share_log

In the Wake of Radware Ltd.'s (NASDAQ:RDWR) Latest US$55m Market Cap Drop, Institutional Owners May Be Forced to Take Severe Actions

In the Wake of Radware Ltd.'s (NASDAQ:RDWR) Latest US$55m Market Cap Drop, Institutional Owners May Be Forced to Take Severe Actions

在 Radware Ltd. 之后”s(纳斯达克股票代码:RDWR)最新市值下降了5500万美元,机构所有者可能被迫采取严厉行动
Simply Wall St ·  04/16 07:53

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Radware's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 7 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 高机构所有权意味着Radware的股价对其交易行为很敏感
  • 共有7名投资者持有该公司的多数股权,所有权为50%
  • 所有权研究以及分析师预测数据有助于更好地了解股票的机会

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Radware Ltd. (NASDAQ:RDWR), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 68% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

要了解谁真正控制了Radware Ltd.(纳斯达克股票代码:RDWR),了解该业务的所有权结构非常重要。而持有最大份额的集团是拥有68%所有权的机构。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

And so it follows that institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$695m last week after a 7.4% drop in the share price. The recent loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 23% for stockholders, may not sit well with this group of investors. Institutions or "liquidity providers" control large sums of money and therefore, these types of investors usually have a lot of influence over stock price movements. Hence, if weakness in Radware's share price continues, institutional investors may feel compelled to sell the stock, which might not be ideal for individual investors.

因此,上周该公司的市值在股价下跌7.4%后跌至6.95亿美元,因此机构投资者是受影响最大的群体。最近的亏损加上股东一年的亏损23%,可能不适合这群投资者。机构或 “流动性提供者” 控制着大量资金,因此,这些类型的投资者通常对股价走势有很大的影响力。因此,如果Radware股价持续疲软,机构投资者可能会感到不得不出售该股票,这对于个人投资者来说可能并不理想。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Radware.

在下图中,我们放大了Radware的不同所有权组。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:RDWR Ownership Breakdown April 16th 2024
纳斯达克GS:RDWR 所有权明细 2024 年 4 月 16 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Radware?

关于Radware,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构在向自己的投资者报告时通常会根据基准来衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会对股票更加热情。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在册,尤其是在它们正在成长的情况下。

We can see that Radware does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Radware, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我们可以看到,Radware确实有机构投资者;他们持有该公司很大一部分股票。这表明专业投资者有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这一事实,因为机构有时会像所有人一样进行不良投资。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得检查一下Radware过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:RDWR Earnings and Revenue Growth April 16th 2024
纳斯达克GS:RDWR 收益和收入增长 2024 年 4 月 16 日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Our data indicates that hedge funds own 9.8% of Radware. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. First Trust Advisors LP is currently the largest shareholder, with 10% of shares outstanding. With 9.8% and 8.5% of the shares outstanding respectively, Senvest Management, LLC and Morgan Stanley, Investment Banking and Brokerage Investments are the second and third largest shareholders. Additionally, the company's CEO Roy Zisapel directly holds 3.7% of the total shares outstanding.

投资者应注意,机构实际上拥有公司一半以上的股份,因此它们可以共同行使巨大的权力。我们的数据表明,对冲基金拥有Radware9.8%的股份。这很有趣,因为对冲基金可以非常活跃和活跃。许多人正在寻找推动股价上涨的中期催化剂。First Trust Advisors LP目前是最大股东,已发行股份的10%。Senvest Management, LLC和摩根士丹利、投资银行和经纪投资分别占已发行股份的9.8%和8.5%,是第二和第三大股东。此外,该公司首席执行官罗伊·齐萨佩尔直接持有已发行股份总额的3.7%。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 7 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

经过进一步检查,我们发现公司一半以上的股份由前7名股东持有,这表明较大股东的利益在一定程度上被较小的股东所平衡。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向哪个方向吹来也是有意义的。有相当数量的分析师在报道该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Radware

Radware 的内部所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

不同国家对内部人士的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是计算在内。管理层最终向董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行董事会成员的情况并不少见,特别是如果他们是创始人或首席执行官。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使其他股东更难追究董事会对决策的责任。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Radware Ltd.. In their own names, insiders own US$25m worth of stock in the US$695m company. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我们可以报告说,内部人士确实拥有Radware Ltd的股份。内部人士以自己的名义拥有这家价值6.95亿美元的公司价值2500万美元的股票。有人会说,这表明股东和董事会之间的利益一致。但是可能值得检查一下这些内部人士是否一直在出售。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 11% stake in Radware. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公众通常是个人投资者,持有Radware11%的股份。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以影响对他们有利的政策决定,但它们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有权

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 7.3%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我们的数据显示,私营公司持有公司7.3%的股份。私营公司可能是关联方。有时,内部人士通过控股私营公司而对上市公司拥有权益,而不是以个人身份拥有权益。尽管很难得出任何宽泛的结论,但值得注意的是,这是一个需要进一步研究的领域。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Radware better, we need to consider many other factors.

拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得考虑的。但是,为了更好地了解Radware,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。

I always like to check for a history of revenue growth. You can too, by accessing this free chart of historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我一直喜欢查看收入增长的历史。您也可以,通过访问此详细图表中的这张免费的历史收入和收益图表。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但归根结底,决定这家企业所有者的表现的是未来,而不是过去。因此,我们认为最好看一下这份免费报告,该报告显示了分析师是否预测了更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发