share_log

While Institutions Own 33% of Guosen Securities Co., Ltd. (SZSE:002736), Private Companies Are Its Largest Shareholders With 50% Ownership

While Institutions Own 33% of Guosen Securities Co., Ltd. (SZSE:002736), Private Companies Are Its Largest Shareholders With 50% Ownership

雖然機構擁有國信證券股份有限公司(深圳證券交易所:002736)33%的股份,但私營公司是其最大股東,擁有50%的股權
Simply Wall St ·  03/17 23:06

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significant control over Guosen Securities by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • 56% of the business is held by the top 2 shareholders
  • Institutions own 33% of Guosen Securities
  • 私營公司對國信證券的嚴格控制意味着公衆擁有更大的影響管理和治理相關決策的權力
  • 56% 的業務由前兩名股東持有
  • 機構擁有國信證券33%的股份

If you want to know who really controls Guosen Securities Co., Ltd. (SZSE:002736), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are private companies with 50% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道誰真正控制了國信證券股份有限公司(深圳證券交易所:002736),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。而持有最大份額的集團是擁有50%所有權的私營公司。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

Meanwhile, institutions make up 33% of the company's shareholders. Institutions often own shares in more established companies, while it's not unusual to see insiders own a fair bit of smaller companies.

同時,機構佔公司股東的33%。機構通常擁有比較成熟的公司的股份,而內部人士擁有相當一部分小型公司的情況並不少見。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Guosen Securities, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究國信證券的每種所有者。

ownership-breakdown
SZSE:002736 Ownership Breakdown March 18th 2024
SZSE: 002736 所有權明細 2024 年 3 月 18 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Guosen Securities?

關於國信證券,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

Guosen Securities already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Guosen Securities, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

國信證券已經在股份登記處設有機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看國信證券過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SZSE:002736 Earnings and Revenue Growth March 18th 2024
SZSE: 002736 收益和收入增長 2024 年 3 月 18 日

Guosen Securities is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is Shenzhen Investment Holdings Co., Ltd, with ownership of 34%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 22% and 17% of the stock.

國信證券不歸對沖基金所有。公司的最大股東是深圳投資控股有限公司,持股34%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約22%和17%的股份。

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 56% stake.

對股東登記處的更詳細研究表明,兩位最大股東通過其56%的股份擁有公司的大量所有權。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of Guosen Securities

國信證券的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

We note our data does not show any board members holding shares, personally. Given we are not picking up on insider ownership, we may have missing data. Therefore, it would be interesting to assess the CEO compensation and tenure, here.

我們注意到,我們的數據並未顯示任何董事會成員個人持有股份。鑑於我們沒有獲得內部所有權,我們可能缺少數據。因此,在這裏評估首席執行官的薪酬和任期會很有趣。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 14% stake in Guosen Securities. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有國信證券14%的股份。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 50%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我們的數據表明,私人公司持有公司50%的股份。私人公司可能是關聯方。有時,內部人士通過持有私營公司的股權而對上市公司感興趣,而不是以個人身份獲得權益。雖然很難得出任何廣泛的中風結論,但值得注意的是,這是一個有待進一步研究的領域。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Guosen Securities better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Guosen Securities (1 is a bit unpleasant) that you should be aware of.

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,要更好地了解國信證券,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,我們已經確定了國信證券的兩個警告信號(其中一個有點不愉快),你應該注意這些信號。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論