share_log

Hunan Lead Power Technology Group Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300530) Last Week's 11% Decline Must Have Disappointed Private Companies Who Have a Significant Stake

Hunan Lead Power Technology Group Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300530) Last Week's 11% Decline Must Have Disappointed Private Companies Who Have a Significant Stake

湖南領電科技集團有限公司's (SZSE: 300530) 上週的11%的跌幅一定讓持有大量股份的私營公司感到失望
Simply Wall St ·  01/25 17:38

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significant control over Hunan Lead Power Technology Group by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 67% ownership
  • Insider ownership in Hunan Lead Power Technology Group is 35%
  • 私營公司對湖南領電科技集團的重大控制意味着公衆擁有更大的影響管理和治理相關決策的權力
  • 共有2名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,持有67%的所有權
  • 湖南領航科技集團的內部所有權爲35%

A look at the shareholders of Hunan Lead Power Technology Group Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300530) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 40% stake, private companies possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看看湖南領電科技集團有限公司(SZSE: 300530)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。私營公司擁有40%的股份,擁有該公司的最大股份。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

While insiders, who own 35% shares weren't spared from last week's CN¥438m market cap drop, private companies as a group suffered the maximum losses

儘管擁有35%股票的內部人士未能倖免於上週4.38億元人民幣的市值下跌,但私營公司作爲一個整體遭受的損失最大

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Hunan Lead Power Technology Group.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於湖南領電科技集團的哪些信息。

View our latest analysis for Hunan Lead Power Technology Group

查看我們對湖南領航科技集團的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
SZSE:300530 Ownership Breakdown January 25th 2024
SZSE: 300530 所有權明細 2024 年 1 月 25 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Hunan Lead Power Technology Group?

關於湖南領電科技集團,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

Institutions have a very small stake in Hunan Lead Power Technology Group. That indicates that the company is on the radar of some funds, but it isn't particularly popular with professional investors at the moment. If the company is growing earnings, that may indicate that it is just beginning to catch the attention of these deep-pocketed investors. When multiple institutional investors want to buy shares, we often see a rising share price. The past revenue trajectory (shown below) can be an indication of future growth, but there are no guarantees.

各機構在湖南領電科技集團中持有很少的股份。這表明該公司受到一些基金的關注,但目前在專業投資者中並不特別受歡迎。如果該公司正在增加收益,那可能表明它才剛剛開始引起這些財力雄厚的投資者的注意。當多個機構投資者想要購買股票時,我們經常會看到股價上漲。過去的收入軌跡(如下所示)可以預示未來的增長,但無法保證。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SZSE:300530 Earnings and Revenue Growth January 25th 2024
SZSE: 300530 收益和收入增長 2024 年 1 月 25 日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Hunan Lead Power Technology Group. Our data shows that Hengyan Hongqi Investment Co., Ltd. is the largest shareholder with 35% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 31% and 4.6%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對湖南領電科技集團進行有意義的投資。我們的數據顯示,衡陽紅旗投資有限公司是最大股東,已發行股份的35%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的31%和4.6%。

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 67% stake.

對股東登記冊的更詳細研究表明,兩名最大股東通過其67%的股份擁有公司的大量所有權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。我們的信息表明,分析師對該股沒有任何報道,因此可能鮮爲人知。

Insider Ownership Of Hunan Lead Power Technology Group

湖南領電科技集團的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

不同國家對內部人員的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Hunan Lead Power Technology Group Co., Ltd.. Insiders have a CN¥1.3b stake in this CN¥3.7b business. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們的最新數據表明,內部人士持有湖南領電科技集團有限公司合理比例的股份。內部人士在這項37億元的業務中持有13億元人民幣的股份。很高興看到內部人士對這項業務進行如此投資。可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士最近是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 21% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Hunan Lead Power Technology Group. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

持有21%的所有權的公衆,主要是個人投資者,對湖南領電科技集團有一定程度的影響力。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 40%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我們的數據表明,私營公司持有公司40%的股份。可能值得對此進行更深入的研究。如果關聯方,例如內部人士,對其中一傢俬營公司有興趣,則應在年度報告中予以披露。私營公司也可能在公司中擁有戰略利益。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for Hunan Lead Power Technology Group (of which 2 are a bit unpleasant!) you should know about.

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。比如風險。每家公司都有它們,我們已經發現了湖南領航科技集團的3個警告標誌(其中2個有點不愉快!)你應該知道。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.

當然,這可能不是最值得買入的股票。因此,您可能希望看到我們免費收集的具有良好財務狀況的有趣潛在客戶。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論