share_log

R&G PharmaStudies Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:301333) Market Cap Dropped CN¥422m Last Week; Individual Investors Who Hold 51% Were Hit as Were Institutions

R&G PharmaStudies Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:301333) Market Cap Dropped CN¥422m Last Week; Individual Investors Who Hold 51% Were Hit as Were Institutions

R&G 制药研究有限公司's (SZSE: 301333) 上周市值下降了4.22亿元人民币;持有51%的个人投资者和机构一样受到打击
Simply Wall St ·  03/07 18:31

Key Insights

关键见解

  • R&G PharmaStudies' significant private companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • The top 3 shareholders own 53% of the company
  • 14% of R&G PharmaStudies is held by insiders
  • R&G PharmaStudies拥有大量私营公司所有权,这表明关键决策受广大公众股东的影响
  • 前三名股东拥有公司53%的股份
  • R&G PharmaStudies的14%由内部人士持有

Every investor in R&G PharmaStudies Co., Ltd. (SZSE:301333) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 51% stake, private companies possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

R&G PharmaStudies有限公司(深圳证券交易所代码:301333)的每位投资者都应该了解最强大的股东群体。私营公司拥有51%的股份,拥有该公司的最大股份。换句话说,该集团将从对公司的投资中获得最多(或损失最大)。

While the holdings of private companies took a hit after last week's 8.8% price drop, institutions with their 16% holdings also suffered.

尽管在上周股价下跌8.8%之后,私营公司的持股量受到打击,但持有16%的机构也遭受了损失。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of R&G PharmaStudies, beginning with the chart below.

让我们从下图开始,深入研究R&G PharmaStudies的每种所有者。

ownership-breakdown
SZSE:301333 Ownership Breakdown March 7th 2024
SZSE: 301333 所有权明细 2024 年 3 月 7 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About R&G PharmaStudies?

关于R&G PharmaStudies,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构在向自己的投资者报告时通常会根据基准来衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会对股票更加热情。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在册,尤其是在它们正在成长的情况下。

We can see that R&G PharmaStudies does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at R&G PharmaStudies' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我们可以看到,R&G PharmaStudies确实有机构投资者;他们持有该公司很大一部分股票。这意味着在这些机构工作的分析师已经看过这只股票,他们很喜欢。但是就像其他人一样,他们可能错了。如果多家机构同时改变对股票的看法,你可能会看到股价快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看R&G PharmaStudies的收益记录。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SZSE:301333 Earnings and Revenue Growth March 7th 2024
SZSE: 301333 2024 年 3 月 7 日收益和收入增长

R&G PharmaStudies is not owned by hedge funds. Ace Union Holding Limited is currently the company's largest shareholder with 29% of shares outstanding. With 12% and 12% of the shares outstanding respectively, Hongbei Zheng and Shihezi Kangyunfu Equity Investment Co., Ltd. are the second and third largest shareholders.

R&G PharmaStudies不归对冲基金所有。Ace Union Holding Limited目前是该公司的最大股东,已发行股份为29%。郑宏北和石河子康云富股权投资有限公司分别持有12%和12%的已发行股份,是第二和第三大股东。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 3 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.

在进一步挖掘之后,我们发现前三名股东共同控制了公司一半以上的股份,这意味着他们拥有影响公司决策的巨大权力。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向哪个方向吹来也是有意义的。有一些分析师对这只股票的报道,但随着时间的推移,它仍可能变得更加广为人知。

Insider Ownership Of R&G PharmaStudies

R&G PharmaStudies 的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理层对董事会负责,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也是董事会成员。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使其他股东更难追究董事会对决策的责任。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of R&G PharmaStudies Co., Ltd.. Insiders have a CN¥595m stake in this CN¥4.4b business. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.

内部人士似乎拥有R&G PharmaStudies有限公司的很大一部分股份。内部人士在这项44亿元的业务中持有5.95亿元人民币的股份。很高兴看到内部人士对这项业务进行如此投资。可能值得检查一下这些内部人士最近是否在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 10% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散户投资者在内的公众拥有该公司10%的股份,因此不容忽视。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股权所有权

Private equity firms hold a 7.2% stake in R&G PharmaStudies. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

私募股权公司持有R&G PharmaStudies7.2%的股份。这表明他们可以在关键政策决策中发挥影响力。有些人可能会喜欢这样,因为私募股权有时是追究管理层责任的激进分子。但是其他时候,私募股权在公司上市后正在售罄。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有权

We can see that Private Companies own 51%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我们可以看到,私人公司拥有已发行股份的51%。仅凭这一事实很难得出任何结论,因此值得研究谁拥有这些私营公司。有时,内部人士或其他关联方通过一家独立的私人公司对上市公司的股份拥有权益。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand R&G PharmaStudies better, we need to consider many other factors.

拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得考虑的。但是,为了更好地了解R&G PharmaStudies,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我喜欢更深入地了解一家公司过去的表现。您可以在这张详细图表中找到历史收入和收入。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你想了解分析师对未来增长的预测,千万不要错过这份关于分析师预测的免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发