share_log

Is Shangri-La Asia (HKG:69) A Risky Investment?

香格里拉亜洲(HKG:69)はリスクのある投資ですか?

Simply Wall St ·  04/11 20:02

Howard Marks put it nicely when he said that, rather than worrying about share price volatility, 'The possibility of permanent loss is the risk I worry about... and every practical investor I know worries about.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. Importantly, Shangri-La Asia Limited (HKG:69) does carry debt. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?

When Is Debt Dangerous?

Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.

What Is Shangri-La Asia's Debt?

The chart below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that Shangri-La Asia had US$5.69b in debt in December 2023; about the same as the year before. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$978.3m, its net debt is less, at about US$4.71b.

debt-equity-history-analysis
SEHK:69 Debt to Equity History April 12th 2024

How Strong Is Shangri-La Asia's Balance Sheet?

The latest balance sheet data shows that Shangri-La Asia had liabilities of US$1.47b due within a year, and liabilities of US$5.93b falling due after that. Offsetting this, it had US$978.3m in cash and US$272.7m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling US$6.14b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

This deficit casts a shadow over the US$2.59b company, like a colossus towering over mere mortals. So we'd watch its balance sheet closely, without a doubt. After all, Shangri-La Asia would likely require a major re-capitalisation if it had to pay its creditors today.

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

Shangri-La Asia shareholders face the double whammy of a high net debt to EBITDA ratio (10.9), and fairly weak interest coverage, since EBIT is just 0.83 times the interest expense. The debt burden here is substantial. One redeeming factor for Shangri-La Asia is that it turned last year's EBIT loss into a gain of US$208m, over the last twelve months. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Shangri-La Asia can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So it is important to check how much of its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) converts to actual free cash flow. Considering the last year, Shangri-La Asia actually recorded a cash outflow, overall. Debt is usually more expensive, and almost always more risky in the hands of a company with negative free cash flow. Shareholders ought to hope for an improvement.

Our View

On the face of it, Shangri-La Asia's interest cover left us tentative about the stock, and its level of total liabilities was no more enticing than the one empty restaurant on the busiest night of the year. But at least its EBIT growth rate is not so bad. After considering the datapoints discussed, we think Shangri-La Asia has too much debt. That sort of riskiness is ok for some, but it certainly doesn't float our boat. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for Shangri-La Asia you should be aware of.

If, after all that, you're more interested in a fast growing company with a rock-solid balance sheet, then check out our list of net cash growth stocks without delay.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

これらの内容は、情報提供及び投資家教育のためのものであり、いかなる個別株や投資方法を推奨するものではありません。 更に詳しい情報
    コメントする