share_log

Lemonade, Inc.'s (NYSE:LMND) Institutional Investors Lost 5.1% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains

Lemonade, Inc.'s (NYSE:LMND) Institutional Investors Lost 5.1% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains

Lemonade, Inc. 's(纽约证券交易所代码:LMND)机构投资者上周下跌5.1%,但受益于长期涨势
Simply Wall St ·  04/17 11:55

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Lemonade implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 9 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Insiders have been buying lately
  • 机构持有Lemonade的大量股权意味着它们对公司的股价具有重大影响
  • 共有9名投资者拥有该公司的多数股权,拥有51%的所有权
  • 内部人士最近一直在买入

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Lemonade, Inc. (NYSE:LMND), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 45% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解谁真正控制了Lemonade, Inc.(纽约证券交易所代码:LMND),了解业务的所有权结构很重要。而持有最大份额的集团是拥有45%所有权的机构。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果股价下跌,则损失最大)。

Institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$1.1b last week. However, the 23% one-year returns may have helped alleviate their overall losses. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.

上周该公司的市值跌至11亿美元后,机构投资者是受影响最大的群体。但是,23%的一年期回报率可能有助于减轻他们的总体损失。但是,我们假设他们将来会注意弱点。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Lemonade, beginning with the chart below.

让我们从下图开始,深入研究Lemonade的每种类型的所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:LMND Ownership Breakdown April 17th 2024
纽约证券交易所:LMND 所有权明细 2024 年 4 月 17 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Lemonade?

关于柠檬水,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购相关基准指数中包含的大型公司。

We can see that Lemonade does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Lemonade's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我们可以看到,Lemonade确实有机构投资者;他们持有该公司很大一部分股票。这意味着在这些机构工作的分析师已经看过这只股票,他们很喜欢。但是就像其他人一样,他们可能错了。如果多家机构同时改变对股票的看法,你可能会看到股价快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看Lemonade的收益记录。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:LMND Earnings and Revenue Growth April 17th 2024
纽约证券交易所:LMND 收益和收入增长 2024 年 4 月 17 日

Lemonade is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that Softbank Group Capital Limited is the largest shareholder with 17% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 7.4% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.5% by the third-largest shareholder.

柠檬水不归对冲基金所有。我们的数据显示,软银集团资本有限公司是最大股东,已发行股份的17%。就背景而言,第二大股东持有约7.4%的已发行股份,其次是第三大股东持有6.5%的所有权。

We also observed that the top 9 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我们还观察到,前9名股东占股票登记册的一半以上,少数规模较小的股东可以在一定程度上平衡大股东的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。有很多分析师在报道该股,因此可能也值得一看他们的预测。

Insider Ownership Of Lemonade

柠檬水的内部所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同国家对内部人士的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是计算在内。公司管理层对董事会的回答,董事会应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也在董事会中。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为这可能表明董事会与其他股东关系良好。但是,在某些情况下,过多的权力集中在该群体中。

We can see that insiders own shares in Lemonade, Inc.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$65m. Most would see this as a real positive. If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我们可以看到内部人士拥有Lemonade, Inc.的股份。内部人士持有价值6500万美元的大量股份。大多数人会认为这是一个真正的积极因素。如果您想探讨内幕调整问题,可以点击此处查看内部人士是否在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 30% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Lemonade. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

拥有30%所有权的公众(主要由个人投资者组成)对Lemonade有一定程度的影响力。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股权所有权

With an ownership of 17%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

私募股权公司拥有17%的所有权,可以在制定以价值创造为重点的公司战略方面发挥作用。一些投资者可能会为此感到鼓舞,因为私募股权有时能够鼓励制定有助于市场看到公司价值的策略。或者,这些持有人可能会在投资上市后退出投资。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Lemonade better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Lemonade that you should be aware of.

拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得考虑的。但是,为了更好地理解柠檬水,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。例如,我们已经确定了两个你应该注意的柠檬水警告信号。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

归根结底,未来是最重要的。您可以访问这份关于公司分析师预测的免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发