share_log

Great Eagle Holdings Limited's (HKG:41) Last Week's 5.0% Decline Must Have Disappointed Private Companies Who Have a Significant Stake

Great Eagle Holdings Limited's (HKG:41) Last Week's 5.0% Decline Must Have Disappointed Private Companies Who Have a Significant Stake

鷹君控股有限公司(HKG: 41)上週的5.0%跌幅一定讓持有大量股份的私營公司感到失望
Simply Wall St ·  03/05 17:52

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • The considerable ownership by private companies in Great Eagle Holdings indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 64% ownership
  • 29% of Great Eagle Holdings is held by insiders
  • 私營公司在Great Eagle Holdings中擁有大量所有權,這表明它們在管理和業務戰略方面集體擁有更大的發言權
  • 共有2名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲64%
  • 鷹君控股29%的股份由內部人士持有

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Great Eagle Holdings Limited (HKG:41), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are private companies with 42% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要了解誰真正控制了鷹君控股有限公司(HKG:41),了解業務的所有權結構非常重要。而持有最大份額的集團是擁有42%所有權的私營公司。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

Following a 5.0% decrease in the stock price last week, private companies suffered the most losses, but insiders who own 29% stock also took a hit.

繼上週股價下跌5.0%之後,私營公司遭受的損失最大,但擁有29%股票的內部人士也受到打擊。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Great Eagle Holdings.

在下圖中,我們放大了鷹控股的不同所有權群體。

ownership-breakdown
SEHK:41 Ownership Breakdown March 5th 2024
SEHK: 41 所有權明細 2024 年 3 月 5 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Great Eagle Holdings?

關於鷹君控股,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

Great Eagle Holdings already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Great Eagle Holdings' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

鷹君控股公司已經在股票登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到Great Eagle Holdings的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SEHK:41 Earnings and Revenue Growth March 5th 2024
SEHK: 41 2024 年 3 月 5 日收益和收入增長

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Great Eagle Holdings. Lo Family Trust is currently the company's largest shareholder with 42% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 22% and 6.0%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Ka Shui Lo, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.

我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對鷹君控股進行有意義的投資。Lo Family Trust目前是該公司的最大股東,已發行股份的42%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的22%和6.0%。第二大股東Ka Shui Lo也恰好擁有首席執行官的頭銜。

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 64% stake.

對股東登記處的更詳細的研究表明,有兩位大股東通過其64%的股份擁有該公司相當大的所有權。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。我們目前沒有收到分析師對該股的任何報道,因此該公司不太可能被廣泛持有。

Insider Ownership Of Great Eagle Holdings

鷹君控股的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Great Eagle Holdings Limited. It has a market capitalization of just HK$8.2b, and insiders have HK$2.4b worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.

我們最新的數據表明,內部人士擁有鷹君控股有限公司合理比例的股份。它的市值僅爲82億港元,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值24億港元的股票。這非常重要。大多數人會很高興看到董事會與他們一起投資。您不妨訪問這張顯示內部人士近期交易的免費圖表。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 15% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Great Eagle Holdings. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

擁有15%的所有權的公衆(主要由個人投資者組成)對鷹君控股有一定程度的影響力。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 42%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我們可以看到,私營公司擁有已發行股份的42%。可能值得對此進行更深入的研究。如果內部人士等關聯方對其中一傢俬營公司感興趣,則應在年度報告中披露。私營公司也可能在公司中擁有戰略利益。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 4 warning signs for Great Eagle Holdings (of which 1 is potentially serious!) you should know about.

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。比如風險。每家公司都有它們,我們已經發現了鷹君控股的4個警告信號(其中1個可能很嚴重!)你應該知道。

Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.

當然,通過尋找其他地方,你可能會找到一筆不錯的投資。因此,來看看這份有趣的公司的免費清單吧。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論