Some of this week's deals and a brief discussion on the trading normal 👇
$Alphabet-C(GOOG.US$ Using traditional investor buying methods, the price moves upward through the 30MA, which is still rising, in the weekly chart. I'm not expecting a big deal here; it's just a temporary stop for cash, which can be taken out at any time.
$GigaCloud Technology(GCT.US$ Shortly after the stop-loss in the previous transaction came out, this time the financial report was targeted, and potentially huge fluctuations were anticipated in advance. The small profit was cut by about 1/4 within the previous hour, making it less difficult to manage risk. The trading volume after closing showed sufficient strength, and we will keep an eye on it next week.
$Macy's(M.US$ The teacup pattern, which is about 3 months old, has not seen significant strength yet. I don't know if it works. It continues to be handled as usual: if it stays above the stop-loss line, it continues to be held; if it falls below the stop-loss line, it is sold for a claim.
$Rocket(RKT.US$ I bought a fake platform to break through. Currently, the price is on the verge of a stop loss. When the closing price falls below the red line, it is time to sell at a loss.
$Squarespace(SQSP.US$ After the previous major cycle consolidation failed, another attempt was made this week; in the pullback buying after reaching a new high, the gap below has already been tested twice, and the gap stop loss (about 1 dollar) was used to see if this works.
Profit and loss and position ratio of this week's trade name: Apart from GCT having a little profit, there is almost no profit or even loss; most use positions in the 3%-4% range, while SQSP uses positions in the 1.5%-2.5% range 👇
The above is a microcosm of most traders' trading norms (I didn't post it before doesn't mean they don't exist because the base is very large);
Not every transaction can have excessive returns like SMCI, NVDA, and CELH;
The real situation is:Most trades accept small losses。
More than half of the actual transactions are “in the process of claiming a stop-loss” or “preparing to claim a stop-loss.”
Transparent traders don't pay too much attention to accuracy, nor are they afraid to make mistakes; even if they make mistakes, they will immediately kill the mistakes that have just started in their cradle, learn from them, and become stronger (mentality and experience) 🙂
Here are two more images that have always been in the minds of mature traders 👇
Disclaimer: Community is offered by Moomoo Technologies Inc. and is for educational purposes only.
Read more
Comment
Sign in to post a comment
151083369 : refuelling
sTone83OP 151083369: I just want to explain how real transactions are. The reality is that a large number of wrong transactions will not affect your long-term real profitability;
Avoid unsuspecting people from misunderstanding the stock market
151083369 sTone83OP: I agree completely. There are no shortcuts to success; it is a process of slow accumulation. Being a friend of time grows with God
icezzz : What do u think aboutPANW ? In my watchlist quite some time, plan to buy in some
sTone83OP icezzz: On the weekly chart, it does meet investors' buying requirements. 260 can be used as an exit point. Since it potentially takes a lot of time to work, it's not recommended to invest too much money
Inhumane : happy new year
MattSully : Thanks for sharing bro
. Hope and pray we all have good trading outcomes this year!
MattSully : You still in META? What do you think of the chart? I’m still trying to figure out the difference between a normal pullback and distribution…how do you tell the difference?
sTone83OP MattSully: Yes, and this profitability will last a lifetime
sTone83OP MattSully: Meta hasn't done anything wrong so far, so there's no need to speculate at all; after all, the second small gap still works.
View more comments...