share_log

Garrett Motion's (NASDAQ:GTX) Conservative Accounting Might Explain Soft Earnings

Garrett Motion's (NASDAQ:GTX) Conservative Accounting Might Explain Soft Earnings

Garrett Motion(纳斯达克股票代码:GTX)的保守会计可能会解释软收益
Simply Wall St ·  05/08 07:56

A lackluster earnings announcement from Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ:GTX) last week didn't sink the stock price. We think that investors are worried about some weaknesses underlying the earnings.

加勒特汽车公司(纳斯达克股票代码:GTX)上周公布的财报乏善可陈,但这并没有使股价下跌。我们认为,投资者担心收益背后的一些弱点。

earnings-and-revenue-history
NasdaqGS:GTX Earnings and Revenue History May 8th 2024
NasdaqGS: GTX 收益和收入历史记录 2024 年 5 月 8 日

A Closer Look At Garrett Motion's Earnings

仔细看看Garrett Motion的收益

As finance nerds would already know, the accrual ratio from cashflow is a key measure for assessing how well a company's free cash flow (FCF) matches its profit. To get the accrual ratio we first subtract FCF from profit for a period, and then divide that number by the average operating assets for the period. You could think of the accrual ratio from cashflow as the 'non-FCF profit ratio'.

正如财务爱好者已经知道的那样,现金流的应计比率是评估公司自由现金流(FCF)与其利润相匹配程度的关键指标。为了获得应计比率,我们首先从一段时间内的利润中减去FCF,然后将该数字除以该期间的平均运营资产。你可以将现金流的应计比率视为 “非FCF利润率”。

As a result, a negative accrual ratio is a positive for the company, and a positive accrual ratio is a negative. While it's not a problem to have a positive accrual ratio, indicating a certain level of non-cash profits, a high accrual ratio is arguably a bad thing, because it indicates paper profits are not matched by cash flow. To quote a 2014 paper by Lewellen and Resutek, "firms with higher accruals tend to be less profitable in the future".

因此,负应计比率对公司来说是正数,而正应计比率是负数。虽然正应计比率表明非现金利润达到一定水平不是问题,但高应计比率可以说是一件坏事,因为它表明纸面利润与现金流不匹配。引用Lewellen和Resutek在2014年发表的一篇论文,“应计额较高的公司将来的利润往往会降低”。

For the year to March 2024, Garrett Motion had an accrual ratio of -0.46. That implies it has very good cash conversion, and that its earnings in the last year actually significantly understate its free cash flow. Indeed, in the last twelve months it reported free cash flow of US$350m, well over the US$6.00m it reported in profit. Garrett Motion's free cash flow improved over the last year, which is generally good to see. Notably, the company has issued new shares, thus diluting existing shareholders and reducing their share of future earnings.

在截至2024年3月的一年中,Garrett Motion的应计比率为-0.46。这意味着它的现金转化率非常好,而且其去年的收益实际上大大低估了其自由现金流。事实上,在过去的十二个月中,它报告的自由现金流为3.5亿美元,远远超过其公布的600万美元利润。Garrett Motion的自由现金流比去年有所改善,总体而言,这是值得期待的。值得注意的是,该公司发行了新股,从而稀释了现有股东并减少了他们在未来收益中所占的份额。

That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates.

这可能会让你想知道分析师对未来盈利能力的预测。幸运的是,您可以单击此处查看根据他们的估计描绘未来盈利能力的交互式图表。

In order to understand the potential for per share returns, it is essential to consider how much a company is diluting shareholders. As it happens, Garrett Motion issued 248% more new shares over the last year. That means its earnings are split among a greater number of shares. To talk about net income, without noticing earnings per share, is to be distracted by the big numbers while ignoring the smaller numbers that talk to per share value. Check out Garrett Motion's historical EPS growth by clicking on this link.

为了了解每股回报的可能性,必须考虑公司在多大程度上稀释了股东。碰巧的是,Garrett Motion发行的新股比去年增加了248%。这意味着其收益将分配给更多的股票。在不注意每股收益的情况下谈论净收益,就是被大数字分散注意力,而忽略与之交谈的较小数字 每股 价值。点击此链接,查看Garrett Motion的历史每股收益增长。

A Look At The Impact Of Garrett Motion's Dilution On Its Earnings Per Share (EPS)

看看Garrett Motion的稀释对其每股收益(EPS)的影响

Unfortunately, Garrett Motion's profit is down 86% per year over three years. And even focusing only on the last twelve months, we see profit is down 88%. Like a sack of potatoes thrown from a delivery truck, EPS fell harder, down 96% in the same period. And so, you can see quite clearly that dilution is having a rather significant impact on shareholders.

不幸的是,Garrett Motion的利润在三年内每年下降86%。而且,即使只关注过去的十二个月,我们也看到利润下降了88%。就像从送货卡车上扔出一袋土豆一样,每股收益的下降幅度更大,同期下降了96%。因此,你可以清楚地看到,稀释对股东产生了相当大的影响。

In the long term, if Garrett Motion's earnings per share can increase, then the share price should too. But on the other hand, we'd be far less excited to learn profit (but not EPS) was improving. For that reason, you could say that EPS is more important that net income in the long run, assuming the goal is to assess whether a company's share price might grow.

从长远来看,如果Garrett Motion的收益 每股 可以上涨,那么股价也应该上涨。但另一方面,得知利润(但不是每股收益)正在改善,我们就不那么兴奋了。出于这个原因,假设目标是评估公司的股价是否可能上涨,你可以说从长远来看,每股收益比净收入更为重要。

Our Take On Garrett Motion's Profit Performance

我们对Garrett Motion盈利表现的看法

In conclusion, Garrett Motion has a strong cashflow relative to earnings, which indicates good quality earnings, but the dilution means its earnings per share are dropping faster than its profit. Given the contrasting considerations, we don't have a strong view as to whether Garrett Motion's profits are an apt reflection of its underlying potential for profit. In light of this, if you'd like to do more analysis on the company, it's vital to be informed of the risks involved. To that end, you should learn about the 4 warning signs we've spotted with Garrett Motion (including 2 which shouldn't be ignored).

总之,相对于收益而言,Garrett Motion的现金流强劲,这表明收益质量良好,但稀释意味着其每股收益的下降速度快于利润的下降速度。鉴于截然不同的考虑,我们对Garrett Motion的利润是否恰当地反映了其潜在的盈利潜力没有强烈的看法。有鉴于此,如果你想对公司进行更多分析,了解所涉及的风险至关重要。为此,你应该了解我们在Garrett Motion中发现的4个警告信号(包括2个不容忽视的警告)。

Our examination of Garrett Motion has focussed on certain factors that can make its earnings look better than they are. But there is always more to discover if you are capable of focussing your mind on minutiae. Some people consider a high return on equity to be a good sign of a quality business. While it might take a little research on your behalf, you may find this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks that insiders are buying to be useful.

我们对Garrett Motion的审查侧重于某些可能使其收益看起来好于实际的因素。但是,如果你能够将注意力集中在细节上,总会有更多的事情需要发现。有些人认为高股本回报率是优质业务的好兆头。虽然可能需要你进行一些研究,但你可能会发现这份免费收集的拥有高股本回报率的公司,或者这份内部人士正在购买的股票清单很有用。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发