share_log

Private Companies Invested in Hla Group Corp., Ltd. (SHSE:600398) Copped the Brunt of Last Week's CN¥1.5b Market Cap Decline

Private Companies Invested in Hla Group Corp., Ltd. (SHSE:600398) Copped the Brunt of Last Week's CN¥1.5b Market Cap Decline

投资海澜集团有限公司(上海证券交易所代码:600398)的私营公司首当其冲地应对了上周15亿元人民币的市值下跌
Simply Wall St ·  2023/10/24 03:17

Key Insights

主要见解

  • The considerable ownership by private companies in Hla Group indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 67% ownership
  • Insider ownership in Hla Group is 26%
  • 私人公司在HLA集团的大量所有权表明,它们在管理和商业战略方面共同拥有更大的话语权
  • 共有2名投资者持有该公司67%的多数股权
  • HLA集团的内部人持股比例为26%

A look at the shareholders of Hla Group Corp., Ltd. (SHSE:600398) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that private companies own the lion's share in the company with 48% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看看HLA集团有限公司(上交所代码:600398)的股东,就能知道哪个集团最有权势。我们可以看到,私营公司以48%的所有权拥有该公司的最大份额。换句话说,该集团面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

Following a 4.4% decrease in the stock price last week, private companies suffered the most losses, but insiders who own 26% stock also took a hit.

继上周股价下跌4.4%后,私营企业损失最大,但持有26%股票的内部人士也受到了打击。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Hla Group.

在下面的图表中,我们放大了HLA集团的不同所有权组。

View our latest analysis for Hla Group

查看我们对HLA集团的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:600398 Ownership Breakdown October 24th 2023
上海证交所:600398所有权明细2023年10月24日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Hla Group?

关于HLA集团,机构持股告诉了我们什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与经常跟踪的指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常确实会考虑收购被纳入相关基准指数的较大公司。

Hla Group already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Hla Group, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

HL A集团已经在股票登记处登记了机构。事实上,他们在该公司拥有可观的股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经研究了这只股票,他们喜欢它。但就像其他人一样,他们也可能错了。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售一只股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得查看一下HLA集团过去的收益轨迹(见下图)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:600398 Earnings and Revenue Growth October 24th 2023
上海证交所:600398收益和收入增长2023年10月24日

Hla Group is not owned by hedge funds. Heilan Group Co., Ltd. is currently the largest shareholder, with 41% of shares outstanding. With 26% and 3.8% of the shares outstanding respectively, Jian Ping Zhou and Hailan International Trade Co., Ltd. are the second and third largest shareholders.

HL A集团并非由对冲基金所有。海澜集团股份有限公司目前为第一大股东,持有41%的流通股。建平周和海澜国际贸易有限公司分别持有26%和3.8%的流通股,是第二大股东和第三大股东。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

为了让我们的研究更有趣,我们发现,前两名股东拥有公司的多数股权,这意味着他们足够强大,可以影响公司的决策。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究机构持股是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪,也可以达到同样的效果。有很多分析师在追踪这只股票,所以他们的预测可能也是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of Hla Group

HLA集团的内部人所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

尽管对内部人的准确定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人。公司管理层对董事会负责,董事会应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时最高层管理人员本身也是董事会成员。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部人持股是积极的,因为它可以表明董事会与其他股东很好地结盟。然而,在某些情况下,太多的权力集中在这个群体中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Hla Group Corp., Ltd.. Insiders own CN¥8.3b worth of shares in the CN¥32b company. That's quite meaningful. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我们的最新数据显示,内部人士持有HLA集团有限公司相当比例的股份。内部人士在这家价值320亿元的公司持有价值83亿元的股份。这是很有意义的。很高兴看到这样的投资水平。你可以在这里查看这些内部人士最近是否一直在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 15% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

包括散户投资者在内的普通公众持有该公司15%的股份,因此不能轻易忽视。尽管这种规模的所有权可能不足以影响有利于他们的政策决定,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Private Company Ownership

私营公司所有权

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 48%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我们的数据显示,私营公司持有该公司48%的股份。或许有必要对此进行更深入的研究。如果关联方,如内部人士,对这些私营公司中的一家有利害关系,则应在年报中披露。私营公司也可能对该公司拥有战略利益。

Next Steps:

接下来的步骤:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Hla Group better, we need to consider many other factors. Be aware that Hla Group is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...

拥有一家公司股票的不同集团总是值得考虑的。但要更好地了解人类白细胞抗原集团,我们还需要考虑许多其他因素。请注意,HLA集团正在展示在我们的投资分析中出现1个警告信号,你应该知道关于……

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终这就是未来,而不是过去,这将决定这家企业的所有者将做得多好。因此,我们认为,看看这份免费报告是明智的,它显示了分析师是否预测到了更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数字是使用过去12个月的数据计算的,指的是截至财务报表日期的最后一个月的12个月期间。这可能与全年的年度报告数字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有什么反馈吗?担心内容吗? 保持联系直接与我们联系。或者,也可以给编辑组发电子邮件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰写,具有概括性。我们仅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并不打算作为财务建议。它不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也没有考虑你的目标或你的财务状况。我们的目标是为您带来由基本面数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会将最新的对价格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考虑在内。Simply Wall St.对上述任何一只股票都没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发