share_log

Raymond James Financial, Inc. (NYSE:RJF) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 76% of the Company

Raymond James Financial, Inc. (NYSE:RJF) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 76% of the Company

Raymond James Financial, Inc.(纽约证券交易所代码:RJF)主要由拥有公司 76% 股份的机构股东控制
Simply Wall St ·  05/13 07:10

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Raymond James Financial implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • The top 9 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 各机构持有雷蒙德·詹姆斯金融的大量股权意味着它们对公司的股价具有重大影响
  • 前9名股东拥有公司50%的股份
  • 内部人士最近的销售情况

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Raymond James Financial, Inc. (NYSE:RJF), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 76% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

要了解谁真正控制了雷蒙德·詹姆斯金融公司(纽约证券交易所代码:RJF),了解业务的所有权结构非常重要。而持有最大份额的集团是拥有76%所有权的机构。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

由于机构所有者拥有庞大的资源和流动性,他们的投资决策往往具有很大的分量,尤其是对于个人投资者而言。因此,将大量机构资金投资于公司通常被视为理想的特征。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Raymond James Financial.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于雷蒙德·詹姆斯金融的哪些信息。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:RJF Ownership Breakdown May 13th 2024
纽约证券交易所:RJF 所有权明细 2024 年 5 月 13 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Raymond James Financial?

关于雷蒙德·詹姆斯金融,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购相关基准指数中包含的大型公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Raymond James Financial. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Raymond James Financial's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如你所见,机构投资者持有雷蒙德·詹姆斯金融的相当数量的股份。这表明专业投资者有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会像所有人一样进行不良投资。当多家机构拥有一只股票时,总是存在处于 “拥挤交易” 的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。对于没有增长历史的公司,这种风险更高。你可以在下面看到雷蒙德·詹姆斯金融的历史收益和收入,但请记住,故事总是有更多内容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:RJF Earnings and Revenue Growth May 13th 2024
纽约证券交易所:RJF 收益和收入增长 2024 年 5 月 13 日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Raymond James Financial. Our data shows that The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 11% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 9.3% and 7.9% of the stock.

机构投资者拥有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能会对董事会的决策产生重大影响。我们注意到,对冲基金没有对雷蒙德·詹姆斯金融进行有意义的投资。我们的数据显示,Vanguard Group, Inc.是最大股东,已发行股份为11%。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约9.3%和7.9%的股份。

We also observed that the top 9 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我们还观察到,前9名股东占股票登记册的一半以上,少数规模较小的股东可以在一定程度上平衡大股东的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。有很多分析师在报道该股,因此可能也值得一看他们的预测。

Insider Ownership Of Raymond James Financial

雷蒙德·詹姆斯金融的内部所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

不同国家对内部人员的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是计算在内。公司管理层经营业务,但首席执行官将向董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为这可能表明董事会与其他股东关系良好。但是,在某些情况下,过多的权力集中在该群体中。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Raymond James Financial, Inc.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$2.6b. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

股东们可能会有兴趣得知内部人士拥有雷蒙德·詹姆斯金融公司的股份。内部人士持有价值26亿美元的大量股份。很高兴看到这样的投资水平。你可以在这里查看这些内部人士最近是否在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 13% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Raymond James Financial. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

雷蒙德·詹姆斯金融拥有13%的所有权,公众对雷蒙德·詹姆斯金融有一定程度的影响力,主要是个人投资者。尽管这个群体不一定能做主,但它肯定会对公司的运作方式产生真正的影响。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Raymond James Financial better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Raymond James Financial , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得考虑的。但是,要更好地了解雷蒙德·詹姆斯金融,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。例如,投资风险的幽灵无处不在。我们已经向雷蒙德·詹姆斯金融找到了一个警告信号,我们知道它们应该是你投资过程的一部分。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一样,你可能需要考虑这家公司是会成长还是会萎缩。幸运的是,您可以查看这份免费报告,其中显示了分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发