share_log

Those Who Invested in PepsiCo (NASDAQ:PEP) Five Years Ago Are up 62%

Those Who Invested in PepsiCo (NASDAQ:PEP) Five Years Ago Are up 62%

五年前投資百事可樂(納斯達克股票代碼:PEP)的人上漲了62%
Simply Wall St ·  03/08 11:26

If you buy and hold a stock for many years, you'd hope to be making a profit. But more than that, you probably want to see it rise more than the market average. But PepsiCo, Inc. (NASDAQ:PEP) has fallen short of that second goal, with a share price rise of 41% over five years, which is below the market return. The last year has been disappointing, with the stock price down 5.2% in that time.

如果你買入並持有股票多年,你希望獲利。但不僅如此,你可能希望看到它的漲幅超過市場平均水平。但是百事可樂公司(納斯達克股票代碼:PEP)尚未實現第二個目標,股價在五年內上漲了41%,低於市場回報率。去年令人失望,當時股價下跌了5.2%。

With that in mind, it's worth seeing if the company's underlying fundamentals have been the driver of long term performance, or if there are some discrepancies.

考慮到這一點,值得一看公司的基本面是否是長期業績的驅動力,或者是否存在一些差異。

In his essay The Superinvestors of Graham-and-Doddsville Warren Buffett described how share prices do not always rationally reflect the value of a business. One imperfect but simple way to consider how the market perception of a company has shifted is to compare the change in the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price movement.

在他的文章中 格雷厄姆和多茲維爾的超級投資者 禾倫·巴菲特描述了股價如何並不總是合理地反映企業的價值。考慮市場對公司的看法發生了怎樣的變化的一種不完美但簡單的方法是將每股收益(EPS)的變化與股價走勢進行比較。

During five years of share price growth, PepsiCo actually saw its EPS drop 5.7% per year.

在五年的股價增長中,百事可樂的每股收益實際上每年下降5.7%。

This means it's unlikely the market is judging the company based on earnings growth. Because earnings per share don't seem to match up with the share price, we'll take a look at other metrics instead.

這意味着市場不太可能根據收益增長來評判該公司。由於每股收益似乎與股價不符,因此我們將改用其他指標。

In contrast revenue growth of 8.0% per year is probably viewed as evidence that PepsiCo is growing, a real positive. In that case, the company may be sacrificing current earnings per share to drive growth.

相比之下,每年8.0%的收入增長可能被視爲百事可樂增長的證據,這是一個真正的積極因素。在這種情況下,該公司可能會犧牲當前的每股收益來推動增長。

The image below shows how earnings and revenue have tracked over time (if you click on the image you can see greater detail).

下圖顯示了收入和收入隨時間推移的跟蹤情況(如果您點擊圖片,可以看到更多細節)。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:PEP Earnings and Revenue Growth March 8th 2024
納斯達克GS:PEP 收益和收入增長 2024 年 3 月 8 日

PepsiCo is well known by investors, and plenty of clever analysts have tried to predict the future profit levels. So it makes a lot of sense to check out what analysts think PepsiCo will earn in the future (free analyst consensus estimates)

百事可樂爲投資者所熟知,許多聰明的分析師都試圖預測未來的利潤水平。因此,看看分析師認爲百事可樂未來的收入很有意義(免費的分析師共識估計)

What About Dividends?

分紅呢?

As well as measuring the share price return, investors should also consider the total shareholder return (TSR). Whereas the share price return only reflects the change in the share price, the TSR includes the value of dividends (assuming they were reinvested) and the benefit of any discounted capital raising or spin-off. Arguably, the TSR gives a more comprehensive picture of the return generated by a stock. As it happens, PepsiCo's TSR for the last 5 years was 62%, which exceeds the share price return mentioned earlier. This is largely a result of its dividend payments!

除了衡量股價回報率外,投資者還應考慮股東總回報率(TSR)。儘管股價回報率僅反映股價的變化,但股東總回報率包括股息的價值(假設已進行再投資)以及任何折扣融資或分拆的收益。可以說,股東總回報率更全面地描述了股票產生的回報。碰巧的是,百事可樂過去5年的股東總回報率爲62%,超過了前面提到的股價回報率。這在很大程度上是其股息支付的結果!

A Different Perspective

不同的視角

Investors in PepsiCo had a tough year, with a total loss of 2.4% (including dividends), against a market gain of about 34%. Even the share prices of good stocks drop sometimes, but we want to see improvements in the fundamental metrics of a business, before getting too interested. Longer term investors wouldn't be so upset, since they would have made 10%, each year, over five years. It could be that the recent sell-off is an opportunity, so it may be worth checking the fundamental data for signs of a long term growth trend. I find it very interesting to look at share price over the long term as a proxy for business performance. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks, for example - PepsiCo has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

百事可樂的投資者經歷了艱難的一年,總虧損2.4%(包括股息),而市場漲幅約爲34%。即使是優質股票的股價有時也會下跌,但我們希望在過於感興趣之前看到企業基本指標的改善。長期投資者不會那麼沮喪,因爲他們本可以在五年內每年賺10%。最近的拋售可能是一個機會,因此可能值得查看基本面數據以尋找長期增長趨勢的跡象。我發現將長期股價視爲業務績效的代表非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,冒險吧——百事可樂有兩個警告信號,我們認爲你應該注意。

Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of companies we expect will grow earnings.

當然,通過尋找其他地方,你可能會找到一筆不錯的投資。因此,請看一下我們預計收益將增加的這份免費公司名單。

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.

請注意,本文引用的市場回報反映了目前在美國交易所交易的股票的市場加權平均回報。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論