share_log

After Losing 56% in the Past Year, Lyell Immunopharma, Inc. (NASDAQ:LYEL) Institutional Owners Must Be Relieved by the Recent Gain

Simply Wall St ·  2023/11/18 07:55

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Lyell Immunopharma implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • 53% of the business is held by the top 6 shareholders
  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 機構持有Lyell Immunopharma的大量股權意味着它們對該公司的股價具有重大影響
  • 53% 的業務由前6名股東持有
  • 所有權研究以及分析師預測數據有助於更好地了解股票的機會

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Lyell Immunopharma, Inc. (NASDAQ:LYEL), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 49% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

要了解誰真正控制了Lyell Immunopharma, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:LYEL),了解該業務的所有權結構非常重要。而持有最大份額的集團是擁有49%所有權的機構。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Institutional investors would probably welcome last week's 17% increase in share prices after a year of 56% losses as a sign that returns are likely to begin trending higher.

機構投資者可能會歡迎上週股價在經歷了56%的跌幅之後上漲了17%,這表明回報率可能會開始呈上升趨勢。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Lyell Immunopharma.

在下圖中,我們放大了Lyell Immunopharma的不同所有權組。

Check out our latest analysis for Lyell Immunopharma

查看我們對 Lyell Immunopharma 的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:LYEL Ownership Breakdown November 18th 2023
納斯達克股票代碼:LYEL 所有權明細 2023 年 11 月 18 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Lyell Immunopharma?

關於萊爾 Immunopharma,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據接近當地市場的指數來衡量其表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Lyell Immunopharma. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Lyell Immunopharma's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如你所見,機構投資者持有Lyell Immunopharma的大量股份。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到Lyell Immunopharma的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:LYEL Earnings and Revenue Growth November 18th 2023
NASDAQGS: LYEL 收益和收入增長 2023 年 11 月 18 日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Lyell Immunopharma. Arch Venture Partners, L.P. is currently the largest shareholder, with 14% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 12% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 8.0% by the third-largest shareholder.

對沖基金在Lyell Immunopharma的股票不多。Arch Venture Partners, L.P. 目前是最大股東,已發行股份的14%。就背景而言,第二大股東持有約12%的已發行股份,其次是第三大股東持有8.0%的所有權。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 6 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

經過進一步檢查,我們發現公司一半以上的股份由前六名股東持有,這表明較大股東的利益在一定程度上被較小的股東所平衡。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目標。有很多分析師報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of Lyell Immunopharma

Lyell Immunopharma 的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

儘管內部人員的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

We can see that insiders own shares in Lyell Immunopharma, Inc.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$17m worth of the US$471m company. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們可以看到,內部人士擁有Lyell Immunopharma, Inc.的股份。作爲個人,內部人士共同擁有這家價值4.71億美元的公司的價值1700萬美元。有人會說這表明股東和董事會之間的利益一致。但是,可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否在賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 15% stake in Lyell Immunopharma. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有Lyell Immunopharma15%的股份。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

Private equity firms hold a 20% stake in Lyell Immunopharma. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

私募股權公司持有萊爾免疫製藥公司20%的股份。這表明他們可以在關鍵政策決策中發揮影響力。有時我們會看到私募股權長期存在,但總的來說,它們的投資期限較短,而且顧名思義,對上市公司的投資並不多。一段時間後,他們可能會考慮出售資本並將其重新部署到其他地方。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

Public companies currently own 12% of Lyell Immunopharma stock. We can't be certain but it is quite possible this is a strategic stake. The businesses may be similar, or work together.

上市公司目前擁有Lyell Immunopharma12%的股票。我們無法確定,但這很可能是戰略利益。這些企業可能相似,也可能合作。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should learn about the 3 warning signs we've spotted with Lyell Immunopharma (including 2 which make us uncomfortable) .

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。爲此,你應該了解我們在Lyell Immunopharma中發現的3個警告信號(包括兩個讓我們感到不舒服的信號)。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

歸根結底,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問這份關於公司分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論