share_log

HireRight Holdings Corporation (NYSE:HRT) Delivered A Weaker ROE Than Its Industry

HireRight Holdings Corporation (NYSE:HRT) Delivered A Weaker ROE Than Its Industry

HireRight Holdings Corporation(紐約證券交易所代碼:HRT)的投資回報率低於其行業
Simply Wall St ·  02/18 09:10

One of the best investments we can make is in our own knowledge and skill set. With that in mind, this article will work through how we can use Return On Equity (ROE) to better understand a business. We'll use ROE to examine HireRight Holdings Corporation (NYSE:HRT), by way of a worked example.

我們能做的最好的投資之一是我們自己的知識和技能。考慮到這一點,本文將探討如何使用股本回報率(ROE)來更好地了解業務。舉一個行之有效的例子,我們將使用投資回報率來審查HireRight Holdings Corporation(紐約證券交易所代碼:HRT)。

Return on Equity or ROE is a test of how effectively a company is growing its value and managing investors' money. Simply put, it is used to assess the profitability of a company in relation to its equity capital.

股本回報率或投資回報率是對公司增值和管理投資者資金的有效性的考驗。簡而言之,它用於評估公司相對於其股權資本的盈利能力。

How Do You Calculate Return On Equity?

你如何計算股本回報率?

The formula for ROE is:

ROE 的公式是:

Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity

股本回報率 = 淨利潤(來自持續經營業務)÷ 股東權益

So, based on the above formula, the ROE for HireRight Holdings is:

因此,根據上述公式,HireRight Holdings的投資回報率爲:

1.7% = US$8.3m ÷ US$477m (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2023).

1.7% = 830萬美元 ÷ 4.77億美元(基於截至2023年9月的過去十二個月)。

The 'return' is the amount earned after tax over the last twelve months. One way to conceptualize this is that for each $1 of shareholders' capital it has, the company made $0.02 in profit.

“回報” 是過去十二個月的稅後收入。將其概念化的一種方法是,公司每擁有1美元的股東資本,就能獲得0.02美元的利潤。

Does HireRight Holdings Have A Good Return On Equity?

HireRight Holdings的股本回報率是否良好?

By comparing a company's ROE with its industry average, we can get a quick measure of how good it is. The limitation of this approach is that some companies are quite different from others, even within the same industry classification. If you look at the image below, you can see HireRight Holdings has a lower ROE than the average (12%) in the Professional Services industry classification.

通過將公司的投資回報率與其行業平均水平進行比較,我們可以快速衡量其表現如何。這種方法的侷限性在於,有些公司與其他公司有很大不同,即使在相同的行業分類中也是如此。如果你看下圖,你會發現HireRight Holdings的投資回報率低於專業服務行業分類中的平均水平(12%)。

roe
NYSE:HRT Return on Equity February 18th 2024
紐約證券交易所:HRT 股本回報率 2024 年 2 月 18 日

That's not what we like to see. However, a low ROE is not always bad. If the company's debt levels are moderate to low, then there's still a chance that returns can be improved via the use of financial leverage. A high debt company having a low ROE is a different story altogether and a risky investment in our books. To know the 3 risks we have identified for HireRight Holdings visit our risks dashboard for free.

這不是我們喜歡看到的。但是,低投資回報率並不總是壞事。如果公司的債務水平處於中等至低水平,那麼仍然有可能通過使用財務槓桿來提高回報。投資回報率低的高負債公司完全是另一回事,對我們的賬面來說也是一項風險投資。要了解我們爲HireRight Holdings確定的三種風險,請免費訪問我們的風險儀表板。

Why You Should Consider Debt When Looking At ROE

爲什麼在考慮投資回報率時應該考慮債務

Most companies need money -- from somewhere -- to grow their profits. That cash can come from retained earnings, issuing new shares (equity), or debt. In the case of the first and second options, the ROE will reflect this use of cash, for growth. In the latter case, the debt used for growth will improve returns, but won't affect the total equity. Thus the use of debt can improve ROE, albeit along with extra risk in the case of stormy weather, metaphorically speaking.

大多數公司需要來自某個地方的資金來增加利潤。這些現金可能來自留存收益、發行新股(股權)或債務。對於第一和第二種選擇,投資回報率將反映這種對現金增長的使用。在後一種情況下,用於增長的債務將提高回報,但不會影響總資產。因此,使用債務可以提高投資回報率,儘管比喻地說,暴風雨天氣會帶來額外的風險。

HireRight Holdings' Debt And Its 1.7% ROE

HireRight Holdings的債務及其1.7%的投資回報率

HireRight Holdings clearly uses a high amount of debt to boost returns, as it has a debt to equity ratio of 1.54. The combination of a rather low ROE and significant use of debt is not particularly appealing. Debt increases risk and reduces options for the company in the future, so you generally want to see some good returns from using it.

HireRight Holdings顯然使用大量債務來提高回報,因爲其債務與權益比率爲1.54。相當低的投資回報率和大量使用債務相結合並不是特別有吸引力。債務會增加風險,減少公司未來的選擇,因此您通常希望從使用債務中獲得豐厚的回報。

Conclusion

結論

Return on equity is a useful indicator of the ability of a business to generate profits and return them to shareholders. A company that can achieve a high return on equity without debt could be considered a high quality business. If two companies have around the same level of debt to equity, and one has a higher ROE, I'd generally prefer the one with higher ROE.

股本回報率是衡量企業創造利潤並將其返還給股東的能力的有用指標。能夠在沒有債務的情況下實現高股本回報率的公司可以被視爲高質量的企業。如果兩家公司的債務與股權比率大致相同,而一家公司的投資回報率更高,那麼我通常更喜歡投資回報率更高的那家公司。

But when a business is high quality, the market often bids it up to a price that reflects this. Profit growth rates, versus the expectations reflected in the price of the stock, are a particularly important to consider. So I think it may be worth checking this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

但是,當企業質量很高時,市場通常會以反映這一點的價格對其進行出價。與股票價格所反映的預期相比,利潤增長率尤其需要考慮。因此,我認爲可能值得查看這份關於分析師對公司的預測的免費報告。

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, that have HIGH return on equity and low debt.

如果你更願意去另一家公司——一家財務狀況可能優越的公司——那麼千萬不要錯過這份免費的股本回報率高、債務低的有趣公司的名單。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論