share_log

Institutional Investors May Overlook Liquidia Corporation's (NASDAQ:LQDA) Recent US$134m Market Cap Drop as Long-term Gains Remain Positive

Institutional Investors May Overlook Liquidia Corporation's (NASDAQ:LQDA) Recent US$134m Market Cap Drop as Long-term Gains Remain Positive

由于长期收益仍然乐观,机构投资者可能会忽略Liquidia Corporation(纳斯达克股票代码:LQDA)最近1.34亿美元的市值下跌
Simply Wall St ·  04/14 09:11

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Liquidia implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 9 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 机构在Liquidia的大量持股意味着它们对公司的股价具有重大影响
  • 共有9名投资者拥有该公司的多数股权,拥有52%的所有权
  • 业内人士最近一直在抛售

If you want to know who really controls Liquidia Corporation (NASDAQ:LQDA), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 38% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果你想知道谁真正控制着Liquidia Corporation(纳斯达克股票代码:LQDA),那么你必须看看其股票登记处的构成。机构拥有38%的股份,是公司的最大股份。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

Institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's market cap fell by US$134m last week. However, the 106% one-year return to shareholders might have softened the blow. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.

上周该公司的市值下降了1.34亿美元后,机构投资者遭受了最大的损失。但是,106%的股东一年回报率可能减轻了打击。但是,我们假设他们将来会注意弱点。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Liquidia, beginning with the chart below.

让我们从下图开始,深入研究Liquidia的每种所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqCM:LQDA Ownership Breakdown April 14th 2024
纳斯达克股票代码:LQDA 所有权明细 2024 年 4 月 14 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Liquidia?

关于Liquidia,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构根据近似于当地市场的指数来衡量自己的表现。因此,他们通常会更多地关注主要指数中包含的公司。

Liquidia already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Liquidia, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

Liquidia已经在股票登记处设立了机构。事实上,他们拥有该公司可观的股份。这可能表明该公司在投资界具有一定程度的信誉。但是,最好谨慎行事,不要依赖机构投资者所谓的验证。他们也是,有时候会弄错。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得检查一下Liquidia过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqCM:LQDA Earnings and Revenue Growth April 14th 2024
纳斯达克股票代码:LQDA 收益和收入增长 2024 年 4 月 14 日

It looks like hedge funds own 14% of Liquidia shares. That catches my attention because hedge funds sometimes try to influence management, or bring about changes that will create near term value for shareholders. The company's largest shareholder is Caligan Partners, LP, with ownership of 14%. Legend Aggregator Advisors, LLC is the second largest shareholder owning 9.4% of common stock, and Paul Manning holds about 7.6% of the company stock. Paul Manning, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Member of the Board of Directors. Additionally, the company's CEO Roger Jeffs directly holds 2.6% of the total shares outstanding.

看来对冲基金拥有Liquidia14%的股份。这引起了我的注意,因为对冲基金有时会试图影响管理层,或者带来能够为股东创造短期价值的变革。该公司的最大股东是Caligan Partners, LP,其所有权为14%。Legend Aggregator Advisors, LLC是第二大股东,拥有9.4%的普通股,保罗·曼宁持有该公司约7.6%的股份。第三大股东保罗·曼宁也恰好拥有董事会成员的头衔。此外,该公司首席执行官罗杰夫斯直接持有已发行股份总额的2.6%。

We also observed that the top 9 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我们还观察到,前9名股东占股票登记册的一半以上,少数规模较小的股东可以在一定程度上平衡大股东的利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向哪个方向吹来也是有意义的。有相当数量的分析师在报道该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Liquidia

Liquidia 的内部所有权

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间确实有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人士,至少涵盖了董事会成员。管理层最终对董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行委员会成员的情况并不少见,尤其是当他们是创始人或首席执行官时。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使其他股东更难追究董事会对决策的责任。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Liquidia Corporation. It has a market capitalization of just US$1.1b, and insiders have US$119m worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我们最新的数据表明,内部人士拥有Liquidia公司合理比例的股份。它的市值仅为11亿美元,内部人士以自己的名义持有价值1.19亿美元的股票。这非常重要。很高兴看到这样的投资水平。你可以在这里查看这些内部人士最近是否在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 28% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Liquidia. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

拥有28%的所有权的公众(主要由个人投资者组成)对Liquidia有一定程度的影响力。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以影响对他们有利的政策决定,但它们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有权

We can see that Private Companies own 9.5%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我们可以看到,私人公司拥有已发行股份的9.5%。可能值得对此进行更深入的研究。如果关联方,例如内部人士,对其中一家私营公司有兴趣,则应在年度报告中予以披露。私营公司也可能在公司中拥有战略利益。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Liquidia better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Liquidia that you should be aware of before investing here.

拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得考虑的。但是,为了更好地了解Liquidia,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。例如,我们发现了Liquidia的两个警告信号,在这里投资之前,您应该注意这些信号。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一样,你可能需要考虑这家公司是会成长还是会萎缩。幸运的是,您可以查看这份免费报告,其中显示了分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发