share_log

Dark Horse Technology Group Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300688) Last Week's 13% Decline Must Have Disappointed Individual Investors Who Have a Significant Stake

Dark Horse Technology Group Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300688) Last Week's 13% Decline Must Have Disappointed Individual Investors Who Have a Significant Stake

黑馬科技集團有限公司's (SZSE: 300688) 上週的13%跌幅一定讓持有大量股份的個人投資者感到失望
Simply Wall St ·  01/22 01:48

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Dark Horse Technology Group's significant individual investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • The top 25 shareholders own 41% of the company
  • 25% of Dark Horse Technology Group is held by insiders
  • Dark Horse Technology Group擁有大量個人投資者的所有權,這表明關鍵決策受到廣大公衆股東的影響
  • 前25名股東擁有公司41%的股份
  • 黑馬科技集團25%的股份由內部人士持有

If you want to know who really controls Dark Horse Technology Group Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300688), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that individual investors own the lion's share in the company with 59% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果你想知道誰真正控制着黑馬科技集團有限公司(深圳證券交易所代碼:300688),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。我們可以看到,個人投資者擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲59%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

While insiders who own 25% came under pressure after market cap dropped to CN¥4.3b last week,individual investors took the most losses.

儘管上週市值跌至43億元人民幣後,持有25%的內部人士承受了壓力,但個人投資者蒙受的損失最大。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Dark Horse Technology Group.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們有關黑馬科技集團的哪些信息。

View our latest analysis for Dark Horse Technology Group

查看我們對黑馬科技集團的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
SZSE:300688 Ownership Breakdown January 22nd 2024
SZSE: 300688 所有權明細 2024 年 1 月 22 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Dark Horse Technology Group?

關於黑馬科技集團,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

We can see that Dark Horse Technology Group does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Dark Horse Technology Group's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到,黑馬科技集團確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司很大一部分股票。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看黑馬科技集團的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SZSE:300688 Earnings and Revenue Growth January 22nd 2024
SZSE: 300688 收益和收入增長 2024 年 1 月 22 日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Dark Horse Technology Group. Because actions speak louder than words, we consider it a good sign when insiders own a significant stake in a company. In Dark Horse Technology Group's case, its Top Key Executive, Wen Wen Niu, is the largest shareholder, holding 20% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 6.3% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.8% by the third-largest shareholder.

我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對黑馬科技集團進行有意義的投資。因爲行動勝於雄辯,所以我們認爲當內部人士擁有公司的大量股份時,這是一個好兆頭。就黑馬科技集團而言,其最高主要高管牛文文是最大股東,持有20%的已發行股份。就背景而言,第二大股東持有約6.3%的已發行股份,其次是第三大股東持有4.8%的所有權。

On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.

在研究我們的所有權數據時,我們發現25位大股東共同擁有的股份不到50%,這意味着沒有一個人擁有多數股權。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。據我們所知,沒有分析師對該公司進行報道,因此它可能處於雷達之下。

Insider Ownership Of Dark Horse Technology Group

黑馬科技集團的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Dark Horse Technology Group Co., Ltd.. Insiders own CN¥1.1b worth of shares in the CN¥4.3b company. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們的信息表明,內部人士持有黑馬科技集團有限公司的大量股份。內部人士擁有這家43億元人民幣公司價值11億元人民幣的股份。很高興看到內部人士對這項業務進行如此投資。可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士最近是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, collectively holds 59% of Dark Horse Technology Group shares. This size of ownership gives investors from the general public some collective power. They can and probably do influence decisions on executive compensation, dividend policies and proposed business acquisitions.

公衆主要由個人投資者組成,共持有黑馬科技集團59%的股份。這種所有權規模賦予了公衆投資者一定的集體權力。他們可以而且可能確實會影響有關高管薪酬、股息政策和擬議業務收購的決策。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 11%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我們可以看到,私人公司擁有11%的已發行股份。可能值得對此進行更深入的研究。如果關聯方,例如內部人士,對其中一傢俬營公司有興趣,則應在年度報告中披露。私營公司也可能在公司中擁有戰略利益。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Dark Horse Technology Group better, we need to consider many other factors. Be aware that Dark Horse Technology Group is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those can't be ignored...

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解黑馬科技集團,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。請注意,黑馬科技集團在我們的投資分析中顯示了兩個警告信號,其中一個不容忽視...

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.

當然,這可能不是最值得買入的股票。因此,來看看這份免費的有趣公司名單吧。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論