share_log

Barron's: Which company can reach $1 trillion after Facebook? Here's our opinion.

Barron's: Which company can reach $1 trillion after Facebook? Here's our opinion.

Barron‘s:继Facebook之后,哪家公司的市值能达到1万亿美元?以下是我们的看法。
Dow Jones Newswires ·  2021/07/10 03:19

By Alex Eule

亚历克斯·尤尔著

Late last month, Facebook notched what could be its most notable achievement yet: Its market value hit $1 trillion. Just five U.S.-listed companies have reached the $1 trillion mark -- or 0.08% of the total number of stocks currently traded on the New York Stock Exchange and Nasdaq. That's roughly the odds of a high school basketball player making the National Basketball Association. It's an elite club.

上月底,Facebook取得了可能是其迄今最引人注目的成就:其市值达到了1万亿美元。市值突破1万亿美元大关的美国上市公司只有五家,占纽约证交所和纳斯达克目前交易股票总数的0.08%。这大致相当于一名高中篮球运动员进入美国国家篮球协会的几率。这是一家精英俱乐部。

Now that $Facebook Inc(FB.US)$ has earned access -- its market cap was down slightly by the end of the week, to $980 billion -- we might be waiting a while for the next entrant. That's partly because the federal government wants to rein in big business, but also because the current trillion-dollar members have a natural incentive to keep the club small.

现在$Facebook(FB.US)$到本周末,它的市值略有下降,降至9800亿美元,我们可能还需要等待一段时间才能看到下一位竞争者。这在一定程度上是因为联邦政府想要控制大企业,但也是因为目前数万亿美元的成员有一种天然的动机来保持俱乐部的规模。

There's a big drop-off to the next candidate for membership -- call it the Trillion-Dollar Cliff. Among U.S.-listed companies, $Tesla, Inc.(TSLA.US)$ is next up, with a market value of $629 billion, followed by $Berkshire Hathaway Inc.-Class A(BRK.A.US)$, $Alibaba Group Holding Ltd(BABA.US)$, $Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd(TSM.US)$ and $Visa Inc(V.US)$.

下一个成员资格候选人的支持率大幅下降--称之为万亿美元悬崖。在美国上市公司中,$Tesla,Inc.(TSLA.US)$紧随其后,市值为6290亿美元,紧随其后的是$Berkshire Hathaway Inc.-A类(BRK.A.US)$, $阿里巴巴(BABA.US)$, $台积电(TSM.US)$$Visa(V.US)$.

We've covered all of those stocks closely at Barron's, and I've spent the past few weeks talking to colleagues about which company might be next. I've also queried sources and polled readers of our daily Review & Preview newsletter.

我们已经在Barron‘s密切关注了所有这些股票,过去几周我一直在与同事们讨论下一家可能是哪家公司。我还询问了我们每日评论与预览时事通讯的来源和读者。

A few names get repeated mentions: Tesla, $NVIDIA Corp(NVDA.US)$, Visa, and $JPMorgan Chase & Co(JPM.US)$, each of which are worth at least $400 billion. Shopify (SHOP) got a less obvious mention. The company is way down the market-value rank at $182 billion. It has become something of the anti- Amazon, providing bricks-and-mortar vendors and other businesses with easy e-commerce tools. While Amazon.com seeks to fend off regulation and a potential breakup, Shopify can keep its head down and continue to recruit new business.

有几个名字被反复提及:特斯拉,$英伟达(美国内华达州)$、Visa和$摩根大通(摩根大通美国)$,每一家都至少价值4000亿美元。Shopify(商店)得到了一个不那么明显的提及。该公司市值仅为1,820亿美元,远远低于这一水平。它已经成为了某种程度上的反亚马逊者,为实体供应商和其他企业提供了简单的电子商务工具。虽然亚马逊寻求抵御监管和潜在的拆分,但Shopify可以保持低调,继续招募新业务。

I'll place my bets on Visa getting to $1 trillion next, even if it takes a while. The company is closely tied to the economic recovery, since it gets a cut of transactions that run through its global electronic-payments network.

我把赌注押在Visa接下来会达到1万亿美元,即使这需要一段时间。该公司与经济复苏密切相关,因为它从通过其全球电子支付网络进行的交易中分得一杯羹。

The business, which is part tech and part financial services, has a long tailwind as cash usage declines around the world. Visa shares have returned an annualized 28% over the past decade. If that pattern holds, Visa would reach $1 trillion by 2024.

这项业务部分是科技,部分是金融服务,随着世界各地现金使用量的下降,这项业务有很长的顺风。过去十年,Visa股票的年化回报率为28%。如果这种模式保持不变,到2024年,Visa的收入将达到1万亿美元。

While the next trillion-dollar stock is clearly a guessing game, one thing is clear: Large numbers have been no impediment to future gains. Apple has returned an annualized 44% since it became the first U.S.-listed company to reach a $1 trillion value in August 2018. The stock closed at a record this past week, giving it a market value of $2.4 trillion.

虽然下一个万亿美元的股票显然是一场猜谜游戏,但有一件事是明确的:大量的股票并不会阻碍未来的收益。自2018年8月成为首家市值达到1万亿美元的美国上市公司以来,苹果的年化回报率为44%。过去一周,该股收盘创下历史新高,市值达到2.4万亿美元。

I asked Denise Chisholm, Fidelity's sector strategist, if the so-called law of large numbers would ever kick in. "Size is not particularly predictive one way or the other," she says. "The S&P information technology, as a percent of overall S&P, is now in excess of 20%. Does that have any meaning on whether or not that group or that sector can outperform in the future? The answer really is no."

我问富达的行业策略师丹尼斯·奇泽姆(Denise Chisholm),所谓的大数定律是否会生效。她说:“无论从哪方面来说,规模都不能很好地预测。”“标普信息技术指数目前占整体标普指数的比例超过20%。这对该集团或该行业未来能否跑赢大盘有任何意义吗?答案真的是否定的。”

Right now, the trillion-dollar members have momentum on their side. "A ball in motion tends to stay in motion," she says.

现在,万亿美元的成员有势头站在他们这边。“运动中的球往往会保持运动状态,”她说。

Tech's secret sauce has been continuously expanding profit margins, with valuations that are essentially in line with their historic norms. Operating margins for the S&P 500's information technology sector have doubled in the past 15 years, to a recent 21%, according to Yardeni Research, while overall S&P 500 margins have been static at 10% or so (excluding a collapse during the financial crisis).

科技公司的秘诀一直是不断扩大利润率,估值基本上符合它们的历史正常水平。根据Yardeni Research的数据,过去15年,标准普尔500指数信息技术板块的营业利润率翻了一番,最近达到21%,而整体标准普尔500指数的利润率一直稳定在10%左右(不包括金融危机期间的崩盘)。

Tech's magic -- and those trillion-dollar club passes -- are now hitting up against the increased likelihood of regulation. "The sheer fact of the headline of the trillion-dollar club is going to bring even more regulation," says Jim Paulsen, chief investment officer of The Leuthold Group.

科技的魔力--以及那些价值数万亿美元的俱乐部通行证--现在正面临着监管可能性的增加。Leuthold Group首席投资官吉姆·保尔森(Jim Paulsen)表示:“这个万亿美元俱乐部的头条新闻将带来更多监管。”

On Friday, the Biden administration signed an executive order that calls for a "whole-of-government effort to promote competition in the American economy." The order, which consists of 72 initiatives, is simultaneously broad and narrow. It pushes against consolidation while also addressing consumer pain points, like early-termination fees for broadband services, hard-to-fix consumer devices, and airline baggage fees.

周五,拜登政府签署了一项行政命令,呼吁“全政府努力促进美国经济中的竞争”。这个由72项倡议组成的秩序既宽泛又狭隘。它反对整合,同时也解决了消费者的痛点,如宽带服务的提前终止费、难以修复的消费设备和航空公司的行李费。

By now, the Biden administration recognizes that tech regulation isn't a slam dunk with the public. Despite unease around data and privacy practices, less than half of U.S. adults are in favor of more tech regulation, according to a 2020 Pew Research poll.

到目前为止,拜登政府认识到,科技监管并不是公众的一记重击。皮尤研究中心(Pew Research)2020年的一项民意调查显示,尽管人们对数据和隐私做法感到不安,但只有不到一半的美国成年人支持更多的科技监管。

Privacy regulation is politically complicated, especially if it means reining in the advertising that enables free services like social media, internet search, and email. But there isn't much controversial about limiting broadband charges or making it easier to fix a smartphone battery. The White House seems to be attacking companies where it hurts -- their mixed record of customer service.

隐私监管在政治上是复杂的,特别是如果它意味着控制广告,这些广告可以提供社交媒体、互联网搜索和电子邮件等免费服务。但限制宽带收费或让智能手机电池更容易修复并没有太多争议。白宫似乎正在攻击公司的痛处--它们的客户服务记录参差不齐。

For now, investors continue to generally overlook regulation. All five members of the trillion-dollar club were either higher or flat on Friday in the wake of Biden's executive order.

就目前而言,投资者仍然普遍忽视监管。在拜登的行政命令发布后,这个万亿美元俱乐部的五名成员在周五要么上涨,要么持平。

It's time to take regulation more seriously, says Ed Yardeni, president of Yardeni Research. "A trillion here, a trillion there attracts a lot of attention from politicians."

Yardeni Research总裁埃德·亚德尼表示,是时候更认真地对待监管了。“这里一万亿,那里一万亿,引起了政界人士的极大关注。”

Write to Alex Eule at alex.eule@barrons.com

写信给Alex Eule,电子邮件:alex.eule@Barrons.com

(END) Dow Jones Newswires

(完)道琼通讯社

July 09, 2021 20:06 ET (00:06 GMT)

2021年07月09日20:06东部时间(格林尼治标准时间00:06)

Copyright (c) 2021 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

版权所有(C)2021道琼斯公司。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发