入增長2024年3月24日

It's probably worth noting we've seen significant insider buying in the last quarter, which we consider a positive. That said, we think earnings and revenue growth trends are even more important factors to consider. So it makes a lot of sense to check out what analysts think Post Holdings will earn in the future (free profit forecasts).

可能值得注意的是,我們在上個季度看到了大量的內幕買盤,我們認爲這是積極的。話雖如此,我們認爲收益和收入增長趨勢是更重要的考慮因素。因此,看看分析師認爲Post Holdings未來的收入(自由利潤預測)是很有意義的。

A Different Perspective

不同的視角

Post Holdings shareholders gained a total return of 19% during the year. But that return falls short of the market. On the bright side, that's still a gain, and it's actually better than the average return of 7% over half a decade It is possible that returns will improve along with the business fundamentals. While it is well worth considering the different impacts that market conditions can have on the share price, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 4 warning signs for Post Holdings (1 shouldn't be ignored) that you should be aware of.

郵政控股股東在年內獲得了19%的總回報。但是這種回報不及市場。好的一面是,這仍然是一個收益,實際上比五年來7%的平均回報率要好。隨着業務基本面的改善,回報可能會有所改善。儘管市場狀況可能對股價產生的不同影響值得考慮,但還有其他因素更爲重要。例如,我們已經確定了您應該注意的4個Post Holdings警告標誌(其中1個不容忽視)。

Post Holdings is not the only stock that insiders are buying. For those who like to find winning investments this free list of growing companies with recent insider purchasing, could be just the ticket.

Post Holdings並不是內部人士唯一買入的股票。對於那些喜歡尋找獲利投資的人來說,這份最近有內幕收購的成長型公司的免費清單可能就是入場券。

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.

請注意,本文引用的市場回報反映了目前在美國交易所交易的股票的市場加權平均回報。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論