share_log

Do Institutions Own Suoxinda Holdings Limited (HKG:3680) Shares?

Do Institutions Own Suoxinda Holdings Limited (HKG:3680) Shares?

机构是否拥有索新达控股有限公司(HKG:3680)的股份?
Simply Wall St ·  2022/04/28 18:33

The big shareholder groups in Suoxinda Holdings Limited (HKG:3680) have power over the company. Insiders often own a large chunk of younger, smaller, companies while huge companies tend to have institutions as shareholders. I quite like to see at least a little bit of insider ownership. As Charlie Munger said 'Show me the incentive and I will show you the outcome.

索新达控股有限公司(HKG:3680)的大股东集团拥有对该公司的控制权。内部人士通常持有大量较年轻、规模较小的公司,而大公司往往有机构作为股东。我非常希望看到至少有一点内部人持股。正如查理·芒格所说,给我看激励措施,我就会告诉你结果。

Suoxinda Holdings is a smaller company with a market capitalization of HK$803m, so it may still be flying under the radar of many institutional investors. Our analysis of the ownership of the company, below, shows that institutional investors have not yet purchased shares. Let's delve deeper into each type of owner, to discover more about Suoxinda Holdings.

索新达控股是一家规模较小的公司,市值为8.03亿港元,因此它可能仍在许多机构投资者的雷达下飞行。我们对公司所有权的分析显示,机构投资者尚未购买股票。让我们更深入地研究每种类型的所有者,以了解更多关于索新达控股的信息。

View our latest analysis for Suoxinda Holdings

查看我们对索辛达控股的最新分析

SEHK:3680 Ownership Breakdown April 28th 2022
联交所:3680所有权分类2022年4月28日

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Suoxinda Holdings?

机构持股的缺失告诉了我们索辛达控股的什么信息?

Small companies that are not very actively traded often lack institutional investors, but it's less common to see large companies without them.

交易不太活跃的小公司往往缺乏机构投资者,但大公司没有机构投资者的情况较少。

There could be various reasons why no institutions own shares in a company. Typically, small, newly listed companies don't attract much attention from fund managers, because it would not be possible for large fund managers to build a meaningful position in the company. Alternatively, there might be something about the company that has kept institutional investors away. Suoxinda Holdings' earnings and revenue track record (below) may not be compelling to institutional investors -- or they simply might not have looked at the business closely.

为什么没有机构持有一家公司的股票,可能有各种原因。通常情况下,新上市的小型公司不会引起基金经理太多关注,因为大型基金管理公司不可能在该公司建立有意义的头寸。或者,该公司可能有某些方面让机构投资者望而却步。索辛达控股的盈利和收入记录(见下文)对机构投资者来说可能并不令人信服--或者他们可能只是没有密切关注这项业务。

SEHK:3680 Earnings and Revenue Growth April 28th 2022
联交所:3680盈利及收入增长2022年4月28日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Suoxinda Holdings. Our data shows that Hongtao Song is the largest shareholder with 21% of shares outstanding. Liping Xia is the second largest shareholder owning 16% of common stock, and Zhenping Chen holds about 16% of the company stock. Furthermore, CEO Fu-Shea Wu is the owner of 1.5% of the company's shares.

我们注意到,对冲基金没有对索辛达控股进行有意义的投资。我们的数据显示,宋宏涛是第一大股东,持有21%的流通股。夏立平为第二大股东,持有16%的普通股,陈振平持有约16%的公司股份。此外,首席执行官吴福寿持有该公司1.5%的股份。

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 3 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 52% stake.

对股东登记的更详细的研究表明,三大股东通过他们52%的股份在公司中拥有相当大的所有权。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.

虽然研究一家公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向也是有意义的。目前,我们没有注意到分析师对该股的报道,因此该公司不太可能被广泛持有。

Insider Ownership Of Suoxinda Holdings

索新达控股的内部人所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

尽管对内部人的准确定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人。公司管理层对董事会负责,董事会应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时最高层管理人员本身也是董事会成员。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部人持股是积极的,因为它可以表明董事会与其他股东很好地结盟。然而,在某些情况下,太多的权力集中在这个群体中。

It seems that insiders own more than half the Suoxinda Holdings Limited stock. This gives them a lot of power. Given it has a market cap of HK$803m, that means they have HK$491m worth of shares. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish todiscover (for free) if they have been buying or selling.

看来,内部人士持有索新达控股有限公司一半以上的股份。这给了他们很大的权力。鉴于该公司市值为8.03亿港元,这意味着他们拥有价值4.91亿港元的股票。大多数人会高兴地看到董事会与他们一起投资。你可能希望(免费)发现他们是否一直在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 33% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Suoxinda Holdings. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

持有33%股权的普通公众,主要由个人投资者组成,对索新达控股有一定程度的影响力。这种规模的所有权虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私营公司所有权

It seems that Private Companies own 5.8%, of the Suoxinda Holdings stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

看起来,私营公司持有索新达控股5.8%的股份。私营公司可能是关联方。有时,内部人士通过持有一家私人公司来对上市公司感兴趣,而不是以个人身份。虽然很难得出任何大致的中风结论,但值得注意的是,这是一个值得进一步研究的领域。

Next Steps:

接下来的步骤:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Suoxinda Holdings you should be aware of, and 1 of them is concerning.

虽然考虑拥有一家公司的不同集团是很值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。举个例子:我们发现了两个索辛达控股的警示信号,其中一个是令人担忧的。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.

当然了这可能不是最值得购买的股票。。因此,你可能希望看到我们的有趣的前景吹嘘有利的财务免费收集。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数字是使用过去12个月的数据计算的,指的是截至财务报表日期的最后一个月的12个月期间。这可能与全年的年度报告数字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有什么反馈吗?担心内容吗?保持联系直接与我们联系。或者,也可以给编辑组发电子邮件,地址是implywallst.com。
这篇由《华尔街日报》撰写的文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并不打算作为财务建议。它不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也没有考虑你的目标或你的财务状况。我们的目标是为您带来由基本面数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会将最新的对价格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考虑在内。简单地说,华尔街在提到的任何股票中都没有头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发