share_log

We Think Hla Group's (SHSE:600398) Profit Is Only A Baseline For What They Can Achieve

We Think Hla Group's (SHSE:600398) Profit Is Only A Baseline For What They Can Achieve

我们认为Hla集团(SHSE: 600398)的利润只是他们所能实现的目标的基准
Simply Wall St ·  05/06 18:58

Hla Group Corp., Ltd. (SHSE:600398) just reported healthy earnings but the stock price didn't move much. Investors are probably missing some underlying factors which are encouraging for the future of the company.

Hla集团有限公司(SHSE: 600398)刚刚公布了可观的收益,但股价并没有太大波动。投资者可能遗漏了一些对公司未来来说令人鼓舞的潜在因素。

earnings-and-revenue-history
SHSE:600398 Earnings and Revenue History May 6th 2024
SHSE: 600398 收益和收入历史记录 2024 年 5 月 6 日

A Closer Look At Hla Group's Earnings

仔细看看 Hla 集团的收益

In high finance, the key ratio used to measure how well a company converts reported profits into free cash flow (FCF) is the accrual ratio (from cashflow). To get the accrual ratio we first subtract FCF from profit for a period, and then divide that number by the average operating assets for the period. This ratio tells us how much of a company's profit is not backed by free cashflow.

在高级财务中,用于衡量公司将报告的利润转换为自由现金流(FCF)的关键比率是应计比率(来自现金流)。为了获得应计比率,我们首先从一段时期的利润中减去FCF,然后将该数字除以该期间的平均运营资产。这个比率告诉我们,一家公司的利润中有多少没有自由现金流的支持。

That means a negative accrual ratio is a good thing, because it shows that the company is bringing in more free cash flow than its profit would suggest. While having an accrual ratio above zero is of little concern, we do think it's worth noting when a company has a relatively high accrual ratio. To quote a 2014 paper by Lewellen and Resutek, "firms with higher accruals tend to be less profitable in the future".

这意味着负应计比率是一件好事,因为它表明该公司带来的自由现金流比其利润所暗示的要多。虽然应计比率高于零并不令人担忧,但我们确实认为,当公司的应计比率相对较高时,值得注意。引用Lewellen和Resutek在2014年发表的一篇论文,“应计额较高的公司将来的利润往往会降低”。

Over the twelve months to March 2024, Hla Group recorded an accrual ratio of -0.28. That implies it has very good cash conversion, and that its earnings in the last year actually significantly understate its free cash flow. Indeed, in the last twelve months it reported free cash flow of CN¥4.7b, well over the CN¥3.04b it reported in profit. Hla Group's free cash flow improved over the last year, which is generally good to see. Unfortunately for shareholders, the company has also been issuing new shares, diluting their share of future earnings.

在截至2024年3月的十二个月中,Hla集团的应计比率为-0.28。这意味着它的现金转化率非常好,而且其去年的收益实际上大大低估了其自由现金流。事实上,在过去的十二个月中,它报告的自由现金流为47亿元人民币,远远超过其公布的利润30.4亿元人民币。Hla集团的自由现金流比去年有所改善,总体而言,这是值得期待的。对于股东来说,不幸的是,该公司也一直在发行新股,稀释了他们在未来收益中所占的份额。

That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates.

这可能会让你想知道分析师对未来盈利能力的预测。幸运的是,您可以单击此处查看根据他们的估计描绘未来盈利能力的交互式图表。

One essential aspect of assessing earnings quality is to look at how much a company is diluting shareholders. As it happens, Hla Group issued 11% more new shares over the last year. As a result, its net income is now split between a greater number of shares. To talk about net income, without noticing earnings per share, is to be distracted by the big numbers while ignoring the smaller numbers that talk to per share value. Check out Hla Group's historical EPS growth by clicking on this link.

评估收益质量的一个重要方面是研究一家公司在多大程度上稀释了股东。碰巧的是,Hla集团发行的新股比去年增加了11%。结果,其净收入现在分成了更多的股票。在不注意每股收益的情况下谈论净收益,就是被大数字分散注意力,而忽略与之交谈的较小数字 每股 价值。点击此链接,查看Hla集团的历史每股收益增长。

A Look At The Impact Of Hla Group's Dilution On Its Earnings Per Share (EPS)

看看Hla集团的稀释对其每股收益(EPS)的影响

As you can see above, Hla Group has been growing its net income over the last few years, with an annualized gain of 30% over three years. And the 36% profit boost in the last year certainly seems impressive at first glance. On the other hand, earnings per share are only up 33% in that time. So you can see that the dilution has had a bit of an impact on shareholders.

如上所示,Hla集团在过去几年中一直在增长其净收入,三年内年化收益为30%。乍一看,去年36%的利润增长无疑令人印象深刻。另一方面,收入 每股 在那段时间内仅上涨了33%。因此,你可以看到稀释对股东产生了一些影响。

Changes in the share price do tend to reflect changes in earnings per share, in the long run. So it will certainly be a positive for shareholders if Hla Group can grow EPS persistently. But on the other hand, we'd be far less excited to learn profit (but not EPS) was improving. For that reason, you could say that EPS is more important that net income in the long run, assuming the goal is to assess whether a company's share price might grow.

从长远来看,股价的变化往往会反映每股收益的变化。因此,如果Hla集团能够持续增长每股收益,这对股东来说肯定是积极的。但另一方面,得知利润(但不是每股收益)在改善,我们就不那么兴奋了。出于这个原因,你可以说从长远来看,每股收益比净收入更重要,前提是目标是评估公司的股价是否可能上涨。

Our Take On Hla Group's Profit Performance

我们对Hla集团利润表现的看法

In conclusion, Hla Group has strong cashflow relative to earnings, which indicates good quality earnings, but the dilution means its earnings per share growth is weaker than its profit growth. Based on these factors, we think that Hla Group's profits are a reasonably conservative guide to its underlying profitability. In light of this, if you'd like to do more analysis on the company, it's vital to be informed of the risks involved. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Hla Group you should be aware of.

总之,与收益相比,Hla集团的现金流强劲,这表明收益质量良好,但稀释意味着其每股收益增长弱于其利润增长。基于这些因素,我们认为Hla集团的利润是衡量其潜在盈利能力的相当保守的指南。有鉴于此,如果你想对公司进行更多分析,了解所涉及的风险至关重要。一个很好的例子:我们发现了 Hla Group 的 2 个警告信号,你应该注意。

Our examination of Hla Group has focussed on certain factors that can make its earnings look better than they are. But there are plenty of other ways to inform your opinion of a company. For example, many people consider a high return on equity as an indication of favorable business economics, while others like to 'follow the money' and search out stocks that insiders are buying. So you may wish to see this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks that insiders are buying.

我们对Hla集团的审查侧重于某些可能使其收益看起来好于实际的因素。但是,还有很多其他方法可以让你对公司的看法。例如,许多人认为高股本回报率是有利的商业经济的标志,而另一些人则喜欢 “关注资金”,寻找内部人士正在买入的股票。因此,你可能希望看到这份免费收藏的拥有高股本回报率的公司,或者这份内部人士正在购买的股票清单。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发