share_log

With 42% Ownership, Robinhood Markets, Inc. (NASDAQ:HOOD) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

With 42% Ownership, Robinhood Markets, Inc. (NASDAQ:HOOD) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

Robinhood Markets, Inc.(纳斯达克股票代码:HOOD)拥有 42% 的所有权,拥有强大的机构支持
Simply Wall St ·  01/09 06:39

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Robinhood Markets' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 52% of the business is held by the top 8 shareholders
  • 15% of Robinhood Markets is held by insiders
  • 高机构所有权意味着Robinhood Markets的股价对其交易行为很敏感
  • 52% 的业务由前8名股东持有
  • Robinhood Markets 15% 的股份由内部人士持有

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Robinhood Markets, Inc. (NASDAQ:HOOD), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 42% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解谁真正控制了Robinhood Markets, Inc.(纳斯达克股票代码:HOOD),了解该业务的所有权结构很重要。我们可以看到,机构拥有该公司的大部分股份,所有权为42%。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果出现低迷,则损失最大)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

鉴于其可支配的资金和研究能力巨大,机构所有权往往具有很大的份量,对于个人投资者而言尤其如此。因此,向公司投资的大量机构资金通常被视为积极属性。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Robinhood Markets, beginning with the chart below.

让我们从下图开始,深入研究Robinhood Markets的每种类型的所有者。

See our latest analysis for Robinhood Markets

查看我们对 Robinhood Markets 的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:HOOD Ownership Breakdown January 9th 2024
NASDAQGS:HOOD 所有权明细 2024 年 1 月 9 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Robinhood Markets?

关于罗宾汉市场,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构在向自己的投资者报告时通常会根据基准来衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会变得更加热情。我们预计大多数公司都会注册一些机构,尤其是在它们成长的情况下。

We can see that Robinhood Markets does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Robinhood Markets, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我们可以看到,Robinhood Markets确实有机构投资者;他们持有该公司很大一部分股票。这表明专业投资者有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会像所有人一样进行不良投资。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得检查一下Robinhood Markets过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:HOOD Earnings and Revenue Growth January 9th 2024
NASDAQGS: HOOD 收益和收入增长 2024 年 1 月 9 日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Robinhood Markets. Because actions speak louder than words, we consider it a good sign when insiders own a significant stake in a company. In Robinhood Markets' case, its Top Key Executive, Baiju Bhatt, is the largest shareholder, holding 7.7% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.7% and 7.1%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Interestingly, the third-largest shareholder, Vladimir Tenev is also a Chairman of the Board, again, indicating strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.

对冲基金在罗宾汉市场的股票不多。因为行动胜于雄辩,所以我们认为当内部人士拥有公司的大量股份时,这是一个好兆头。就罗宾汉市场而言,其最高主要高管百居·巴特是最大股东,持有7.7%的已发行股份。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有已发行股份的7.7%和7.1%。有趣的是,第三大股东弗拉基米尔·特内夫也是董事会主席,这再次表明该公司最大股东拥有强大的内部所有权。

We also observed that the top 8 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我们还观察到,前8名股东占股份登记册的一半以上,少数较小的股东在一定程度上平衡较大股东的利益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权可以为你的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议以更深入地了解股票的预期表现也是一种很好的做法。有合理数量的分析师报道该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体看法可能会很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Robinhood Markets

罗宾汉市场的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。管理层最终对董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行委员会成员的情况并不少见,尤其是当他们是创始人或首席执行官时。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部所有权表明领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时,内部所有权是积极的。但是,高度的内部所有权也可以赋予公司内部的一小部分人巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Robinhood Markets, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$10b, and insiders have US$1.6b worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我们的最新数据表明,内部人士拥有Robinhood Markets, Inc.合理比例的股份。它的市值仅为100亿美元,内部人士以自己的名义持有价值16亿美元的股票。这非常重要。很高兴看到这样的投资水平。你可以在这里查看这些内部人士最近是否在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 16% stake in Robinhood Markets. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公众通常是个人投资者,持有罗宾汉市场16%的股份。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以影响对他们有利的政策决定,但它们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股权所有权

With a stake of 20%, private equity firms could influence the Robinhood Markets board. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

私募股权公司持有20%的股份,可能会影响罗宾汉市场董事会。一些投资者可能会为此感到鼓舞,因为私募股权有时能够鼓励制定有助于市场看到公司价值的策略。或者,这些持有人可能会在投资上市后退出投资。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有权

We can see that Private Companies own 6.5%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我们可以看到,私人公司拥有已发行股份的6.5%。仅凭这一事实很难得出任何结论,因此值得研究谁拥有这些私营公司。有时,内部人士或其他关联方通过一家独立的私人公司对上市公司的股份拥有权益。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.

我觉得看看究竟是谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们也需要考虑其他信息。

Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.

许多人发现深入了解一家公司过去的表现很有用。您可以访问过去的收入、收入和现金流的详细图表。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一样,你可能需要考虑这家公司是增长还是萎缩。幸运的是,您可以查看这份免费报告,该报告显示了分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St 的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并非旨在提供财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。华尔街只是没有持有上述任何股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发