share_log

First Foundation Inc.'s (NYSE:FFWM) High Institutional Ownership Speaks for Itself as Stock Continues to Impress, up 20% Over Last Week

First Foundation Inc.'s (NYSE:FFWM) High Institutional Ownership Speaks for Itself as Stock Continues to Impress, up 20% Over Last Week

第一基金会公司。”s(纽约证券交易所代码:FFWM)高机构所有权不言自明,股票继续给人留下深刻印象,比上周上涨20%
Simply Wall St ·  05/21 12:08

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies First Foundation's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 12 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 机构所有权居高不下意味着First Foundation的股价对其交易行为很敏感
  • 共有12名投资者持有该公司的多数股权,所有权为52%
  • 业内人士最近卖出了

Every investor in First Foundation Inc. (NYSE:FFWM) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 71% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

第一基金会公司(纽约证券交易所代码:FFWM)的每位投资者都应该知道最强大的股东群体。持有该公司股份最多的集团是机构,准确地说约为71%。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果股价下跌,则损失最大)。

And as as result, institutional investors reaped the most rewards after the company's stock price gained 20% last week. One-year return to shareholders is currently 44% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.

结果,在上周公司股价上涨20%之后,机构投资者获得了最大的回报。目前,一年期股东回报率为44%,上周的涨幅锦上添花。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of First Foundation.

在下图中,我们放大了第一基金会的不同所有权组。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:FFWM Ownership Breakdown May 21st 2024
纽约证券交易所:FFWM 所有权明细 2024 年 5 月 21 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About First Foundation?

关于第一基金会,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构在向自己的投资者报告时通常会根据基准来衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会对股票更加热情。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在册,尤其是在它们正在成长的情况下。

We can see that First Foundation does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see First Foundation's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我们可以看到,第一基金会确实有机构投资者;他们持有公司很大一部分股票。这表明专业投资者有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会像所有人一样进行不良投资。当多家机构拥有一只股票时,总是存在处于 “拥挤交易” 的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。对于没有增长历史的公司,这种风险更高。你可以在下面看到First Foundation的历史收益和收入,但请记住,故事总是有更多内容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:FFWM Earnings and Revenue Growth May 21st 2024
纽约证券交易所:FFWM 收益和收入增长 2024 年 5 月 21 日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. It looks like hedge funds own 6.2% of First Foundation shares. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. FMR LLC is currently the company's largest shareholder with 9.0% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 7.1% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.2% by the third-largest shareholder. Additionally, the company's CEO Scott Kavanaugh directly holds 2.5% of the total shares outstanding.

由于机构投资者拥有已发行股票的一半以上,董事会可能必须注意他们的偏好。看来对冲基金拥有第一基金会6.2%的股份。这值得注意,因为对冲基金通常是非常活跃的投资者,他们可能会试图影响管理层。许多人希望在短期或中期内看到价值创造(以及更高的股价)。FMR LLC目前是该公司的最大股东,已发行股份为9.0%。就背景而言,第二大股东持有约7.1%的已发行股份,其次是第三大股东持有6.2%的所有权。此外,该公司首席执行官斯科特·卡瓦诺直接持有已发行股份总额的2.5%。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 12 shareholders have a combined ownership of 52% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

仔细观察我们的所有权数据就会发现,前12名股东的总所有权为52%,这意味着没有一个股东拥有多数股东。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议以更深入地了解股票的预期表现也是一种好做法。有不少分析师报道了该股,因此你可以很容易地研究预测的增长。

Insider Ownership Of First Foundation

第一基金会的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理层对董事会负责,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也是董事会成员。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为这可能表明董事会与其他股东关系良好。但是,在某些情况下,过多的权力集中在该群体中。

We can see that insiders own shares in First Foundation Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$354m, and insiders have US$31m worth of shares, in their own names. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我们可以看到内部人士拥有第一基金会公司的股份。它的市值仅为3.54亿美元,内部人士以自己的名义持有价值3100万美元的股票。有人会说,这表明股东和董事会之间的利益一致。但是可能值得检查一下这些内部人士是否一直在出售。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 14% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over First Foundation. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

First Foundation拥有14%的所有权,主要由个人投资者组成的公众对第一基金会有一定程度的影响力。尽管这个群体不一定能做主,但它肯定会对公司的运作方式产生真正的影响。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand First Foundation better, we need to consider many other factors. Be aware that First Foundation is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...

拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得考虑的。但是,为了更好地了解第一基金会,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。请注意,First Foundation在我们的投资分析中显示了1个警告信号,您应该知道...

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但归根结底,决定这家企业所有者的表现的是未来,而不是过去。因此,我们认为最好看一下这份免费报告,该报告显示了分析师是否预测了更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发