share_log

After the Recent Decline, Lafang China Co.,Ltd (SHSE:603630) CEO Gui Qian Wu's Holdings Have Lost 16% of Their Value

After the Recent Decline, Lafang China Co.,Ltd (SHSE:603630) CEO Gui Qian Wu's Holdings Have Lost 16% of Their Value

在最近的下跌之后,拉芳中国有限公司, Ltd(上海证券交易所代码:603630)首席执行官吴桂谦的持股已损失了16%的价值
Simply Wall St ·  04/16 21:54

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Lafang ChinaLtd's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
  • 59% of the business is held by the top 2 shareholders
  • Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • Lafang ChinaLTD拥有大量内部所有权,这表明公司扩张具有内在利益
  • 59% 的业务由前两位股东持有
  • 使用公司过去业绩的数据以及所有权研究,可以更好地评估公司的未来表现

A look at the shareholders of Lafang China Co.,Ltd (SHSE:603630) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 59% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

看看拉芳中国股份有限公司的股东, Ltd(上海证券交易所代码:603630)可以告诉我们哪个集团最强大。而持有最大份额的集团是拥有59%所有权的个人内部人士。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果出现低迷,则损失最大)。

As a result, insiders as a group endured the highest losses after market cap fell by CN¥459m.

结果,在市值下降4.59亿元人民币之后,内部人士整体遭受了最大的损失。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Lafang ChinaLtd, beginning with the chart below.

让我们从下图开始,深入研究拉芳中国有限公司的每种类型的所有者。

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:603630 Ownership Breakdown April 17th 2024
SHSE: 603630 所有权明细 2024 年 4 月 17 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Lafang ChinaLtd?

关于拉芳中国有限公司,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购相关基准指数中包含的大型公司。

Less than 5% of Lafang ChinaLtd is held by institutional investors. This suggests that some funds have the company in their sights, but many have not yet bought shares in it. If the company is growing earnings, that may indicate that it is just beginning to catch the attention of these deep-pocketed investors. We sometimes see a rising share price when a few big institutions want to buy a certain stock at the same time. The history of earnings and revenue, which you can see below, could be helpful in considering if more institutional investors will want the stock. Of course, there are plenty of other factors to consider, too.

拉芳中国有限责任公司只有不到5%的股份由机构投资者持有。这表明一些基金将目光投向了该公司,但许多基金尚未购买该公司的股票。如果该公司正在增加收益,那可能表明它才刚刚开始引起这些财力雄厚的投资者的注意。当一些大型机构想同时购买某只股票时,我们有时会看到股价上涨。你可以在下面看到的收益和收入的历史可能有助于考虑是否会有更多的机构投资者想要这只股票。当然,还有很多其他因素需要考虑。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:603630 Earnings and Revenue Growth April 17th 2024
SHSE: 603630 2024 年 4 月 17 日收益和收入增长

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Lafang ChinaLtd. The company's CEO Gui Qian Wu is the largest shareholder with 40% of shares outstanding. Laurena Wu is the second largest shareholder owning 19% of common stock, and Shenzhen Shenghao Kaiyuan Investment Enterprise (Limited Partnership) holds about 1.3% of the company stock.

对冲基金在拉芳中国有限公司的股份不多。该公司首席执行官吴桂谦是最大股东,持有40%的已发行股份。Laurena Wu是第二大股东,拥有19%的普通股,深圳盛豪开元投资企业(有限合伙)持有公司约1.3%的股份。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 2 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.

在进一步挖掘之后,我们发现前两位股东共同控制了公司一半以上的股份,这意味着他们拥有影响公司决策的巨大权力。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议以更深入地了解股票的预期表现也是一种好做法。我们目前没有收到分析师对该股的任何报道,因此该公司不太可能被广泛持有。

Insider Ownership Of Lafang ChinaLtd

拉芳中国有限公司的内部所有权

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间确实有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人士,至少涵盖了董事会成员。管理层最终对董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行委员会成员的情况并不少见,尤其是当他们是创始人或首席执行官时。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部所有权表明领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时,内部所有权是积极的。但是,高度的内部所有权也可以赋予公司内部的一小部分人巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of Lafang China Co.,Ltd. This gives them effective control of the company. Given it has a market cap of CN¥2.6b, that means they have CN¥1.5b worth of shares. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish todiscover (for free) if they have been buying or selling.

我们的信息表明,内部人士拥有拉芳中国有限公司一半以上的股份。, Ltd. 这使他们能够有效控制公司。鉴于其市值为26亿元人民币,这意味着他们拥有价值15亿元人民币的股票。大多数人会很高兴看到董事会与他们一起投资。您可能希望(免费)了解他们是否在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 38% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

包括散户投资者在内的公众拥有该公司38%的股份,因此不容忽视。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以影响对他们有利的政策决定,但它们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Lafang ChinaLtd better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Lafang ChinaLtd (1 is concerning!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得考虑的。但是,要更好地了解Lafang ChinaLTD,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。例如,我们发现了 Lafang ChinaLTD 的 2 个警告信号(1 个令人担忧!)在这里投资之前,您应该注意这一点。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.

当然,这可能不是最值得买入的股票。因此,您可能希望看到我们免费收集的具有良好财务状况的有趣潜在客户。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发