share_log

The Past Five Years for MTR (HKG:66) Investors Has Not Been Profitable

The Past Five Years for MTR (HKG:66) Investors Has Not Been Profitable

港铁(HKG: 66)投资者过去五年没有盈利
Simply Wall St ·  03/31 21:31

In order to justify the effort of selecting individual stocks, it's worth striving to beat the returns from a market index fund. But even the best stock picker will only win with some selections. So we wouldn't blame long term MTR Corporation Limited (HKG:66) shareholders for doubting their decision to hold, with the stock down 47% over a half decade. And some of the more recent buyers are probably worried, too, with the stock falling 32% in the last year. The falls have accelerated recently, with the share price down 15% in the last three months. We note that the company has reported results fairly recently; and the market is hardly delighted. You can check out the latest numbers in our company report.

为了证明选择个股的努力是合理的,值得努力超越市场指数基金的回报。但是,即使是最好的选股者也只能通过以下方式获胜 一些 选择。因此,我们不会责怪香港铁路有限公司(HKG:66)的长期股东怀疑他们的持股决定,该股在五年内下跌了47%。一些最近的买家可能也感到担忧,该股去年下跌了32%。最近跌势加速,股价在过去三个月中下跌了15%。我们注意到,该公司最近公布了业绩;市场对此并不满意。你可以在我们的公司报告中查看最新的数字。

With that in mind, it's worth seeing if the company's underlying fundamentals have been the driver of long term performance, or if there are some discrepancies.

考虑到这一点,值得一看公司的基本面是否是长期业绩的驱动力,或者是否存在一些差异。

While the efficient markets hypothesis continues to be taught by some, it has been proven that markets are over-reactive dynamic systems, and investors are not always rational. One imperfect but simple way to consider how the market perception of a company has shifted is to compare the change in the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price movement.

尽管一些人继续教导高效市场假说,但事实证明,市场是反应过度的动态系统,投资者并不总是理性的。考虑市场对公司的看法发生了怎样的变化的一种不完美但简单的方法是将每股收益(EPS)的变化与股价走势进行比较。

During five years of share price growth, MTR moved from a loss to profitability. Most would consider that to be a good thing, so it's counter-intuitive to see the share price declining. Other metrics might give us a better handle on how its value is changing over time.

在股价增长的五年中,MTR从亏损转为盈利。大多数人会认为这是一件好事,因此股价下跌是违反直觉的。其他指标可能会让我们更好地了解其价值如何随着时间的推移而变化。

We note that the dividend has remained healthy, so that wouldn't really explain the share price drop. While it's not completely obvious why the share price is down, a closer look at the company's history might help explain it.

我们注意到股息一直保持健康,因此这并不能真正解释股价下跌的原因。尽管股价下跌的原因尚不完全明显,但仔细研究该公司的历史可能有助于解释这一点。

The image below shows how earnings and revenue have tracked over time (if you click on the image you can see greater detail).

下图显示了收入和收入随时间推移的跟踪情况(如果您点击图片,可以看到更多细节)。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SEHK:66 Earnings and Revenue Growth April 1st 2024
SEHK: 66 2024年4月1日的收益和收入增长

MTR is well known by investors, and plenty of clever analysts have tried to predict the future profit levels. So it makes a lot of sense to check out what analysts think MTR will earn in the future (free analyst consensus estimates)

MTR为投资者所熟知,许多聪明的分析师都试图预测未来的利润水平。因此,看看分析师认为MTR将来的收入很有意义(免费的分析师共识估计)

What About Dividends?

分红呢?

When looking at investment returns, it is important to consider the difference between total shareholder return (TSR) and share price return. The TSR is a return calculation that accounts for the value of cash dividends (assuming that any dividend received was reinvested) and the calculated value of any discounted capital raisings and spin-offs. Arguably, the TSR gives a more comprehensive picture of the return generated by a stock. In the case of MTR, it has a TSR of -38% for the last 5 years. That exceeds its share price return that we previously mentioned. The dividends paid by the company have thusly boosted the total shareholder return.

在考虑投资回报时,重要的是要考虑两者之间的区别 股东总回报 (TSR) 和 股价回报。股东总回报率是一种回报计算方法,它考虑了现金分红的价值(假设收到的任何股息都经过再投资)以及任何贴现资本筹集和分拆的计算价值。可以说,股东总回报率更全面地描述了股票产生的回报。就地铁而言,在过去5年的股东回报率为-38%。这超过了我们之前提到的其股价回报率。因此,该公司支付的股息提高了 股东回报。

A Different Perspective

不同的视角

While the broader market lost about 9.6% in the twelve months, MTR shareholders did even worse, losing 29% (even including dividends). However, it could simply be that the share price has been impacted by broader market jitters. It might be worth keeping an eye on the fundamentals, in case there's a good opportunity. Regrettably, last year's performance caps off a bad run, with the shareholders facing a total loss of 7% per year over five years. Generally speaking long term share price weakness can be a bad sign, though contrarian investors might want to research the stock in hope of a turnaround. It's always interesting to track share price performance over the longer term. But to understand MTR better, we need to consider many other factors. Even so, be aware that MTR is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about...

尽管整个市场在十二个月中下跌了约9.6%,但港铁股东的表现甚至更糟,下跌了29%(甚至包括股息)。但是,可能只是股价受到了更广泛的市场紧张情绪的影响。如果有很好的机会,可能值得关注基本面。遗憾的是,去年的业绩结束了糟糕的表现,股东在五年内每年面临7%的总亏损。总的来说,长期股价疲软可能是一个坏兆头,尽管逆势投资者可能希望研究该股以期出现转机。长期跟踪股价表现总是很有意思的。但是,为了更好地理解地铁,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。即便如此,请注意,MTR在我们的投资分析中显示了两个警告信号,您应该知道...

For those who like to find winning investments this free list of growing companies with recent insider purchasing, could be just the ticket.

对于那些喜欢寻找中奖投资的人来说,这份最近有内幕收购的成长型公司的免费名单可能只是门票。

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on Hong Kong exchanges.

请注意,本文引用的市场回报反映了目前在香港交易所交易的股票的市场加权平均回报。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发